On 25/02/2012, at 12:59 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Jeffrey S. Young yo...@jsyoung.net wrote:
1. Make your customers register routes, then filter them.
(may be time for big providers to put routing tools into
open source for the good of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/05/2011, at 2:53 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
On 5/4/2011 12:26 PM, Tim Franklin wrote:
I think that George's POV -- which is also mine -- is that as the
world shifts, the percentage of video distribution which is
amenable to multicast, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/05/2011, at 1:33 PM, George Bonser wrote:
f there are 10,000 Comcast subscribers watching exactly the same live
event on the net, sending 10,000 streams of exactly the same data is
dumb and it doesn't have to be that way.
IMHO,
It's
Well,
I don't work for the NBN, but I do live here and follow the politics with
interest.
So far the 'experiment' is on track. The political parties who support the NBN
are the majority by a slim margin (2 or 3 seats) and the project seems to be
going forward. Most recently legislation passed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/11/2010, at 9:28 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/level-3-communications-issues-statement-concerning-comcasts-actions-2010-11-29?reflink=MW_news_stmp
I understand that politics is off-topic, but this policy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
At the time these statements were made it was possible to make reasonable
assumptions about the size of the Internet. As a Tier 1 knew how much traffic
our
customer links generated by the size of the link. We knew exactly how much
traffic
OK, I'll throw in my $.02,
It really doesn't matter what any of us say, anecdotes from NANOG will not
stop your CEO/CFO or worse your CMO from directing you to use HP.
You have only two choices. The first is to engage in war of the PowerPoints
during which you and the HP account team inform the
Having met more than a few people in government IT, all jokes aside,
I think they're pretty well equipped to know when and if they need to
disconnect from the Internet, even without an executive order. Like
many things in Washington, this all may be an attempt to put the
public
at ease by
want to put in ACLs because you'd blow out
the cpu on the router/card?
Ah... That made networking fun!
Deepak
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Young yo...@jsyoung.net
To: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Cc: Paul Vixie vi...@isc.org; na...@merit.edu na...@merit.edu
Sent: Sat Apr 18 20
Best solution I ever saw to an 'unintended' third-party
peering was devised by a pretty brilliant guy (who can
pipe up if he's listening). When he discovered traffic
loads coming from non-peers he'd drop in an ACL that
blocked everything except ICMP - then tell the NOC to
route the call to his
This comes from Lauren Weinstein's list and it's worth a read.
It's a bill introduced into legislation, who knows where and when
and if it will become law but, wow.
http://lauren.vortex.com/Cyber-S-2009.pdf
I'll just give you a teaser:
SEC. 9. SECURE DOMAIN NAME ADDRESSING SYSTEM.
3 (a)
Ramasubramanian ops.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jeff Young yo...@jsyoung.net wrote:
This comes from Lauren Weinstein's list and it's worth a read.
It's a bill introduced into legislation, who knows where and when
and if it will become law but, wow.
http://lauren.vortex.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
