On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:06 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> Basically are there places that you can't get allocations? If so, what
> is happening?
In LAC region (LACNIC, NIC.br and NIC.mx), the controlled depletion phases
are now complete and the RIR reached 0 available IPv4 addresses,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:28 PM Rob McEwen wrote:
> A take on the 1979 movie "When A Stranger Calls" - "have you checked the
> children?" becomes "have you checked the IP registration?"
> [image: Have you checked the IP registration?]
> The vast majority of the time, Ron Guilmette does
YMMV, but my take:
1 - You should worry a little, but not much. Filters allowing unwanted
announcements might be created using these erroneous IRR records, but
they won't do any damage by themselves. An actual wrong BGP
announcement is required for any damage to happen, and even without
The only ones that like CL are the ones with no options. CL is now an
operational threat to the whole Internet due to their hours-long time
to withdraw routes, something that having other providers or not being
a direct customer doesn't prevent.
The outage that happened, while long, was the type
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 5:45 PM Mike Hale wrote:
> I've found it useful to email management if certain sales people refuse to
> stop contacting you.
My experience is that management of spammer companies tries arguing
it's not spam instead of changing practices.
And this includes so-called
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:01 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 12/Jul/20 17:19, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> Alternative routes before EllaLink comes into operation would be one of
> the Brazil-Africa cables (one to Cameroon, the other to Angola) and then to
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:06 PM Max Tulyev wrote:
> Hi All!
> Who can provide a VLAN from SaoPaolo to Frankfurt for remote IX.BR
> participation? Please contact me off-list.
> I see there is only one undersea cable going directly from Brazil to
> Europe. Why?
And this single cable,
> I've liked the price of the Ubiquiti switches I've seen, but haven't gotten
> to play with them, and based on their EdgeRouter line, am not sure about
> their maturity either.
A switch's maturity is much more dependent on hardware while a router is
much more dependent on software, so I
I don't see any RIR approving a bulk WHOIS request on a weekend alone, but
the way is like this:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 3:43 PM Lars Prehn wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Is there a "fast" way to obtain a snapshot of the RDAP databases from
> > This is a nice plot for a movie, but not how HFT is really done. It's so
> > much easier to colocate on the same datacenter of the exchange and run
> > algorithms from there; while those algorithms need humans to guide their
> > strategy, the human thought process takes a couple of seconds
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 5:05 PM Marshall Eubanks
> This was also pitched as one of the killer-apps for the SpaceX
> Starlink satellite array, particularly for cross-Atlantic and
> cross-Pacific trading.
Any default route to a non-ROV enabled upstream ?
Do you receive the test prefix from more than one upstream and the previous
test success could be a function of upstream ROV ?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:35 PM Baldur Norddahl
> I noticed that we regressed and started
> Outsourcing stuff like DNS is just a continuation of the trend of sending
> your workloads onto someone else's cloud. It seems easy -- right up until
> it isn't working the way you want it to.
Outsourcing DNS recursion isn't a good trade-off IMHO, but outsourcing
threat blocking via
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 1:10 PM Matt Corallo via NANOG
> That’s an interesting idea. I’m not sure that LACNIC would want to issue a
> ROA for RIPE IP space after RIPE issues an AS0 ROA, though. And you’d at
> least need some kind of time delay to give other RIRs and operators and
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 3:37 PM Denys Fedoryshchenko <
> There is simple use case that will prove this page is giving false
> for their "name" strategy.
> Any AS owner with default route only (yes it happens a lot) users will
> "YOUR ISP
> > As readier as the Internet is today, part of the mega spread of the
> > fallout from the Coronavirus is because information is not only
> > traveling way faster, a lot of it is also not (necessarily) verified or
> > moderated before being shared with is consumers.
> There is no
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:46 PM g...@1337.io wrote:
> With talk of there being an involuntary statewide (WA) and then national
> quarantines (house arrest) for multiple weeks, has anyone put thought into
> the impacts of this on your networks if/when this comes to fruition?
> We're already
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:30 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
> For anyone considering enabling DOH, I seriously recommend reviewing Paul
> Vixie’s keynote at SCaLE 18x Saturday morning.
