On 5/20/2016 7:43 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
'lo all,
Is anybody out there aware of a piece of software that can take data from an
arbitrary source and then present it, using a MIB or set of OIDs of your
choosing, as an SNMP-interrogatable device?
We have some CPE that supports SNMP, but
I've been on hold a few times with some companies that had great 80's
music. I almost asked them to put me back on hold when they finally
took me off. Sometimes it's a party when one of the people on the call
hits the hold button, it depends on how bad the outage is :)
On 4/6/2016 4:56 PM,
This is a program for logging into devices. You can find it here:
https://github.com/rfdrake/tel
I don't like to self promote things, but I'm interested in feedback.
I'm also interested in alternatives if someone wrote something better.
I started it a long time ago as a lighter clogin
On 2/22/2016 5:03 AM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
I'm wondering how did we made "Temporary and conditionnal liabality
transfer" a synonym of "perpetual and inconditional usufruct transfer".
May you please enlight me ?
There are always ways around the system. I suspect what has happened is
that
OpenNMS has direct support for SNMP traps and multistage alerting. It's
a pain in the ass to setup (depending on what you're doing*) but it's
free and very high performance.
* if all your MIBS are already supported then 90% of the work is done
and it's not so bad. Just setup multistage
On 2/2/2016 5:02 AM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
No inside pictures :)
Assuming that this is really an USB device, and that the console port is
really an USB host port, it would be useful to know the USB decriptors
of the device. You wouldn't be willing to connect it to a Linux PC and
run "lsusb -vd",
This is from some internal PHP thing that isn't very good (well, it's
lovely actually.. the problem is that it uses a forking method to query
everything and isn't that fast. I'm trying to rewrite it)
Throw any of these into google if you're confused about them. It should
return the correct
OpenNMS has a poller that will do what you want. The problem is
figuring out what you wish to collect and how to use it. Most of the
time it's not as simple as pointing at the modem and saying go.
I've added a few oids for some of the modems we support, just so I can
get SNR on them. I
On 9/4/2015 6:31 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
I, for one, feel your pain in this matter. When I was a consultant in
The Bad Ol' Days, I had so many telephone numbers where I *could* be
that my .sig would be a run-on one as well. As a compromise, I had my
cell number and a hyperlink to a
I was going to look at this because it sounded interesting. Maybe some
extra things it could do would be to set div/classes in some parts of
the config to denote what it is so that the user could apply css to
style it. That would allow user-defined color syntax highlighting of a
sort.
On 8/2/2015 3:53 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I think the body text of the message should identify it as coming from the
Bright House email system? I think it should be written in standard USAdian
English, which that is decidedly not.
Or perhaps the problem is that that subject line was supposed
On 7/17/2015 4:26 AM, Alexander Maassen wrote:
Well, this block also affects people who have old management hardware
around using such ciphers that are for example no longer supported. In my
case for example the old Dell DRAC's. And it seems there is no way to
disable this block.
Ok, it is
On 7/7/2015 5:39 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
Unclear at best. The way it is implemented, the user has the potential
to go either way. A network might not want the user to have the
choice, clearly, but there is certainly a subset of users who will opt
out of the feature and I cannot see how those
On 6/9/2015 11:14 AM, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
We are looking particularly at combinations of the following IGPs:
IS-IS, OSPFv2, OSPFv3, EIGRP.
If you run something else (RIP?) then we would also like to hear about
this, though we will likely document these differently. [We suspect
you run
Like the Automated Copyright Notice System
(http://www.acns.net/spec.html) except I don't think they went through
any official standards body besides their own MPAA, or whatever.
I get circuits from several vendors and get maintenance notifications
from them all the time. Each has a
For larger DC devices with ~50amps per side, does anyone have a software
accessible way to turn off power?
I've looked into PDU's but the ones I find have a max of 10amps.
I've considered building something with solenoids or a rotary actuator
that would turn the switches on or off, but that's
On 12/29/2014 10:32 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
My fear would be we would hire an outsourced tech. After a certain
amount of time we would have to let this part timer go, and would
disabled his or her username and password in TACAS. However, if that
tech still knows the root password they could
On 12/28/2014 10:21 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
and I wonder what percentage of 'users' a vendor has actually USE tac+
(or even radius). I bet it's shockingly low...
true.. even in large-ish environments centralized authentication
presents problems and can have a limited merit. Up to some
Picking back up where this left off last year, because I apparently only
work on TACACS during the holidays :)
On 12/30/2013 7:28 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Even 5 seconds extra for each command may hinder operators, to the extent
it would be intolerable; shell commands should run almost
On 11/18/2014 8:11 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
We need to come up with some sort of international Abuse Reduction and
Reporting Engagement Suite of Tools as a Service.
M.
