A spammer is harvesting email addresses from the NANOG list.

[Tim Pozar]

Looks like a spammer is harvesting email addresses from the NANOG list.  i
I will be unscribing as I don't need this additional noise in my mailbox.

Tim

- Forwarded message from Michele Jemmi  -

Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:06:05 -0500
From: Michele Jemmi 
To: po...@lns.com
Subject: Re: Re: 60 ms cross-continent

   So, where did u leave?

- End forwarded message -
 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Re: Re: 60 ms cross-continent
Date:   Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:59:05 -0500
From:   Michele Jemmi 
Reply-To:   Michele Jemmi 
To: po...@lns.com

hiyaa u made my kitty sad
- End forwarded message -
 Forwarded Message 
Subject:Re: 60 ms cross-continent
Date:   Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:52:05 -0500
From:   Michele Jemmi 
Reply-To:   Michele Jemmi 
To: po...@lns.com

hey Having u so close is what I need the most, =?UTF-8?Q?Tim_Po=C5=BE=C3=A1r?= 
I want to feel yur love completely. Do u want me to go or will u come for me? ..
- End forwarded message -

-- 
 GPG Fingerprint: 4821 CFDA 06E7 49F3 BF05  3F02 11E3 390F 8338 5B04
  https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x11E3390F83385B04
   https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=pozar%40lns.com

Re: Cable/Wireless-Tower Map for the San Francisco Bay Coastside?

[Tim Pozar]

Sizable towers need to be registered with the FAA.  You can go to:

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrAdvancedSearch.jsp

Type in Half Moon Bay and CA for the state for a listing.  Or better yet
the lat lon and radius.

Tim

On 1/13/19 3:29 PM, Yosem Companys wrote:
> Hey All,
> 
> Does anyone know whether there's a map that shows the
> cable/wireless-tower map for the San Francisco Bay Coastside (i.e., from
> Montara to Half Moon Bay)?
> 
> A few days ago, a truck hit a PG post on Highway 92, which traverses
> from San Mateo to Half Moon Bay. The accident caused the post to fall to
> the ground. 
> 
> The Coastside has one Comcast-owned, fiber-optic cable that crosses the
> mountains from Silicon Valley to the Coastside. I guess the cable must
> run on PG posts because not only did the accident cause a blackout in
> some areas of the Coastside but also the entire Coastside was left
> without almost any Cable TV, Internet, or mobile phone connectivity for
> practically 24 hours.
> 
> I only have anecdotal evidence, but it seems that there was no Comcast
> or Verizon service whatsoever because Verizon leases the fiber-optic
> line from Comcast. It also seems that DirecTV and AT were not
> affected, and the theories vary as to why. Perhaps AT uses a
> combination of copper wire and wireless to service the area. DirecTV
> allegedly leases connectivity from AT
> 
> I've also heard that Sprint PCS paid the owner of a building near the El
> Granada post office to use it to relay a mobile signal from there. But
> when I asked on Nextdoor about the incident no one mentioned Sprint. In
> prior discussions, Coastside residents say they avoid Sprint and AT
> due to their spotty service. And I know nothing about T-Mobile.
> 
> The reason I ask is because this is not the first time that Coastside
> residents have been left without mobile service, cable TV, and Internet
> connectivity. In fact, it seems to be a frequent phenomenon, making me
> wonder that if the infrastructure here is so fragile what would happen
> in the case of the "Big One" or, God forbid, a Tsunami or major storm
> surge. 
> 
> I understand that there's a plan for emergency responders to maintain
> Internet and mobile connectivity that includes microwave connectivity,
> but I have yet to obtain the details. So I'm trying to get as much data
> as I can to help local decision-makers figure out how to make the
> Coastside more resilient before the next disaster strikes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yosem

Re: Pinging a Device Every Second

[Tim Pozar]

In one of my client's company, we use LibreNMS.  It is normally used to
get SNMP data but we also have it configured to ping our more "high
touch" cients routers.  In that case we can record performance such as
latency and packet loss.  It will generate graphs that we can pass on to
the client.  It also can be set to alert us if a client's router is not
pingable.

LibreNMS can also integrate Smokeping if you want Smokeping-style graphs
showing standard deviation, etc.

