Charter AS20115 Contact

Could a Charter network engineer reach out off list for an issue we are seeing when trying to reach any Charter customers under the AS20115 We don't peer with (or get transit) directly from AS20115 and traffic seems to be blocked at the border with our transit providers and AS20115 We have tried

Re: Cleveland/Cincinnati Co-location

CyrusOne and Immedion are the only 2 datacenters in Cincinnati that have a decent spread of what little connectivity Cincinnati has going through it. Immedion is down on 3rd street Reach out off list if you have questions or want an intro. On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:20 PM Matt Erculiani wrote:

Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service)

What Cogent charges is not a one time fee, its monthly recurring On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:43 AM H I Baysal wrote: > Indeed, its a one time fee to setup BGP. And as a side note, > I's also separate for v4 and v6 sessions. > > I was also taken aback when i heard it the first time. > On 17-10-18

Re: Cogent charging 50/mo for BGP (not IPs, the service)

Yes - we just renewed/ upgraded and they hit us with it - pushed back at the lower the bandwidth cost a little bit to compensate for it On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:55 AM David Hubbard < dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote: > Yep we pay it on our circuits, begrudgingly. Wouldn’t mind it as much

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

When I lasted checked in with Ubiquiti on these issues for that and the ER-Pros - they told me that everything was to be resolved in 2.0 We shall see... On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > Ah, okay. I haven't used one yet. > > Also, I don't talk about

Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent

om the other providers. Cogent are > not that good that you would want to do that. > > Den 2. mar. 2017 20.16 skrev "Jeff Waddell" <jeff+nanog@waddellsolutions. > com > >: > > Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any routes > they don't ha

Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent

Or at least ask for a full view from Cogent - then you won't get any routes they don't have On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On jeu. 2 mars 12:36:04 2017, Aaron Gould wrote: > > Well, I asked my (3) upstream providers to only send me a ipv6 default >

Re: CenturyLink in Advanced Talks to Merge With Level 3 Communications - Interweb is doomed

We were on on 4323 - we are still peered to 4323 (from a config stand point) - but the world sees us thru 3549 It is a mess on convergence On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:24 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > On 10/28/16 12:18 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: > > Level3 hasn't even finished migrating

Level 3 GBLX / Legacy Twt IPv6 Issue

I am having an issue where since the the old twt convergence by Level 3 to the GBLX network/AS3549 our v6 prefix isn't being announced outside of Level 3. I have had a ticket open for a week and had one engineer who seemed to be on to fixing it (regarding an export policy) but then that went