Of course, Comcast sells its own VoIP services, which I'll bet work just
fine; so they don't have a huge incentive to go out of their way to make
their competitors' product work on their network.
Jim Shankland
On 9/11/24 2:19 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
How can such a lar
from (and to) that office over an encrypted
tunnel to our nearby datacenter. Go figure. This was Comcast business
service, with a publicly routed (i.e., not RFC 1918) /27 allocated to it.
Jim Shankland
On 9/10/24 2:22 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
We've just moved to tunneling anything VoIP
That is extremely good and important advice! It seemed much less
pertinent back when I was in my 30's, but planning for the unexpected
is, or should be, a key part of all our jobs.
Jim Shankland
On 9/26/23 10:01 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
One thing you should consider about running a &q
matter of
principle there: it should be possible to have an email account without
having all the emails stored by a third party. If the answer ends up
being, "Oh, just use gmail, everybody else does!" ... well, so be it, I
guess, but we should be clear that something got lost in that tran
For me, that's easiest to do with Linux or MacOS (terminal). But sure,
if "open on a Linux machine" still means "point and click", then you're
absolutely correct.
Jim Shankland
obsolete protocol" is using a
normative, rather than empirical, definition of "obsolete". In the
empirical sense, things are obsolete when people stop using them. Tine
will tell when that happens.
Jim Shankland
On 11/8/19 10:34 AM, Kain, Becki (.) wrote:
Esp on Valentine’s day. Of all the days that clear communication is
important. I’d be very interested in their reasoning for why these
messages were not sent and held.
Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Hope we're still together
When this reaches
On 8/17/19 3:16 PM, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jim Shankland <mailto:na...@shankland.org>> wrote:
I'm seeing slow-motion (a few per second, per IP/port pair) syn flood
attacks ostensibly originating from 3 NL-based IP blocks:
88.20
On 8/16/19 3:50 PM, Emille Blanc wrote:
Have been seeing these at $DAYJOB off and on for the past week.
First logged events began for on 2019-08-04, at approx 1500hrs PST.
Impact for us has been negligible, but some older ASA's were having trouble
with the scan volume and their configured log l
Greetings,
I'm seeing slow-motion (a few per second, per IP/port pair) syn flood
attacks ostensibly originating from 3 NL-based IP blocks: 88.208.0.0/18
, 5.11.80.0/21, and 78.140.128.0/18 ("ostensibly" because ... syn flood,
and BCP 38 not yet fully adopted).
Why is this syn flood different
On 5/15/18 2:34 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:47:50PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
TL;DR = Don't use HTML email [snip]
That's enough right there. HTML markup in email is used exclusively
by three kinds of people: (1) ignorant newbies who don't know any
better (2)
On 4/4/18 7:44 AM, Sean Pedersen wrote:
Yep. Add it to the list of IRS scams, fake arrest warrants, credit repair, free
vacations, etc. The rate of calls has increased dramatically in the past year, especially
with the "neighborhood scam" where they spoof their CLID to a local area code
and pr
On 3/7/18 9:00 AM, Ian Mock wrote:
Everything is negotiable. NRC on a cross-connect is ridiculous. The cost to
run should be made up with the amount they're charging monthly. I wouldn't
pay more than $200/mo for copper.
Actually, as a reflection of the provider's cost, NRC for a
cross-connect m
On 6/20/17 8:15 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
The real question here is: will my NIC support other SFP+ modules than the
few options carried by the NIC vendor?
For example Intel claims the Intel NICs can only accept SFP+ modules by
Intel. They probably do not make optics themselves and only have fe
On 10/9/16 11:30 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2016 18:05:20 -, Mel Beckman said:
I don't know why it's "sub optimal" to use the cloud from an isolated network.
Can you elaborate?
Why should something out in the cloud have any part of the communication,
other than perha
Also, this jumped out at me:
"The problem with the recent attack is that the originating IP addresses
were evenly distributed within the IPV4 universe," McAfee says. "This is
virtually impossible using spoofing."
Am I missing something, or is an even distribution of originating IP
addresses
On 4/13/15 8:17 PM, Joe Klein wrote:
Was in a meeting over 4 years ago, where the people from Verizon were
claiming they would be rolling out IPv6 for FIOS in the following years.
Still waiting.
C
For those of us of a certain age, I'm wondering: what was the year when
you first heard that the e
On 1/26/15 11:33 PM, Pavel Odintsov wrote:
Hello!
Looks like somebody want to build Linux soft router!) Nice idea for
routing 10-30 GBps. I route about 5+ Gbps in Xeon E5-2620v2 with 4
10GE cards Intel 82599 and Debian Wheezy 3.2 (but it's really terrible
kernel, everyone should use modern kerne
On 10/19/14 2:03 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
This was my recollection as well. Many corporate PBXes failed, and as
it happened, for some reason, the mobile towers functioned with excess
capacity, to the point where I had a line coming out of my car. Best
form of communication into and out of the regi
kidding, but still )
Jim Shankland
row and eat their own food
surely eat better, and more cheaply, than those who buy at the
supermarket; but it's not for everybody.
Jim Shankland
l may contain very personal or
sensitive
information, and we will do everything we can to make sure that it
is safe.
I find this completely reassuring. I'd expand on that, but I have to go
buy a used car now.
Jim Shankland
kets is the low-hanging
fruit. (9K packets? That's the fruit that falls off the tree and
into your basket while you're napping :-).) The more interesting limit:
how many 40-byte packets per second can you shovel into this system
and still have all of them come out the other end?
Jim Shankland
t there
that send out their content with the DF bit set, then drop the
"fragmentation required" ICMP packets they get back on the floor.)
Jim Shankland
he thought of *any* culture in which attempts to deviate
"just do not occur" a little unnerving.
Jim Shankland
http://blog.oliver-gassner.de/archives/225-Guenter-Eich,-Traeume.html
aside from that, they've been fine. (This is transit in San Francisco
at the gigabit-plus level.)
Jim Shankland
Chris wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry if this is a repeat topic. I've done a fair bit of trawling but can't
find anything concrete to base decisions on.
I'm hoping someone can offer some advice on suitable hardware and kernel
tweaks for using Linux as a router running bgpd via Quagga. We do this at
the mom
pontaneous, permanent change.
Nvidia NICs ... as my mother said, if you can't say anything nice,
don't say anything at all. So the rest is silence.
Jim Shankland
his concludes today's presentation from the history channel.
Jim Shankland
come as news to anyone on this list that the world
of SMTP is hardly well-defined or well-regulated in practice.
Like Rowlf the dog, we can't live with it, we can't live without
it, but we're stuck until something better comes along:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vvV9LjBsNw
Jim Shankland
acy blocks.
For what it's worth
Jim Shankland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:32:39 PDT, Jim Shankland said:
> > *No* security gain? No protection against port scans from Bucharest?
> > No protection for a machine that is used in practice only on the
> > local, office LAN? Or to access a singl
on of ignorant, stupid, and reckless; the Linux
box for some reason remained unmolested.
Jim Shankland
33 matches
Mail list logo