Currently I am running LibreNMS on a VM on a Proxmox cluser with a
couple of cores.  It is probing 385 devices every 5 minutes and keeping
up with that.  In polling, SNMP is the real time and CPU hog where ping
is pretty low impact.

Tim

On 12/15/18 9:37 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> You could configure BFD to send out a SNMP alert when three packets have
> been missed on a 50 ms cycle. Or instantly if the interface charges
> state to down. This way you would know that they are down within 150 ms.
> 
> BFD is the hardware solution. A Linux box that has to ping 1000
> addresses per second will be very taxed and likely unable to do that in
> a stable way. You will have seconds where it fails to do them all
> followed by seconds where it attempts to do them more than once. The
> result is that the statistics gathered is worthless. If you do something
> like this, it is much better to have a less ambitious 1 minute cycle.
> 
> Take a look at Smokeping. If you want a graph to show the quality of the
> line, Smokeping makes some very good graphs for that. 
> 
> Regards 
> Baldur 
> 
> 15. dec. 2018 16.49 skrev "Colton Conor"  >:
> 
> How much compute and network resources does it take for a NMS to:
> 
> 1. ICMP ping a device every second
> 2. Record these results.
> 3. Report an alarm after so many seconds of missed pings. 
> 
> We are looking for a system to in near real-time monitor if an end
> customers router is up or down. SNMP I assume would be too resource
> intensive, so ICMP pings seem like the only logical solution.
> 
> The question is once a second pings too polling on an NMS and a
> consumer grade router? Does it take much network bandwidth and CPU
> resources from both the NMS and CPE side?
> 
> Lets say this is for a 1,000 customer ISP.
> 
> 
> 

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

[Tim Pozar]

For dry pairs, I have used Flowpoint SDSL modems (see attached).  I
picked these up for a sawbuck.

Tim

On 12/12/18 5:00 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Nick Bogle wrote:
>> A quick question for you guys;
>>
>> If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for phones)
>> to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you use? We
>> currently are just extending a T1 line to this site, but 1.5Mbps isn't
>> cutting it anymore. Unfortunately it's a research site on a federally
>> protected wildlife preserve so we can't run any new infrastructure (fiber
>> etc) and it isn't in a geographical place where point to point
>> wireless is
>> practical. We were thinking there is some sort of network extender that
>> uses some form of DSL for higher bandwidth capacity.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
> 
> If this is telco provided dry pair then the distance is probably longer
> than 6 miles as the endpoints are probably tied together through a telco
> CO.
> 
> I have not heard of any equipment which will work over a 6 mile pair any
> faster than you're getting with T1.
> 
> You might consider setting up wireless repeaters to bridge where there
> is no direct LOS. Look at what the hamwan guys have done.
> http://hamwan.org/
> 
> -Dan

Re: Console Servers

[Tim Pozar]

I have been deploying Cyclades TS3000 boxes that I can sometimes find
for about $75 each on eBay.  The down side is the firmware is a bit old
so the SSH daemon doesn't really support current ciphers.  The other
downside is the CLI ia a bit cumbersome.

Tim

On 9/18/18 8:43 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
> Alan
> 
> There are maybe too many options out there. The used Cyclades are the
> lowest cost entry point. An ideal solution might
> be https://freetserv.github.io/ but some assembly required. I have
> Lantronix OOB solutions in my lab. Most modern servers come with some
> SOL options so I will assume this is for networking equipment. The
> modern HTML5 interfaces are great and really do drop all the legacy Java
> requirements.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:38 AM Alan Hannan  > wrote:
> 
> I'd like your input on suggestions for an alternate serial port manager.
> 
> Long ago I used Cisco 2511/2611 and was fairly happy.  A little
> later I used portmaster and was less so.  Recently I've been using
> Opengear and they work fairly well but the price is fairly high.   I
> use the CM7100 and IM7100.
> 
> General specs I'm looking for are:
> 
>  * 8 to 48 or more rs232 serial ports on rj45
>  * nice-to-have software selectable pinouts (cisco v. straight)
>  * gig-e ethernet port (100mbps ok)
>  * 1U form factor
>  * redundant AC power
>  * access physical serial connections via local port #
>  * access physical serial connections via local IP alias (nice to have)
> 
> Can you recommend a serial port server/concentrator that I could use
> in place of opengear for a better value and/or lower cost?
> 
> I'm just ignorant about the current market for serial port
> concentrators and so far web searches have not revealed ideas, so
> your input is appreciated!
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -alan
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> - Andrew "lathama" Latham -

Re: (perhaps off topic, but) Microwave Towers

[Tim Pozar]

Most of these horns are for 6GHz.  I have had friends that have
"appropriated" some of them by adding a waveguide to N adapter and use
them for the 5.8GHz ISM band with some minor aiming.  Kick ass antenna gain.

