Re: IPv6 woes - RFC

2021-09-26 Thread Jim Young via NANOG
On Saturday, September 25, 2021 21:55 Chris Adams wrote: > More than once, I've had to explain why zero-filling octets, like > 127.000.000.001 (which still works) or 008.008.008.008 (which does not), > is broken. Zero filling IPv4 is just evil. How about this party trick? > % ping -c 1

Re: DoD IP Space

2021-01-20 Thread Jim Young via NANOG
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 13:48, Owen DeLong <...> wrote: > > Do you think this still holds true if DoD were to (e.g.) sell that space > to $CLOUD_PROVIDER or $ISP or $SUPPLIER or…? > > I don’t have any knowledge of any events surrounding this space > currently, but I do know that press