I've been considering a post for a couple of weeks but decided most of
my complaints were petty. I've been getting lots of
On 7/31/2014 12:07 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
1. The article mentioned DHCP doesn't do the other part of what PPPoE or
PPPoA does, which is generate RADIUS accounting records that give us the
bandwidth information. So that’s one of the main challenges in switching to
a DHCP based system. So, how
On 7/29/2014 12:42 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that practice.
As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my communications had been
intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user.
--Chris
Usually, unless the judge is
On 7/29/2014 6:42 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
Of course, getting anything back*out* of that again in any sort of
reasonable timeframe would be... optimistic. I suppose if you're storing it
all in hadoop you can map/reduce your way out of trouble, but that's going
to mean a lot of equipment sitting
On 7/11/2014 11:38 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Well... if you make a phone call to a rural area, or a 3rd world
country, with a horrible system, is it your telco's responsibility to
go out there and fix it?
One might answer, of course not. It's a legitimate position, and by
this argument,
On 7/6/2014 5:07 PM, Daniel van der Steeg wrote:
Hello all,
I have implemented two EEM Policies using TCL on a Cisco Catalyst 6500,
both of them running every X seconds. Now I am trying to find a way to
monitor the CPU and memory usage of these policies, to determine their
footprint. Does
On 6/30/2014 1:59 AM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
Hi all,
I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have
done on this list.
I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile
NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind.
I am looking at a Cisco
On 6/9/2014 11:00 PM, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
I found many ISP announced bogon prefix, for example:
OriginAS Announcement Description
AS7018 172.116.0.0/24unallocated
AS209 209.193.112.0/20 unallocated
my question is why the tier1 and other ISP announce these unallocated
bogon
On 6/2/2014 1:42 PM, Brian Rak wrote:
They do publish it. The problem is, it's not documented, and it takes
a bunch of work to get into a usable state.See
ftp://ftp.supermicro.com/GPL/SMT/SDK_SMT_X9_317.tar.gz
Plus, the firmware environment is pretty hostile. If you flash some
bad
On 5/7/2014 9:47 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
The bar for an informational RFC is pretty darned low. I don't see
anything in the datagram nature of i'm alive, don't pull the trigger
yet that would preclude a UDP packet rather than naked IP. Hell,
since it's not supposed to leave the LAN, one could
On 4/29/2014 10:54 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
Yeah, just when we thought Slammer / Blaster / Nachi / Welchia / etc /
etc had been eliminated by process of can't get there from here... we
expose millions more endpoints...
/me ducks too (but you know *I* had to say it)
Slammer actually caused many
On 5/1/2014 7:10 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Pardon my ignorance here. But in a carrier-grade NAT implementation that
serves say 5000 users, when happens when someone from the outside tries
to connect to port 80 of the shared routable IP ? you still need to
have explicit port forwarding to
On 4/11/2014 5:47 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
That's not DNSSEC that's broken, then. - Matt
You're correct about that, but everything depends on your level of
paranoia.
The bug has a potential to show 64k of memory that may or may not be a
part of the TLS/SSL connection*. In that 64k their
On 4/3/2014 12:44 PM, Laurent CARON wrote:
Hi,
I bought a C3750G-12S which is now end of sale on cisco website. This
device is now defective.
Since I bought it from a reseller and not directly from cisco, cisco
is refusing to take it under warranty and tells me to have the
reseller take
On 3/31/2014 10:51 PM, Joe wrote:
I received several reports today regarding some scans for udp items from
shadowservers hosted out of H.E. Seems to claim to be checking for issues
regarding udp issues, amp issues, which I am all fine for, but my issue is
this. It trips several IDP/IPS traps
On 3/30/2014 12:11 AM, Barry Shein wrote:
I don't know what WKBI means and google turns up nothing. I'll guess
Well Known Bad Idea?
Since I said that I found the idea described above uninteresting I
wonder what is a WKBI from 1997? The idea I rejected?
Also, I remember ideas being shot down
On 3/28/2014 4:11 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
If a person is on multiple of *NOG mailing lists a lot of these're
received. For example, I got well over 30 of them this round. It'd be
nice to get something brief like this:
--
The Semiannual Cisco IOS
On 3/26/2014 10:16 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
and user@2001:db8::1.25 with user@192.0.2.1:25. Who had the good idea to use :
for IPv6 addresses while this is the separator for the port in IPv4? A few MTA
are confused by it.
At the network level the IPv6 address is just a big number. No
On 3/26/2014 11:28 PM, John Levine wrote:
It's messier than that. See RFC 5321 section 4.1.3. I have no idea
whether anyone has actually implemented IPv6 address literals and if
so, how closely they followed the somewhat peculiar spec.
R's,
John
I'm not sure why the SMTP RFC defines
On 2/28/2014 9:19 PM, Dale W. Carder wrote:
If I'm understanding what you're trying to do, you could script around
our rather unsophisticated 'sgrep' (stanza grep) tool combined with
scripting around rancid rcs to do what I think you are looking for.