> It contains a great deal of food for thought on a variety of forms
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:23 PM Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG <
> I can corroborate that. I visited China in August 2019 and had terrible
> internet performance to sites outside of China. This was both with mobile
> and wifi at the homes of two friends, one in Heilongjiang
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 12:49 PM Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG <
> uRPF loose or strict.
> Which ISP supports it?
> So far, I found none through public information.
With all IPv4 space converging to being allocated, loose uRPF is almost
useless at this point, or
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:17 PM Tom Hill wrote:
> On 09/01/2020 17:09, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> > But at least Cogent is not a security and/or anti-spam vendor (or is
> > it?). A security services company (iThreat) spammed all IANA gTLD
> > contacts this week, with the ever la
> Will Cogent stop pestering the community with illicitly harvested
> contact information? Will they switch to more nefarious tactics? Who
> knows... Everyone likes having money, after-all.
But at least Cogent is not a security and/or anti-spam vendor (or is it?).
A security services company
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:58 PM Keith Medcalf wrote:
> On NANOG list , Dan Hollis
> Operator of the dot-com registry, Verisign, has decided to pay DNS
> overseer ICANN $4m a year for the next five years in order to
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 12:16 PM Christopher Morrow
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 5:52 AM Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> >> > Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA
> that says that IRR objects on IRR source x with maint
> > Which brings me to my favorite possible RPKI-IRR integration: a ROA that
> says that IRR objects on IRR source x with maintainer Y are authoritative
> for a given number resource. Kinda like SPF for BGP.
> Is this required? or a crutch for use until a network can publish all
> of their
> RPKI ROAs (compared to IRR objects) carry different meaning: the existence
> of a ROA (both by definition and common implementation) supersedes other
> data sources (IRR, LOAs, or comments in whois records, etc), and as such
> can be used on any type of EBGP session for validation of the
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 5:55 PM Brielle wrote:
> On 11/18/2019 1:31 PM, Jared Geiger wrote:
> > This past Friday, the code for DANOS was released as open source to the
> > Linux Foundation and published at https://github.com/danos
> This is pretty awesome news.
> From what I'm reading, it
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:09 PM John Curran wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2019, at 11:15 AM, Valdis Klētnieks
> > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 02:42:09 -, John Curran said:
> >> You might want want to ask them why they are now a problem when they
> >> before (Also worth noting that
If it's not for an US company, then a Huawei NE-20 could be in order. The
entry model fits 2U.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 12:04 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> I am looking for some suggestions on alternatives to mx204.
> Any recommendations on something more affordable which
On Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 5:17 AM Scott Christopher wrote:
> John Curran wrote:
> As I have noted previously, I have zero doubt in the enforceability of the
> ARIN registration services agreements in this regard – so please carefully
> consider proposed policy both from the overall
It would be interesting if ICANN, Verisign and Afilias were able to join
the IX as well making the root and .com/.net/.org/.pr zones available even
if the island is cut off from the globe. There is so much fixation in bits
per second while IX'es are resiliency tools, more than bandwidth saving
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:56 PM William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 5:48 PM Keith Medcalf wrote:
>> If you have one such installation, then you really do not care about the
>> "accuracy" of the time. However if you have multiple such installations
>> then you want them all to have
Perhaps using a rubidium source instead of GPS ? The actual time can be
obtained thru NTP, all you actually need is a precision source to keep time
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 4:24 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> hey there Nanog,
> I am trying to buy a GPS based NTP server
While I hope you get the contact you asked for, you can use IX.br
communities to manipulate how your route announcement reaches them or not,
so that even with the lack of other network cooperation, you might be able
to achieve your goals.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:43 PM Siyuan Miao
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:14 AM John Levine wrote:
> In article <24679.1551146...@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> you write:
> >So what registries/registrars are supporting 2FA that's better than SMS?
> Opensrs does TOTP. It's certainly not bulletproof, but it's tied to
> your actual phone rather
On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:24 PM Yang Yu wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 12:05 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer
> > Is this problem also responsible for the 911 outage? If so, the
> > post-mortem analysis is not useful only for CenturyLink customers but
> > for everyone on the west coast.
They are both Telefónica operations; 12956 is TIWS/Telxius, 18881 is a CLEC
they bought a few years ago, previously known as GVT.
Could be a cable cut in SAM-1, the submarine fiber system operated by
Telxius (the cable is also known as Emergia).
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:24 PM Jared
Only hat-wearing candidates may apply, otherwise ICANN will have 1 less hat.
