Anyone from HULU on the list that can contact me regarding a network issue?
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott
Level 3 IP/Routing/Security Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, LLC.
selli...@getunwired.com<mailto:selli...@getunwired.com>
[uw-logo]
www.getunwired.com<http://www.getun
Thanks, Tim! ☺
E-mail sent.
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
Level 3 IP/Routing/Security Network Engineer
[unwired-new-logo]
(559) 476-9463 – Cell
(559) 261- x 129 – Office
(559) 943-1025 – Direct
selli...@getunwired.com<mailto:selli...@getunwired.com>
www.getunwired.co
Hi NANOG,
Is there anyone that has any contact information for someone in Akamai's Abuse
department or if anyone from Akamai is monitoring NANOG that could get in touch
with me off-list, please?
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
selli...@getunwired.com<mailto:se
Anyone from Sling Media on NANOG? If so, can you please contact me off-list? We
have a net block that you guys have incorrect information for which is causing
grief for our mutual customers.
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
selli...@getunwired.com<mailto:selli...@getunwired.com>
issue? I would appreciate it
very much.
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
selli...@getunwired.com<mailto:selli...@getunwired.com>
Can someone from Pandora please contact me off-list? Thanks!
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
selli...@getunwired.com<mailto:selli...@getunwired.com>
environment, I'd love to
learn. I've read some whitepapers on the subject, but most of those deal with
enterprise based networks, and not so much as a service provider.
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
unWired Broadband, Inc.
www.getunwired.com
-Original Message-
From: NANOG
it on a service provider
network.
Kind Regards,
Shon Elliott, KK6TOO
unWired Broadband, Inc.
www.getunwired.com
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Slabbert [mailto:h...@slabnet.com]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:21 PM
To: Shon Elliott <selli...@getunwired.com>
Cc: North American N
My first reply to this thread. I've been kind of tracking it.
I would love to move to IPv6. However, the IPv6 addressing, I have to say, is
really tough to remember and understand for most people. Where is a four number
dotted quad was easy to remember, an IPv6 address.. not so much. I wished
Dean,
I started the thread with the original question, and after not hearing a
suitable response from either Spamcop or someone from the networking side of
Facebook, I gave up on this thread when people like Michelle started chiming in
their opinion. This thread wasn't meant to be an
Hmm... unless I'm completely off, 1,080. About enough for a DS3. Maybe half of a
DS3.. as long as it overreaches their T1 or HDSL capacity. It seems that while
DS3 is a copper product, it's typically delivered to the site broken off of a
fiber node. Wouldn't want to see the installation bill of
The tsunami center has cancelled the warnings for Hawaii (so I just heard from
fox news). I guess it's really nothing, now. Who knows with how many aftershocks
might be generated from that 8.8 EQ.
-S
Jeff Shultz wrote:
On 2/27/2010 3:36 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---
Is anyone else seeing some serious Packet Loss from New York/Washington area
within Level3's network tonight? I'm seeing around 5% packet loss..
-S
So I start trying to figure out why my facebook account keeps saying my e-mail
is invalid, when I know it isn't. I look at my mail server and see it's all
running just fine, and have been receiving mail from others just fine... so I
tail the log and tell Facebook to re-confirm the address...
Feb
.. I'm just saying something
before my customers call me to complain about it... and I know they will.
-S
Reed Loden wrote:
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:14:37 -0800
Shon Elliott s...@unwiredbb.com wrote:
Anyone from Facebook or Spamcop lurking around to look into this? It's quite
annoying.. I
We use Cisco WS-3560G-24-PS-S (Catalyst 3560G's with POE Ports). Provides POE on
each port too to eliminate having to use POE bricks to radios. We actually give
each AP it's own group. It's better to break them all up rather than keep them
in their own broadcast domain, because from subscriber to
Just to chime in on this subject. We're at Equinix in San Jose. For
access to the peering at their facility, they charge a $1000 MRC Fee,
plus another $250 MRC for a cross-connect for GE port. I believe they
also charge a $1000 NRC fee as well. Private peering would be an option
if they didn't
Hey everyone. I didn't really want to ask this out here, but wasn't sure
who else I could ask, but does anyone here have BGP setup with ATT as
well as to other providers? Could you give me a phone number for a rep?
Our ATT reps are telling us they won't allow us to announce IP we get
from ATT and
can't get to cisco.com from here atm either, but can get to facebook. looks like
facebook is now coming from ashburn, va.
cisco dies within level3 for us, and for route-views.oregon-ix.net:
5 eugn-core1-gw.nero.net (207.98.64.161) [AS 3701] !H * !H
don't see that address (198.133.219.25) in
William Pitcock wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 22:37 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
chris rollin wrote:
Shon wrote:
Seth,
I said it could be, not that it is. Thanks for pointing that out. However,
I
believe the reason they are being blocked at ATT is the main reason I
supplied
on my first
, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:38 AM, William Pitcock
neno...@systeminplace.net mailto:neno...@systeminplace.net wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 20:05 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
There has been alot of customers on our network who were
complaining about ACK
scan reports coming from
. There was no other way around
it. I'm sure ATT is probably blocking it for the same reason. 4chan has been
under attack for over 3 weeks, the attacks filling up an entire GigE. If you
want to blame anyone, blame the script kiddies who pull this kind of stunt.
Regards,
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
It seems like my blocking of 207.126.64.181 is pointless, because Level3 is also
blocking the entire net 207.127.64.0.
All I can say is.. oh well. Nothing we can do about it.
jamie wrote:
All,
It appears at ATT (including DSL, and my own home service via u-verse)
has unilaterally and
Jamie,
Unfortunately, that's not easy with wireless backbones. The customers don't have
their own port. I also know for fact that 4chan is in the process of moving,
so what you're seeing could just be that. Them moving.
Regards,
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc
and see most of the entries revolve
around them being down because of DDoS attacks.
Regards,
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc.
Seth Mattinen wrote:
Shon Elliott wrote:
Jamie,
Unfortunately, that's not easy with wireless backbones. The customers
don't have
their own
chris rollin wrote:
Shon wrote:
Seth,
I said it could be, not that it is. Thanks for pointing that out. However,
I
believe the reason they are being blocked at ATT is the main reason I
supplied
on my first post. The DDoS attack issue is the main ticket here.
The ACK storms arent
Does anyone have any data on how the memorial event for Michael Jackson effected
the global backbones? This was seen as another inaugural type of traffic day to
most of the people I've talked to.
-S
That's an excellent question, Freddie. I am also interested in what people are
using for WISP Infrastructure. We also use Motorola PTP, Canopy, as well as
Airstream, Ubiquiti, Trango, and WaveRider.
Regards,
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc.
Freddie Sessler wrote:
Hi
Bruce,
I have that problem using any terminal program (I use SecureCRT).. I have to
bang the command like 10-20 times for the device to recognize it. Kind of wished
CTRL-C or something worked better and actually worked well.
Shon Elliott
Senior Network Engineer
unWired Broadband, Inc.
Bruce
29 matches
Mail list logo
