Re: Undersea cable damages in the Atlantic?

2022-01-18 Thread Rob Evans
Also FWIW, we've been informed of outages on TGN-EA (since 15/01/22)
and IMEWE (since 15/10/21), both "away from the Mumbai coast." No ETR
currently available.

Rob


Re: Alien waves

2021-07-22 Thread Rob Evans
Hi,

Alien wavelengths is a fairly old concept and more generally just
refers to running any wavelength over a DWDM system that isn't
generated by that system's own transponders.

These days it is more about leasing spectrum (Spectrum as a Service),
but that comes in several different flavours.  There is the basic "I
want access to 250GHz of C-band to light in whatever way I want",
which only tends to happen between consenting networks (e.g. in the
R space, or between trusted providers), or as trials due to the
risks that ytti mentioned.  That could be a single contiguous
superchannel of spectrum if you have a colourless/flexgrid add/drop
system, or 5 x 50GHz individual channels.

At the other end of the spectrum (ahem) is managed transponders.  This
is more suitable for, e.g., the submarine case.  You have guaranteed
access to a certain amount of spectrum, but the transponders go into
the fibre owner's DWDM equipment and are managed by them and you
connect to the transponder in much the same way as a traditional
circuit.  You can theoretically upgrade as newer transponders come out
that use spectrum more efficiently, or as demand requires it for a
nominal (!) fee to cover the hardware and engineering.

There are options between those models, but it's rarely a pricebook
item at the moment and will need to be discussed with the providers.
It's also usually intended for fairly large requirements.

Cheers,
Rob


Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news

2018-05-17 Thread Rob Evans

I don't.  I have better things to do than babysit various accounts
I've signed up over the years.  Just because someone signs up for an
account and forgets about it is not a good enough reason to have my
information DESTROYED WITHOUT MY PERMISSION if I do happen to be busy
that week to sign in somewhere to accept a legal disclaimer.


It’s only ‘{one|that} week’ from today.  The people that hold your 
personal data appear to have not planned in advance.


Why should people (“data processors”) have the right to forward your 
personal contact details in perpetuity?  Isn’t that a problem?  They 
don’t need to ask permission to use those details for purposes for 
which you’ve already granted permission.



GDPR is touted as a policy to tackle the issue of the larger players
abusing their market positions and our trust; instead, so far, my lack
of response would just ensure that I am unsubscribed from my alumni
association in the UK; what good does it do to me?!


This may be a misunderstanding, or a cautious approach, from your alma 
mater.  If you’ve given them permission for them to hold your data 
about their activities all is well.  Many companies are choosing this as 
an opportunity to confirm that permission for the sake of future legal 
argument.


Rob


Re: Cogent BCP-38

2017-08-29 Thread Rob Evans
> Well, if you are using public IP addresses for infra you are violating your 
> RIR’s policy more than likely.

[Citation needed.] :)

Rob



Re: BBC reports Kenya fiber break

2012-02-29 Thread Rob Evans
 Constantly shifting ice shelves and glaciers make a terrestrial cable
 landing very difficult to implement on Antarctica.  Satellite connectivity
 is likely the only feasible option.  There are very few places in
 Antarctica that are reliably ice-free enough of the time to make a viable
 terrestrial landing station.  Getting connectivity from the landing station
 to other places on the continent is another matter altogether.

The British Antarctic Survey certainly use (used) satellite:

http://www.antarctica.ac.uk/bas_research/techniques/tech7.php

They gave a good presentation about it a couple of years ago:

http://webmedia.company.ja.net/content/documents/shared/networkshop300310/blake_theuseofnetworksinthepolarregions.pdf

Cheers,
Rob



Re: Cogent IPv6

2011-06-09 Thread Rob Evans
 Please don't use /127:

 Use of /127 Prefix Length Between Routers Considered Harmful
    http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3627

Do keep up. :-)

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6164

Rob



Re: Packet over SONET failback

2011-02-14 Thread Rob Evans
 PoS failure detection happens in under 50ms, but what about the failback?  
 Same deal?  I ask because I've got two routers connected to opposite ends of 
 a spare PoS link that I've been playing with and I'm noticing that the 
 failback on the far side seems to be about 15 seconds (assuming the near side 
 failover was initiated with an interface shutdown command and thusly no 
 shut'd to re-enable the link).