On 2/26/2014 4:22 PM, Ryan Shea wrote:
Howdy network operator cognoscenti,
I'd love to hear your creative and workable solutions for a way to track
in-line the configuration revisions you have on your cisco-like devices.
Let me clearify/frame:
You have a set of tested/approved configurations
On 2/26/2014 5:33 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:44:55 -0600, Brandon Galbraith said:
Blocking chargen at the edge doesn't seem to be outside of the realm of
possibilities.
What systems are (a) still have chargen enabled and (b) common enough to make
it a viable
On 2/26/2014 5:37 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
Most people roll their own solution. If you're looking to do that
consider using augeas for parsing the configuration files. It can be
really useful for documenting changes, and probably to diff parts of
the config. You might also consider
On 2/26/2014 11:03 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
The well known port assignments are advisory or recommended, for use by
other unknown processes. the purpose of well known port
assignments is for service location; the port number is not a sequence of
application identification bits.
The QUIC
Cables and Kits is local to Atlanta and is great for last minute
orders. You can pickup there if needed.
http://www.cablesandkits.com/
On 2/21/2014 5:06 AM, Bobby Lacey wrote:
In Atlanta doing an install for a client this weekend and it appears that
the fiber/ethernet patch cables won't be
For future reference, the last time this issue came up someone said
doing this was a good way to get their geo stuff fixed automatically:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-google-self-published-geofeeds-02
I haven't messed with it yet, but it seems like a good idea. I want to
write something
On 2/18/2014 2:19 PM, James Milko wrote:
Is using data from a self-selected group even meaningful when
extrapolated? It's been a while since Stats in college, and it's very
likely the guys from MIT know more than I do, but one of the big things
they pushed was random sampling.
JM
Isn't it
On 2/5/2014 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I here tell the spoofer project people are looking to improve their data
and stats... And reporting.
I know it's not possible due to the limitations of javascript
sandboxing, but this really needs to be browser based so it can be like
DNSSEC or
Ever since first using it I've always liked tacacs+. Having said that
I've grown to dislike some things about it recently. I guess, there
have always been problems but I've been willing to leave them alone.
I don't have time to give the code a real deep inspection, so I'm
interested in
My suggestion is to use http://http.debian.net/debian as your source.
It uses geo thingie to figure out the closest mirror to you.
Code is on github if you're interested in how it works.
https://github.com/rgeissert/http-redirector
On 10/5/2013 11:11 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat,
Sorry for the noise, but I thought this might be of interest to anyone
waiting for their hotel confirmation:
NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from feport01.hiltonhhonors.net[63.122.201.171]:
450 4.7.1 ironport.hhonorscrm.net: Helo command rejected: Host not
found;
On 1/30/2013 9:10 PM, David Barak wrote:
IPv6 has been launched on all Arris DOCSIS 3.0 C4 CMTSes, covering
over 50% our network.
The update you sent is lovely, except I can tell you that the one (also an
Arris, running DOCSIS 3.0) which was installed in late October in my house in
On 1/16/2013 7:13 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I've noticed, for quite some time, that there seems to be a specific category
of slow that I see in using apps on my HTC Supersonic/Sprint EVO, on both
their 3G and 4G networks, and I wonder if it isn't because the defined
resolvers are 8.8.4.4 and
On Friday, January 11, 2013 8:29:23 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Many thanks. In particular, you need cable-source-verify dhcp to
prevent self assigned IPs that are unused by neighbours.
Is this something that is now basically a default for all cable
operators ? Or does this command add
On 10/29/2012 02:54 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
Bush league. I debugged a similar issue on Sprint's network about 15
years ago, also nailing it down to which router/router hop had the problem
When I was working for Sprint about 12 years ago, we had a circuit where
the customer complained that we
On 7/30/2012 1:42 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I'm sorry Panashe is upset by this rule. Interestingly, Your search - Panashe
Flack nanog - did not match any documents. So my guess is that a post from that
account has not happened before, meaning the post was moderated yet still made it
On 10/25/2011 11:17 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
But that applies to port 25 also, so, I'm not understanding the difference.
Other people running open port 587s tends to be quite self-correcting.
At this point, so do open port 25s.
The differences is in intentions from the user. All SMTP
On 10/25/2011 10:19 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
I didn't see anyone address this from the service provider abuse
department perspective. I think larger ISP's got sick and tired of
dealing with abuse reports or having their IP space blocked because of
their own (infected) residential users sending
On 5/10/2011 12:57 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
Your suggestion has two main disadvantages:
1) it doesn't work on some platforms, because input ACL won't stop ND
learn/solicit -- obviously this is bad
2) it requires you to configure a potentially large input ACL on every
single interface on the box,
58 matches
Mail list logo
