Use a /30 across the circuit and do multihop BGP using other IPs.
On Friday 10 July 2009 13:48:15 Jay Nakamura wrote:
We are getting an Ethernet DIA circuit from ATT but they insist that
they can't BGP peer with 2 routers on our side. The WAN circuit can
only have /30 they say. Has anyone
but no simpler
without good technical and (hence) business cases.
Stephen Kratzer
Network Engineer
CTI Networks, Inc.
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 06:01:20 Andre Oppermann wrote:
A few time already I've wished for a fully standardized and vendor
interoperable way of doing a true point to point
description, it doesn't sound like you're distributing subnets
across datacenters, and it's difficult to tell how, why, or if you're sharing
provider routes between your routers.
Stephen Kratzer
Network Engineer
CTI Networks, Inc.
On Tuesday 30 June 2009 09:54:29 neal rauhauser wrote:
I have
Should have said And, they have no plans to deploy IPv6 in the immediate
future.
On Thursday 11 June 2009 10:33:25 Stephen Kratzer wrote:
We've only recently started using Cogent transit, but it's been stable
since its introduction 6 months ago. Turn-up was a bit rocky since we never
received
justify them with reputable evidence. I would be extremely
surprised if Cogent engineering isn't working on a IPv6 plan or doesn't
have one already in place.
Bret
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:37 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Stephen Kratzer wrote:
And, they have no plans to support IPv6
, Stephen Kratzer wrote:
Perhaps you missed my quote:
Cogent's official stance on IPv6 is that we will deploy IPv6 when it
becomes a commercial necessity. We have tested IPv6 and we have our plan
for rolling it out, but there are no commercial drivers to spend money
to upgrade a network
On Friday 06 February 2009 08:51:04 Jack Bates wrote:
Joe Loiacono wrote:
Indeed it does. And don't forget that the most basic data object in the
routing table, the address itself, is 4 times as big.
Let's also not forget, that many organizations went from multiple
allocations to a single
protocols and policies
were implemented on what hardware for what kind of user base?
Stephen Kratzer
Network Engineer
CTI Networks, Inc.
On Monday 12 January 2009 01:11:50 Aaron Imbrock wrote:
Stop
in the name of love
Be sure to differentiate between unicast and multicast reachability. Try 'ping
224.0.0.10'.
Stephen Kratzer
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 12:25:34 Philip Lavine wrote:
What is really bizarre is that I am down for minutes not seconds and the
timers never fire. If I don't manually passive
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 13:46:02 Joseph Doran wrote:
EIGRP timers over WAN media default to 60 seconds. Neighborship will not
expire for up to 180 seconds. To verify your EIGRP neighborship do a show
ip eigrp neighbor
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Philip
11 matches
Mail list logo
