Re: Google Fiber abuse address does not exist

Hey Chris, Thanks for reporting this. We had an issue that caused emails to addresses in that domain to not be recognized. The email is no longer bouncing back, and emails to other googlefiber.net addresses are confirmed working. Louie On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:58 PM Chris Boyd wrote: > Can

Re: Bottlenecks and link upgrades

Beyond a pure percentage, you might want to account for the time it takes you stay below a certain threshold. If you want to target a certain link to keep your 95th percentile peaks below 70%, then first get an understanding of your traffic growth and try to project when you will reach that

Re: Google Fiber (KC) NOC contact

Hey Blake, Thanks for reaching out. I’m the IP Address Manager. Since this is more a matter of the CPE or local gateway router configuration, I’ve referred the matter to our Operation team to follow up on. FYI, our frontline call center does escalate matters rather promptly after a report is

Re: AS4134/AS4847 - Appear to be hijacking some ip space.

Hey folks, I'm on it for solving both immediate issue and long term "fix". Louie -- Louie Lee, 李景雲 Peering Coordinator (AS16591 ) Network Capacity Manager IP Numbers Administrator Google Fiber lou...@google.com (650) 253-2847 *There are 10 types of people

Re: modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand

Certainly. Projecting demand is one thing. Figuring out what to buy for your backbone, edge (uplink & peer), and colo (for CDN caches too!), for which scale+growth is quite another. And yeah, Jim, overall, things have stayed the same. There are just the nuances added with caches, gaming, OTT

Re: modeling residential subscriber bandwidth demand

+1 Also on this. >From my viewpoint, the game is roughly the same for the last 20+ years. You might want to validate that your per-customer bandwidth use across your markets is roughly the same for the same service/speeds/product. If you have that data over time, then you can extrapolate what