On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 4/29/2014 2:06 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
If everyone who had 30+ inaggregable IPv4 prefixes replaced them with 1 (or
even 3) IPv6 prefixes…
As a bonus, we could get rid of NAT, too. ;-)
/me ducks (but you know I had to say
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Will Orton w...@loopfree.net wrote:
Cogent from various west coast USA locations seems to have trouble getting to
some Comcast ipv6 addresses:
Cogent LG Los Angeles to www.comcast6.net
traceroute to 2001:558:fe16:7:69:252:216:215
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Apr 19, 2014, at 1:20 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
There isn't much a firewall can do to break it.
As someone who sees firewalls break the Internet all the time for those whose
packets have the
3 matches
Mail list logo