Tim

On 7/14/18 4:37 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Looks like it!
> 
>  Original message ----
> From: Tim Pozar 
> Date: 7/14/18 11:46 AM (GMT-07:00)
> To: Andy Ringsmuth , North American Network
> Operators' Group 
> Subject: Re: (perhaps off topic, but) Microwave Towers
> 
> Did it follow this route?
> 
> http://long-lines.net/places-routes/maps/MW6003.jpg
> 
> Tim
> 
> On 7/14/18 8:41 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 14, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Brian Kantor  wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I find myself driving down Route 66.  On our way through Arizona, I
> was surprised by what look like a lot of old-style microwave links. 
> They pretty much follow the East-West rail line - where I'd expect
> there's a lot of fiber buried.
>>>
>>> Could they be a legacy of the Southern Pacific Railroad Internal
> Network Telecommunications,
>>> now known under the acronym SPRINT?
>>> - Brian
>>>
>>
>> Not along Route 66 in Arizona. That generally parallels BNSF Railway,
> formerly the Santa Fe down there. Southern Pacific followed Interstate
> 10 much further south.
>>
>>
>> 
>> Andy Ringsmuth
>> a...@newslink.com
>> News Link – Manager Technology, Travel & Facilities
>> 2201 Winthrop Rd., Lincoln, NE 68502-4158
>> (402) 475-6397    (402) 304-0083 cellular
>>

Re: (perhaps off topic, but) Microwave Towers

[Tim Pozar]

Did it follow this route?

http://long-lines.net/places-routes/maps/MW6003.jpg

Tim

On 7/14/18 8:41 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 14, 2018, at 10:19 AM, Brian Kantor  wrote:
>>
 I find myself driving down Route 66.  On our way through Arizona, I was 
 surprised by what look like a lot of old-style microwave links.  They 
 pretty much follow the East-West rail line - where I'd expect there's a 
 lot of fiber buried.
>>
>> Could they be a legacy of the Southern Pacific Railroad Internal Network 
>> Telecommunications,
>> now known under the acronym SPRINT?
>>  - Brian
>>
> 
> Not along Route 66 in Arizona. That generally parallels BNSF Railway, 
> formerly the Santa Fe down there. Southern Pacific followed Interstate 10 
> much further south.
> 
> 
> 
> Andy Ringsmuth
> a...@newslink.com
> News Link – Manager Technology, Travel & Facilities
> 2201 Winthrop Rd., Lincoln, NE 68502-4158
> (402) 475-6397(402) 304-0083 cellular
> 

Re: Remote power cycle recommendations

[Tim Pozar]

I have been picking up Server Technology CW-8H1-C20M boxes on eBay for
about $45 to $65 each...

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Server-Technology-CW-8H1-C20M-Switched-Power-Distribution-PDU-1U-Rackmount/332622720429

You can even get some recent firmware for these.

https://www.servertech.com/support/rack-pdu-firmware-downloads/switched-rack-pdu-firmware-downloads

One thing you will need is a NEMA 5-15P to C19 power cable to fit these
units.  I am sure you can find these cheaper than...

