RE: Court orders for blocking of streaming services

2022-05-08 Thread Philip Loenneker
I'm not very clear on the laws around much of this discussion, but I've been following this with interest. I have a tongue-in-cheek question... if the documentation provided by the plaintiff to the court, and/or the court documentation including the final ruling, includes the specific URLs to

RE: ISP data collection from home routers

2022-03-24 Thread Philip Loenneker
It sounds like the kind of data you can retrieve through TR-069. To be able to use it, you have to either log on to the router and set the TR-069 server, or push out the setting via DHCP, which means you need to have layer 2 access to the device. This limits the ability to apply/change the

RE: (Free)RADIUS Front-End

2021-09-19 Thread Philip Loenneker
Splynx is a commercial product designed to be an entire package for running an ISP, including billing etc. It uses FreeRadius in the backend which chains into their own RADIUS system. Integration for MikroTik routers is very extensive, but we have had it working with a variety of other BNGs too

RE: BGP and The zero window edge

2021-04-21 Thread Philip Loenneker
I'm not sure if this is helpful to this discussion or not, but I recently became aware of a bug in a virtual router using DPDK+VPP which sounds like it could possibly produce a similar issue to what is being described, without the TCP window being a factor. The system used the same process to

RE: cheap MPLS router recommendations

2020-10-27 Thread Philip Loenneker
While I like MikroTik, I don’t recommend anyone uses it for MPLS. There are problems with the way they handle labels that causes random connectivity issues, and can crash MPLS devices from other vendors. That’s from experience. As an example, check out this post which was started back in 2013

RE: Linux router network cards

2020-10-20 Thread Philip Loenneker
It's heavily targeting virtualised workloads but some of the feature sets apply to bare-metal uses too. Regards, Philip Loenneker | Senior Network Engineer | TasmaNet -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of micah anderson Sent: Wednesday, 21 October 2020 2:37 PM To: nanog@nanog.org

RE: MAP-E

2019-08-04 Thread Philip Loenneker
Moving away from the discussion around what technology people may choose to go with, and instead what CPEs may be suitable... I know this is 464XLAT rather than MAP-E that was originally requested, but recent versions of D-Link firmware, eg for the DVA-2800, include the CLAT functionality. My

RE: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform

2019-01-20 Thread Philip Loenneker
/download/TR-143.pdf Regards, Philip Loenneker | Network Engineer | TasmaNet From: Colton Conor Sent: Saturday, 19 January 2019 1:34 AM To: Philip Loenneker Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform Philip, Which TR-069 tools are you referring to? I looked at TR-143

RE: Network Speed Testing and Monitoring Platform

2019-01-17 Thread Philip Loenneker
here”. TR-069 also has a lot of other advantages which you can easily discover with a quick search. Regards, Philip Loenneker | Network Engineer | TasmaNet From: NANOG On Behalf Of Colton Conor Sent: Friday, 18 January 2019 12:17 AM To: James Bensley Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Network Speed Testing

RE: Stupid Question maybe?

2018-12-18 Thread Philip Loenneker
I had a heck of a time a few years back trying to troubleshoot an issue where an upstream provider had an ACL with an incorrect mask along the lines of 255.252.255.0. That was really interesting to talk about once we discovered it, though it caused some loss of hair beforehand... -Original

RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

2018-10-11 Thread Philip Loenneker
Sent: Friday, 12 October 2018 2:39 PM To: NANOG Subject: Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:08 PM Brock Tice mailto:br...@bmwl.co>> wrote: On 10/09/2018 06:24 PM, Philip Loenneker wrote: > I have asked several vendors we deal with about the newer tec

RE: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

2018-10-10 Thread Philip Loenneker
Hi Tom, This article is now 11 months old, but may be of interest to you: https://blog.apnic.net/2017/11/09/ce-vendors-share-thoughts-ipv6-support/ Some quotes: * The major issue is the lack of support provided by CE vendors for both older (DS-Lite, lw4o6), and newer (464XLAT, MAP T/E)