No $5 received here.. Just a text message saying, "It's AT&T. We apologize for Thursday's outage, which may have impacted you. As a valued customer, your connection matters and we are committed to doing better.”
I had the thought the other day that maybe this was a hack and that they didn’t want to admit such. I’m sure FirstNet being taken over by hackers isn’t exactly the message they want out there. Regardless of what the actual cause was, their lack of communicating anything meaningful is saying something which boosts the chances that this was a hack in my mind. Agreed on the human error thing, but maybe the human error was something the hackers did that they didn’t mean to. > On Feb 29, 2024, at 2:55 PM, Javier J <jav...@advancedmachines.us> wrote: > > Where did you see this? Erik Prince was on the PBD podcast saying he has a > 70% chance in his head it was China. I tend to learn towards human error from > my experience in the IT biz. > > - J > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:58 AM <j...@joelesler.net > <mailto:j...@joelesler.net>> wrote: >> I read it as “someone pushed an ACL that wasn’t properly reviewed and it >> really screwed things up." >> >>> On Feb 27, 2024, at 21:41, Mark Seiden <m...@seiden.com >>> <mailto:m...@seiden.com>> wrote: >>> >>> aside from the official pablum that was released about an “incorrect >>> process used” >>> (which says exactly nothing) does anyone actually know anything accurate >>> and >>> more specific about the root cause? >>> >>> (and why it took 11 hours to recover?) >>> >>>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 11:15 AM, John Councilman <jcouncil...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:jcouncil...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> From what I've read, they lost their database of SIM cards. I could be >>>> wrong of course. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:02 PM Dorn Hetzel <d...@hetzel.org >>>> <mailto:d...@hetzel.org>> wrote: >>>>> As widespread as it seemed to be, it feels like it would be quite a trick >>>>> if it were a single piece of hardware. Firmware load that ended badly, I >>>>> wonder? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 1:51 PM Leato, Gary via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org >>>>> <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> wrote: >>>>>> Do you have the ability to expand on this at all? Do you mean a hardware >>>>>> failure of some kind IE router, optitcs, etc? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+gleato=advance-trading....@nanog.org >>>>>> <mailto:advance-trading....@nanog.org>> On Behalf Of R. Leigh Hennig >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:17 AM >>>>>> To: Robert DeVita <radev...@mejeticks.com >>>>>> <mailto:radev...@mejeticks.com>> >>>>>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Any info on AT&T Wireless Outage? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Word around the campfire is that it’s a Cisco issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 8:03 AM, Robert DeVita <radev...@mejeticks.com >>>>>> <mailto:radev...@mejeticks.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Reports have it starting at 4:30 a.m.. SOS on all phones.. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Robert DeVita >>>>>> >>>>>> CEO and Founder >>>>>> >>>>>> t: (469) 581-2160 <tel:(469)%20581-2160> >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> m: (469) 441-8864 <tel:(469)%20441-8864> >>>>>> e: radev...@mejeticks.com <mailto:radev...@mejeticks.com> >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> w: mejeticks.com <https://www.mejeticks.com/> >>>>>> a: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2323 N Akard Street >>>>>> >>>>>> , >>>>>> >>>>>> Dallas >>>>>> >>>>>> , >>>>>> >>>>>> 75201 >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/mejeticks/> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mejeticks> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mejeticks> >>>>>> <https://linktr.ee/mejeticks> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The risk of trading futures and options can be substantial. All >>>>>> information, publications, and material used and distributed by Advance >>>>>> Trading Inc. shall be construed as a solicitation. ATI does not maintain >>>>>> an independent research department as defined in CFTC Regulation 1.71. >>>>>> Information obtained from third-party sources is believed to be >>>>>> reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed by Advance Trading Inc. >>>>>> Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. >>> >>