Em ter, 31 de jul de 2018 11:56, John Curran escreveu:
> Folks -
> Nominations are still being accepted until 5:00 PM EDT today, Tuesday, 31
> July 2018 for candidates from the ARIN region to fill one seat on
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:29 PM Job Snijders wrote:
> I suspect that this may not be an apples to apples comparison.
> Perhaps lack of IPv6 is more prevalent in rural areas with poorer
> connectivity to the rest of the Internet? Perhaps both these CDNs
> serve content for different types of
If you think the DC itself will be able to help, the contacts for DCs in
IX.br @ Fortaleza are:
Of the listed DCs, Eletronet is the more likely to have STM-1 gear, since
they used STM-n in their fiber ring for a long time.
Globenet connection to IX.br is still under
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:31 PM, McBride, Mack
> PeeringDB is already 100% opt-in.
Domain registration is also opt-in, and still registrars, registries and
ICANN have to change things to comply with GDPR.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Hank Nussbacher
>> Usually, identifying attackers at other online services is a duty on RIR
>> directories, and even the RIPE
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Hank Nussbacher
> On 31/05/2018 21:44, John Peach wrote:
> > On 05/31/2018 02:37 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
> >> On Thu, 31 May 2018, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> >>> FWIW a German court has just ruled against ICANN's injunction and in
> >>> favor of Tucows/EPAG.
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
> >I'm also not foolish enough to think this thread will affect the
> >encrypt-everything crowd as it is more of a religion\ideology than a
> >practical matter. However, maybe it'll shed some light on technical
> >ways of dealing with this
CenturyLink bought Level 3, which bought Global Crossing, which bought
Impsat; this makes every market unique, for the good and bad of it.
What I have as a customer feeling is that Global Crossing was the most
quality-minded of the 4, while the other 3 is/were more "take what we give
you and shut
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Rob McEwen wrote:
> On 4/25/2018 11:39 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote:
>> don't happen if I use private registration
> SUGGESTION: Initially register with private registration - then change it
> to regular non-hidden
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Whois contact details need to work so you can contact the zone owner when
> the DNS is broken for the zone.
> Publishing Whois data in the zone does not work for this purpose.
> This is not to discount other reasons for
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG <
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:27 PM Naslund, Steve
> > They did not in fact have the "right" to publish those pamphlets.
> Now we're way off-topic, but our constitution
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:10 PM, wrote:
> On April 20, 2018 at 12:03 oscar.vi...@gmail.com (Tei) wrote:
> > Maybe a good balance for whois is to include organization information
> > so I know where a website is hosted, but not personal information, so
> > I can't show in
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:51 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Filip Hruska:
> > On 04/14/2018 07:29 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Filip Hruska:
> >>> EURID (.eu) WHOIS already works on a basis that no information about
> >>> registrant is available via standard
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:46 PM, wrote:
> GDPR only has jurisdiction over individuals who are citizens of
> countries which are members of the EU. About 27 countries out of
> almost 200 in this world. And companies which manage that data and are
> also within the EU's
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:24 PM, DaKnOb wrote:
> As far as IP Addresses go (and domains too), currently GDPR recognizes the
> rights of individuals, not companies, which means that a company can be in
> the whois query, since it does not have the right to privacy.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Filip Hruska wrote:
> EURID (.eu) WHOIS already works on a basis that no information about the
> registrant is available via standard WHOIS.
> In order to get any useful information you have to go to
> https://whois.eurid.eu and make a request
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 11:06 AM, Brian Kantor wrote:
> There is concern that the WHOIS database service will be in violation
> of the new European GDPR which takes effect May 25th, and may have
> to shut down.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Marty Strong wrote:
> Do you have one?
Yes, supplied by local broadband provider Vivo. FTTH GPON connection,
router with broadband and IPTV services.
> Do you know what is causing it to fail? i.e. IP on internal interface etc.
D-Link DMG-6661 as well.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 12:26 PM, Marty Strong via NANOG
> So far we know about a few CPEs which answer for 220.127.116.11 themselves:
> - Pace 5268
> - Calix GigaCenter
> - Various Cisco Wifi access points
> If you know of others please
at 3:23 PM, <li...@as23738.net> wrote:
> I found this, if it helps. Reuploaded to imgur, since not sure if
> nanog-list takes attachments.
