Rich Kulawiec wrote (on Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:25:20AM -0400):
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:38:17AM -0300, jim deleskie wrote:
As to his decision to block Gmail (or any other freemail provider),
everyone with sufficient knowledge in the field knows that these
operations are prolific and
Does anyone have any information (beyond the wimpy statement that
technical issues were to blame) on the Chase outage?
It seems that when a multibillion dollar company's major web site is
down for more than a day, there must be juicy technical issues that
beg to be told. So, can anyone dish? :-)
Zaid Ali wrote (on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:27:40AM -0700):
Isn't that reserved for beer sessions at NANOG?
Bummer. I heard they don't lawyers into the beer sessions. :-)
On 9/16/10 9:13 AM, N. Yaakov Ziskind aw...@ziskind.us wrote:
Does anyone have any information (beyond the wimpy
Jon Lewis wrote (on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:44:02PM -0400):
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Reese wrote:
A friend brought this to my attention:
http://ipq.co/
He saw it at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1678324
I'm not sure whether to shriek in joy or in pain. Will data from
this service -
[attribution removed, as I lost track of who said what]
Do you now. Unfortunately, the plain language of the LRSA does not
respect your belief.
ARIN makes only two promises about the application of existing and new
ARIN policies to LRSA signatories: ARIN will take no action to reduce
The best place to ask this question is on usenet:comp.unix.sco.misc.
jacob miller wrote (on Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 11:40:27PM -0700):
Hi,
Am getting the following error from my SCO UNIX box.
Any idea as to what they mean.
proto: 0, age: 1274191185
locks: inits:
sockaddrs:
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote (on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 06:27:09AM -0400):
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 05:39:43 EDT, N. Yaakov Ziskind said:
The best place to ask this question is on usenet:comp.unix.sco.misc.
This is, of course, if you can find a still-functional usenet server. ;)
If not, there's
William Pitcock wrote (on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 01:45:18AM -0500):
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 23:40 -0700, jacob miller wrote:
Hi,
Am getting the following error from my SCO UNIX box.
They mean use an operating system not made by crackheads. There's a
reason why SCO switched from UNIX sales
David Hubbard wrote (on Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:07:05AM -0400):
From: William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us]
It's like government services for the elderly. Though today many are a
net drain on society, they've mostly earned their place with past
action and it's the decent and
Just curious: why not set up a separate entity to apply for IPv6 space?
Do you get a cheaper fee (or other brownie points) if you already have
an allocation?
John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote (on Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:59:30PM -0500):
Yah, thats what we are thinking here. We'll probably stick with
I don't think the issue is *money* (at least the big issue; money is
*always* an issue), but rather the all-of-sudden jump from being
unregulated to regulated, whatever that means. I would think multiple
times before making that jump. Hence my suggestion to set up a separate
organization to
Larry Sheldon wrote (on Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:28:03AM -0600):
On 2/23/2010 4:39 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
Maybe politicians should just keep their nose out of things that they
can't understand. Email addresses aren't phone numbers.
It occurs to me that maybe there is a reason why
Jack Bates wrote (on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:52:01AM -0500):
John van Oppen wrote:
I think that is a pretty standard procedure. We generally give our
users 12 hours to remove the content before we null-route the IP...
The only time this does not apply is with active spam sources, simple
and
Why is there *never* a moderator around when you need one? :-)
Mike Lieman wrote (on Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 09:37:42PM -0400):
Copyright Laws, are just that. Laws. And the can be changed if The People
desire it.
The issue I see with copyright TODAY is that there is effectively no entry
of
JC Dill wrote (on Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:02:25AM -0700):
Ross wrote:
There seems to be a big misconception that he asked them to hand over
the info. As I read the OP, he asked Comcast to do something about it
and Comcast said we can't do anything about it because we don't have
logs.
That's one of the reasons many of them incorporate as non-profits...
Under the tax laws of most countries, the U.S. and Canada included,
non-profits are legaly protected against acquisition by for-profits.
Do any of these operations post their tax returns online?
-M
They might be
16 matches
Mail list logo