I think there are a couple of issues at play here.  First of all,
SONET/SDH restoration happens at layer 1, whereas it looks like you're
waiting for a router to reroute.  Your reroute times will be tied to
recalculation of IGPs.

Secondly, is this with a Cisco?  Try setting pos ais-shut on both
sides.  Unless you do that, the router won't generate and AIS, and it
will take the encapsulation timeout (HDLC, PPP) for the interface on
the other side to go down and signal that to the routing protocols on
top.

Rob



Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN

2011-02-03 Thread Rob Evans
 You must be kiddin'... You're considering going through this mess again
 in a few decades?

I'm mildly surprised if you think we're going to be done with *this*
mess in a few decades.

Rob



Re: ISP customer assignments

2009-10-16 Thread Rob Evans
 This is a bit annoying though, yeah. But, I'm not sure I can think of a good
 solution that doesn't involve us changing the routing system so that we can
 handle a huge amount of intentional de-aggregates or something.

Within the RIPE region we're currently discussing a document on IPv6
route aggregation that acknowledges there are cases where it may be
necessary to break up a /32 into a limited number of smaller blocks.
Following discussion at the meeting last week I need to revise it, but
the previous draft is here:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/routing-wg/2009/msg00120.html

Cheers,
Rob



Re: Outages in wales ?

2009-07-18 Thread Rob Evans
 but a buddy in wales have massive problems with internet connectivity

For those that don't know, Wales is a relatively small constituent
country of the United Kingdom (size-wise, it is 'about the size of
Wales'):

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_size_of_Wales

Small as it is, it has a number of different internet providers using
ADSL, cable, leased lines and DWDM.  For it to be on NANOG, I assume
there is reason to believe the outage is widespread and your buddy has
already contacted their Internet Service Provider?  For what is is
worth, I'm not seeing any outages to the academic sites in Wales.

Or maybe there has been a bit of storm which has blown it 3,500 miles
to the west.  If it has, please look after it, especially mid-Wales
and North Wales, they really are quite beautiful. :)

Best regards,
Rob



Re: IPv4 Anycast?

2009-04-22 Thread Rob Evans
 Then there is basically no inter-As anycast besides the anycast prefix for
 DNS root, since I only noticed like 8 prefixes that are announced by more
 than 3 ASes..

...but inter-domain anycast is often achieved by using a single origin
AS, which is then transited through the 'provider' autonomous systems.
 In which case, you may be looking for the wrong thing.

Rob



Re: Google Over IPV6

2009-03-27 Thread Rob Evans
 When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user
 feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public
 fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are
 tunneling, and to where.

They are peering over some IXPs and private peerings with native IPv6,
and I believe Google like to check IPv6 connectivity before putting
your DNS resolver addresses in a whitelist so  records are
returned.

Regards,
Rob



Re: Dynamic IP log retention = 0?

2009-03-12 Thread Rob Evans
 Not to disagree with any of your points, but the OP (which you quoted!)
 was talking about Covad, while you're bashing Comcast.

Any sufficiently advanced NANOG conversation is indistinguishable from
Comcast-bashing.

Rob

(Not agreeing, just observing.)



Re: Mcast mpeg2 and unicast h.264 for NANOG-45

2009-01-26 Thread Rob Evans
 25 mbit HDV, mpeg Transport Stream, UDP: 233.0.59.45 port 1234

 Not seeing the mcast feed at all.  What's the source address so we can try
 to mtrace to it?

I see it from: 128.104.23.100 (kona.doit.wisc.edu).

Cheers,
Rob



Re: Is it time to abandon bogon prefix filters?

2008-08-06 Thread Rob Evans
 I see a number of hits on those entries, especially on 94/8.  and 0/8.

You do know that 94/8 has been assigned to the RIPE NCC, right? :-)

Cheers,
Rob