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018, at 9:51 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> > Hi there.
> > I
I found the available product information on NS2 Reach (Nominum) to not
dive into real product behavior like if it requires every HTTP traffic to
be PBR to the box, or possible deployment scenarios without intercepting
all HTTP traffic.
Anyone can shed a light on its workings, or point
http://rick.eng.br/dnssecstat/ is more on topic of we what discussing,
although the monitor is interesting too.
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Christopher Morrow <
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> .br also has such requirements. OpenSRS reference chart has a good hint of
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> I was wonder if anyone within the group has done this research and might
> be able to save me a bit of time. I am in the process of putting together
> a new Registrar and we would like complete ccTLD coverage. I know for
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> Following up - there are three cable landing stations and 9 submarine
> cable systems connecting Puerto Rico.
> One of the cable landing stations experienced flooding, and shutdown its
> power system affecting some
I'm not aware of a South America NOG list, and South Asia already uses
SANOG... but there is one outages-like list for Brazil called Caiu
(Portuguese for "dropped down") at
https://eng.registro.br/mailman/listinfo/caiu) and there is a NOG list for
Latin America called LACNOG at
Yeap. If you look at http://irr.net/docs/list.html , all of them list FTP
sites where you can get all information in bulk, load into your IRR daemon
and have a fast look-up for all that data.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:49 AM, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG <
Even in that case I believe you should encapsulate between two instances of
your own ASN. Your example follows this but the text says only about the
last one in the path, while having both last and at least one previous is
better since you won't be implying that some other AS has connection to yet
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> Is there any news out of the ICANN meeting that just concluded regarding
> new policy's around WHOIS Privacy & Proxy Services?
The Implementation Review Team is just starting its work, so there won't be
much news for
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Grant Ridder
> Didn't realize Akamai kicked out or disabled customers
> "Security blog Krebs on Security has been
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Filip Hruska wrote:
> If you are going the IaaS route, definitely checkout KnotDNS project.
> According to their benchmarks , it does much better than other DNS
> servers in about every workload.
The problem with KnotDNS/Yadifa/NSD
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:56 PM, David wrote:
> On 2016-07-20 12:52 PM, Jacques Latour wrote:
>> In that case, for Canadians, go to http://performance.cira.ca, it's
>> MLAB-NDT based and checks IPv6 and DNSSEC :-)
>> 100% ad free
> And on the flip side, refuses to
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:13 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Not sure the RPZ hammer has been brought out in force yet. I've seen a
> few recommendations on variou
> Not sure the RPZ hammer has been brought out in force yet. I've seen a few
> recommendations on various mailing lists, but no concerted effort.
> Unfortunately, there is no easy/scalable way to determine who a registrar
> for a given name is,
That is called RDAP, but ICANN currently blocks
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> I'll go ahead and assume I wasn't the last person to get this memo
> Lauren Weinstein's PRIVACY Digest):
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By wrote:
> Wherein akamai explains a detailed study showing ipv6 is "well
> over 10%" faster than ipv4 on mobile, and they reference
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Ricky Beam <jfb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:09:04 -0400, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If your users are seeing captchas, one or a few or them are likely to be
>> infected to the point of generati
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Max Tulyev wrote:
> Hi All,
> I need to stop IPv6 web traffic going from our customers to Google
> without touching all other IPv6 and without blackhole IPv6 Google
> network (this case my customers are complaining on long timeouts).
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Anyone from Southwest Airlines on this list?
> On a recent flight I discovered I couldn't complete payment through PayPal
> because my web browsers properly noticed that the Southwest Airlines SSL
> certificate that the
1. Move the website to DDoS-resistant reverse proxy like Cloudflare or
Incapsula, using its current IP address; won't make much of a difference as
attacker will go back to attacking the last known IP address.
2. Change the site IP address and only update it at the reverse proxy
provider, not at
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net said:
v5 is 2.4, v6 3.3.5
Don't know why a 3.3.5 kernel would have deadlocked; don't think there
are any known issues that would cause that, unless there are Mikrotik
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
It looks to have only affected the CCR line and only those running the NTP
and not the SNTP package.
That's Mikrotik's position, but reports of some users contradict their
version (both in the need for NTP and for only
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Michel Luczak fr...@shrd.fr wrote:
I had problems with Leap Second with mikrotik in versions 6.29.1, 6.28,
6.5 and other versions.