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009Z22DRC

Tim

On 4/27/18 8:46 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> I’m sure many here are familiar with or using/have used devices to remotely 
> power cycle equipment. I’m considering a Dataprobe iBoot-G2 and am curious if 
> you’ve had experience with it, or other recommendations.
> 
> I only need one outlet to be remotely power cycle-able. I have one piece of 
> equipment that is occasionally a little flaky and, well, you know the hassle.
> 
> What do people recommend? There seem to be plenty out there which are more 
> designed to auto-reboot when Internet connectivity is lost, aka remotely 
> reboot the ‘ol cable modem for instance, but that’s not my scenario.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 
> Andy Ringsmuth
> a...@newslink.com
> News Link – Manager Technology, Travel & Facilities
> 2201 Winthrop Rd., Lincoln, NE 68502-4158
> (402) 475-6397(402) 304-0083 cellular
> 

Re: 40G and 100G optics options

[Tim Pozar]

Have you checked out Flexoptix?

https://www.flexoptix.net/en/transceiver/qsfp_

Tim

On 12/18/17 9:01 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Hi
> 
> What options are available for 40G QSFP+ and 100G QSFP28 for 10+ km links?
> 
> I see a lot of switches offered with QSFP+ and QSFP28. But I do not seem
> to find the necessary optics to build the links I want.
> 
> For example, take a look at the options available at Fiberstore:
> 
> https://www.fs.com/c/generic-40g-qsfp-891
> 
> Generic Compatible 40GBASE-LR4 and OTU3 QSFP+ 1310nm 10km LC Transceiver
> for SMF
> $340
> 
> Generic Compatible 40GBASE-ER4 and OTU3 QSFP+ 1310nm 40km LC Transceiver
> for SMF
> $1500
> 
> https://www.fs.com/c/generic-qsfp28-100g-transceivers-2858
> 
> Generic Compatible QSFP28 100GBASE-LR4 1310nm 10km Transceiver
> $1999
> 
> Generic Compatible QSFP28 100GBASE-ER4 1310nm 40km Transceiver
> $7000
> 
> That is it. Four modules and the 40km are prohibitive expensive. The
> situation at other vendors appears to be similar.
> 
> I need stronger modules that can do more than 10 km without being
> extremely expensive. Or DWDM modules in the 1550 nm band so I can use
> external amplifiers. Am I looking in the wrong place? Is this expected
> to be available in the near future?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Baldur

Re: Novice sysadmins

[Tim Pozar]

Should have an honorary list of great sysadmins.  In my years of doing
this sort of work, I found a number of folks that would lend a helping
hand.  To that, I would like to nominate:

Strata Rose Chalup
--
Strata Rose Chalup began as a novice sysadmin in 1983 and has been
leading and managing complex IT projects ever since. She is a co-author
of The Practice of System and Network Administration and has taught at
USENIX Annual Tech and LISA for many years. Strata is always looking at
new technologies and is currently enjoying learning the Arduino
microcontroller platform.
[text from her USENIX conference page]


On 12/5/17 11:23 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> And then, let's not forget the BOFH! (http://www.bofharchive.com), and
> Mordac.
> 
> 
> On 12/5/17 11:40 AM, Sam Oduor wrote:
>> Subject of interest; my 15 years experience I met a blend of senior
>> admins
>> while learning the curves ..
>>
>> 1. Those who denied you knowledge/handover due to insecurity
>>
>> 2. Those who fed you with knowledge but were rude and could make you feel
>> like you undergoing some military training
>>
>> 3. Those who gave you manuals and told you go and read; hardcopy was a
>> common thing - I could deliberately stay back in the office and print a
>> whole library :-)
>>
>> 4. The rare breed that walked you through sysadmins !
>>
>>
>> Right now it seems the tables have turned around; I already feel I have
>> come to the end of the road as sysadmin but on a lighter note - I have
>> been
>> working hard on passing knowledge down and this are the new blend of
>> people
>> I have met.
>>
>> 1. Those willing to learn are very obedient but for some reason not up to
>> the task
>>
>> 2. Those who know everything you try to teach them; are kinda rude and
>> they
>> bring down systems - lab systems
>>
>> 3. Those who commit to be taught but never show up for free lessons
>> despite
>> offering them free lunch :-)
>>
>> 4. A rare young  breed that teaches me mobile apps and new games online -
>> the 90's champs !
>>
>> 5. A rare breed that goes the extra mile; sacrifice time and money to
>> learn
>> !
>>
>>
>> I love 4 & 5 !
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Grant Taylor via NANOG 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/05/2017 09:17 AM, Harald Koch wrote:
>>>
 Thirty years ago I started my sysadmin journey on an Internet that was
 filled with helpful, experienced people that were willing to share
 their
 knowledge.

>>> The vast majority of what I've experienced in the last ~20 years has
>>> been
>>> people willing to help others who are trying to help themselves.
>>>
>>> If you are trying, make an honest mistake, and are willing to correct it
>>> when others politely let you know, you will quite likely find people
>>> willing to help you.  Especially if you return the favor in kind.
>>>
>>> If you are being a hooligan and not responding to problems reported
>>> to you
>>> or purposefully ~> wantonly doing things to others ... good luck.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Grant. . . .
>>> unix || die
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Re: Internet access for security consultants - pen tests, attack traffic, bulk e-mail, etc.

[Tim Pozar]

Ping the DNC? :-)

https://www.wired.com/story/the-dncs-technology-chief-is-phishing-his-staff-good/

Tim

On 9/11/17 3:40 PM, Sean Pedersen wrote:
> We were recently approached by a company that does security consulting. Some
> of the functions they perform include discovery scans, penetration testing,
> bulk e-mail generation (phishing, malware, etc.), hosting fake botnets -
> basically, they'd be generating a lot of bad network traffic. Targeted at
> specific clients/customers, but still bad. As an ISP, this is new territory
> for us and there are some concerns about potential impact, abuse reports,
> reputation, authorization to perform such tests, etc. 
> 
>  
> 
> Does anyone have experience in this area that would be willing to offer
> advice?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 

Re: Creating a Circuit ID Format

[Tim Pozar]

Could start looking at the AT/Telecordia standards for this sort of
thing...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circuit_ID
http://www.centurylink.com/wholesale/systems/WebHelp/reference/circuit_id_formats_guide.htm

On 8/21/17 1:26 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> We are building a new fiber network, and need help creating a circuit ID
> format to for new fiber circuits. Is there a guide or standard for fiber
> circuit formats? Does the circuit ID change when say a customer upgrades
> for 100Mbps to 1Gbps port?
> 
> What do the larger carriers do? Any advice on creating a circuit ID format
> for a brand new fiber network?
> 
> 
>  Originally we ran a CLEC using a LECs copper, and our circuit ID was
> historically a telephone number for DSL circuits. The ILEC had a complex
> method for assigning circuit IDs.
> 
> I am sure anything will work as long as you keep track of it, but any
> advice would be great!
> 

So long as we are talking infrastructure...

[Tim Pozar]

Anyone have experience with Gripple's seismic bracing vs Unistrut's?
Looking at putting something in on the Farallons for a rack there and
Gripple's system looks lighter and possibly easier to install...

http://grippleseismic.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/03/BROC-SEISMIC-US-10_16-web.pdf

You can reply directly back to me as I don't know if the rest of the
list wants to see this thread.

Thanks...
Tim

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

[Tim Pozar]

BTW...  At Fandor (before I left) we got one of the last /24s that ARIN
had.   Our transit providers at the office were Monkey Brains (wireless)
and Zayo (fiber).  We purchased a ER Pro, upgraded the memory and were
peering v4 with both on this box.  MB didn't have V6 at that point.  We
did nail up our V6 announcement with Zayo and got it that way.

If folks need config examples.

Tim

Re: Russian diplomats lingering near fiber optic cables

[Tim Pozar]

I pretended to be a Russian diplomat today.
Tim

 On 6/3/17 12:13 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:40 AM,   wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Well, I'd be willing to buy that logic, except the specific buildings called
>> out look pretty damned big for just drying off a cable.  For example, this
>> is claimed to be the US landing point for TAT-14 - looks around 4K square 
>> feet?
>
> I think you might be off by an order of magnitude or two
> on that.  4,000 sq ft is about the size of the guest bathroom
> in Snowhorn's new house, isn't it?
>
> (well, OK, maybe a slight exaggeration...  ;)
>
> Matt

Re: EFF Call for sign-ons: ISPs, networking companies and engineers opposed to FCC privacy repeal

[Tim Pozar]

Alexa ran into this problem...

https://www.cnet.com/news/amazon-unit-settles-privacy-lawsuit/

Tim

On 3/28/17 11:45 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
> No ISPs have any right to market our customers browsing history, and 
> currently that practice is illegal unless the customer opts in. In my 
> opinion, only a fool wants to relieve ISPs of this restriction.
> 
> The claim oft presented by people favoring this customer abuse is that the 
> sold data is anonymous. But it's been well-established that very simple data 
> aggregation techniques can develop signatures that reveal the identity of 
> people in anonymized data.
> 
>  -mel beckman
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Rod Beck  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Last time I checked most European countries have stronger privacy 
>> protections than the US. Are they also idiots? Mr. Glass, would you care to 
>> respond?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Roderick.
>>
>>
>> 
>> From: NANOG  on behalf of Brett Glass 
>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 1:13 AM
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: EFF Call for sign-ons: ISPs, networking companies and engineers 
>> opposed to FCC privacy repeal
>>
>> All:
>>
>> It's worth noting that most of EFF's list consists of individuals
>> and/or politically connected organizations, not actual ISPs. This
>> is for good reason. EFF was founded with the intention of creating
>> a civil rights organization but has morphed into a captive
>> corporate lobbying shop for Google, to which several of its board
>> members have close financial ties. EFF opposes the interests of
>> hard working ISPs and routinely denigrates them and attempts to
>> foster promotes hatred of them. It also promotes and lobbies for
>> regulations which advantage Google and disadvantage ISPs --
>> including the so-called "broadband privacy" regulations, which
>> heavily burden ISPs while exempting Google from all oversight.
>>
>> No knowledgeable network professional or ISP would support the
>> current FCC rules. Both they AND the FCC's illegal Title II
>> classification of ISPs must be rolled back, restoring the FTC's
>> ability to apply uniform and apolitical privacy standards to all of
>> the players in the Internet ecosystem. The first step is to support
>> S.J. Res 34/H.J. Res 86, the Congressional resolution which would
>> revoke the current FCC regulations that were written and paid for
>> by Google and its lobbyists. So, DO contact  your legislators...
>> but do so in support of the resolutions that will repeal the
>> regulations. It is vital to the future of the Internet.
>>
>> --Brett Glass, Owner and Founder, LARIAT.NET
>>
>> At 05:05 PM 3/26/2017, Peter Eckersley wrote:
>>
>>> Dear network operators,
>>>
>>> I'm sure this is a controversial topic in the NANOG community, but EFF and a
>>> number of ISPs and networking companies are writing to Congress opposing the
>>> repeal of the FCC's broadband privacy rules, which require explicit opt-in
>>> consent before ISPs use or sell sensitive, non-anonymized data (including
>>> non-anonymized locations and browsing histories).
>>>
>>> If you or your employer would like to sign on to such a letter, please reply
>>> off-list by midday Monday with your name, and a one-sentence description of
>>> your affiliation and/or major career accomplishments.
>>

Re: EFF Call for sign-ons: ISPs, networking companies and engineers opposed to FCC privacy repeal

[Tim Pozar]

On 3/27/17 4:22 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I am somehow please that Mr. Glass does not find me a “knowledgeable
> network professional”. It feels like a badge of honor. Any other “not”
> knowledgeable network professionals want to come forward and accept
> this badge?

You will find me as cosignatory to the EFF's letter seen at:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/03/small-isps-oppose-congressess-move-abolish-privacy-protections

Not like I have any experience running an ISP, Datacenter, Content
provider, anti-spam provider, etc...

Tim

Re: NANOG meeting live stream - hope to be back soon

[Tim Pozar]

Do you need Wowza servers? I can prevision some within minutes.

Tim

On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Andrew Koch a...@gawul.net wrote:

 We are aware of the live streaming troubles.  The engineering team is
 working on switching out to the backup the system at this time.
 Hopefully, the stream will be back soon.
 
 Best Regards,
 Andrew Koch
 on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee
 

Re: NANOG meeting live stream - hope to be back soon

[Tim Pozar]

There is a back up audio stream at:

http://stream2.streamq.net:8080/listen.pls

Tim

On Jun 4, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Andrew Koch a...@gawul.net wrote:

 We are aware of the live streaming troubles.  The engineering team is
 working on switching out to the backup the system at this time.
 Hopefully, the stream will be back soon.
 
 Best Regards,
 Andrew Koch
 on behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee