Re: _65000_ in as-path - paging 8544, 16229, 37958

2008-12-11 Thread bill fumerola
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 08:44:28AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote: On 10 Dec 2008, at 16:20, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On Dec 10, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Cvetan Ivanov wrote: 65000 and above are private as numbers and should not be seen in the global table. 64512 above. Indeed, the reference is

Re: 91.207.218.0/23 prefix in DFZ - AS3.21 / AS196629 - announced with AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE in AS4_PATH - propagated by 35320

2008-12-11 Thread bill fumerola
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:28:46PM +0100, bj...@mork.no wrote: No you can't rely on that. But still, RFC4271 doesn't seemt to allow ignoring it. Which must be a bug in the RFC, or my reading of it. Hopefully the latter. Great if someone could correct the interpretation below. IMHO, an

Re: Telecom Collapse?

2008-12-04 Thread bill fumerola
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:10:57PM -0800, Mike Lyon wrote: Anyways, for residential VOIP, where are we these days with E911? Are providers like Vonage and such providing reliable E911 when people call 911? That is one of the major problems I see with the residential realm going with VOIP