Configured NTP Client in all of them.
Anyone else had this problem?
Apparently 6.27 was the safe version to have (no
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Frank Bulk frnk...@iname.com wrote:
I'd like to update some material on nanog.cluepon.net (not very responsive
to HTTP requests right now) and my account doesn't work anymore. I reached
out to Richard S. but have not heard back from him - anyone else here who
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote:
SLAs are part of a contract, and thus only apply to the parties of the
contract. There are no payments due to other parties. The Internet is a
best effort network, with zero guarantees.
Ok, I'll bite: my
At 08:44 UTC on Friday 12th of June, one of your transit customers,
Telekom Malaysia (AS4788) began announcing the full Internet table back
to you, which you accepted and propagated to your peers and customers,
causing global outages for close to 3 hours.
One thing of notice is that AS
Level 3 wholesale (former Global Crossing), Telefónica Wholesale, Tata
Communications(former Teleglobe) and LANautilus(TI/Sparkle).
Possible local providers could be TelcoNet (private) or CNT
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Eric C. Miller e...@ericheather.com
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Andrew Iwamoto
Is there a tool or method to determine IP blocks assigned to an
organization by ASN? I.e. if I have an organization's ASN number I want to
know all blocks assigned to that ASN.
So, you’re not running into a poorly-documented mystery, you’ve run
afoul of one of the rotten armpits of the shub-Internet.
So there's no consensus between NICs for the information they should
have in whois and what search mechanisms they should provide? I guess
what you're saying is
This is not the response I was looking for (and reading the RFC makes
me feel even worse).
Is there a better mechanism for querying NICs for host/owner information?
There will be, one day. And the start (although not the whole journey) will
be when this I-D follows the standard path all the
It's very likely that your family member has either ETB (local city-owned
access) or Telmex Colombia. Both players have multiple technology options
(ADSL and WiMAX for both, coax and fiber for Telmex Colombia), so besides
replacing one for the other, it might be possible to improve access by
And considering browsers use domains to define whether to send cookies or
not along a request, not having access customers on the same domain of your
website is a security benefit.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Kate Gerry k...@quadranet.com wrote:
Short answer: I just like doing
One could easily presume the ARIN region RPKI deployment statistics are
lower as a result of the RPA situation (and no doubt that it part of the
issue), but as noted earlier, it's unlikely to be the full story since
we also have a region (APNIC) where RPKI deployment also rather low that
Maybe a geo-specific issue then, which is even more weird, because it's
still not working for me from two different ASs, though both in Toronto,
and a traceroute makes it appear like they're not hitting the same nodes
(but maybe they are).
What's even more weird is I can actually resolve
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com
Wondering if some of the long-time list members
can shed some light on the question--why is the
.gov top level domain only for use by US
government agencies? Where do other world
powers put their government agency
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
Alba was the ancient roman name for England, meaning white, because if the
white cliffs of Dover
They called Scotland Caledonia and Ireland Hibernia
Scotland is named for an ancient / mythical queen named
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
On Sep 16, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Available s* include sf, sp, sq, su and sw.
SF (Finland, from “Suomi Finland”) is “transitionally reserved” meaning it
is allocated but will be removed
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Masataka Ohta
What will happen to .uk if England is left alone?
Will be reserved to a future United Korea if that happens...
We are seeing a high profile DNS zone hosted at Akamai with DNSSEC
algorithm mismatch (KSK is algorithm 7, ZSK is algorithm 8).
If someone could contact me off-list...
There would be a root, or multiple roots, which would respond to
requests to locate who should be asked about a domain, for example if
you want to know the ip address for world.std.com the conversation
(To Root Server): Where is the COM server?
(From Root Server):
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Aaron Hopkins li...@die.net wrote:
Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was
surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do:
Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional
cost of $XXX/month. Please
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Mark Andrews wrote:
No, I expect it to be part and parcel of the basic fees, as IPv4
is, which I'm happy to hear it is in this case.
Based on a response I saw in this thread earlier
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know of a reliable public DNS64 service?
Would be cool if Google added a Public DNS64 service, then I could point
the NAT64 prefix at appropriately placed boxes in my network.
Why? Other people are better than me at
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo