On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 04:49:38PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Scott Weeks wrote:
> > It's all phunny money. Real economics are not even considered.
> > At all.
>
> And what makes your think the Data Center Optimization Initiative is any
> different, when they are counting
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 01:27:32PM +, Nicholas Warren wrote:
> http://nabcop.org/index.php
>
> For me the logo is a flower and it says "Set $wgLogo to the URL path to your
> own logo image."
> Am I the only one?
Same here. I suspect that the page has not been fully customized.
--
Mike
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:51:07AM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> > On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> >
> > Passive cooling typically translates to lower performance but also can
> > be more expensive.
>
> $DAYJOB uses an immersion cooling system so it’s higher
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:42:49AM -0400, Dovid Bender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a
> trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the US
> or UK that will show
> 1) jitter
> 2) packet loss
> 3) very far away
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:06:14PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> It's either Mike, Comcast or the NANOG list, so it's probably a safe bet.
Bilingual English/French may indicate a Canadian mailserver.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
This post includes the word Damn.
damn
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 07:59:41AM -0700, James Downs wrote:
On Aug 11, 2015, at 06:01, Rafael Possamai raf...@gav.ufsc.br wrote:
style as nanog and registered the nadcog.org domain.
Nad Cog?
North American Data Center Operations Group, perhaps?
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 01:52:17PM -0700, alvin nanog wrote:
hi ethan
On 08/03/15 at 10:58am, Ethan wrote:
Getting bandwidth into the events is a pain. Huge venues are meant for large
corporate events not lower budget cons and festivals. Venue pricing I
believe is 750-1500$ per
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:50:44PM +0100, Colin Johnston wrote:
blocking to mitigate risk is a better trade off gaining better percentage
legit traffic against a indventant minor valid good network range.
That may be your call, or your management's call, but that doesn't make it
*my* call or
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:27:08PM +0300, John Kinsella wrote:
On 7/15/15 1:28 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
You can't be a dummy and a service provider...
oh? :)
Counterexample: Cox. They refuse to even admit to me that they are even
considering IPV6.
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 05:34:03AM +, Mel Beckman wrote:
Owen,
I never said it was a greenfield deployment. Someone else tagged it with
that term.
My understanding of the term greenfield WRT wifi is that there are no
interfering signals to contend with. I don't know of any U.S. airport
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:30:05PM -0400, A MEKKAOUI wrote:
Your right. Actually, Bell knows that home does not need that much
BW, Bell size their network for much less than that. However, from a
marketing perspective, when Bell says to a client I am offering you
1G at $100 and competition are
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:06:26PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 26, 2015, at 13:02 , Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 13:39 -0500, Rafael Possamai wrote:
How does one fully utilize a gigabit link for home use? For a single person
it is overkill.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:01:38PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote:
Some of those are why would one EVER need more than X, while others are why
would one NOW need more than X. Big difference. Simple fact that there is
no residential application that needs more than even 50 megabit much less
10,000
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:34:46PM +, Cryptographrix wrote:
Have to agree with Shawn on this.
If you watch her testimony in front of Congress, it is clear that she was
completely flustered at the inability to hire competent people, and the
lack of her superiors to prioritize the
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 07:21:12PM +0300, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
Tell me how do you plan find printer in /64 subnet, scan it?
On 02.06.2015 18:08, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
I can't run my laser printer without a firewall in front of it, and I
can't even guess how secure the controller in
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 02:06:18PM -0500, Chris Brookes wrote:
Anyone else seeing a lot of latency to google via qwest?
..
11 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms min-edge-12.inet.qwest.net [207.225.128.1]
1215 ms13 ms12 ms chx-edge-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.38.5]
1312 ms21 ms
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:10:29PM -0400, hass...@hushmail.com wrote:
No one replied with any useful information. I guess no one wants
competition on this list? Pretty poor tactic.
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:55:01 -0400 hass...@hushmail.com wrote:
I want to begin making my own ISP, mainly for
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:21:57AM -0700, Mark Keymer wrote:
I am wondering what some of you guys do when your home ISP is down. At
least those of you that don't give yourself internet.
I myself have a cable provider at home that I use. And I find it quite
frustrating to call and report
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:09:03PM -0400, Eric Wieling wrote:
Obligatory xkcd http://xkcd.com/806/
Damn, that's _fine_!
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:17:07AM -0700, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Mark Keymer m...@viviotech.net wrote:
I am wondering what some of you guys do when your home ISP is down. At
least those of you that don't give yourself internet.
snip
I know we have a wide
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:49:03PM -0430, Greg Ihnen wrote:
What standards? The RFID tag on the milk carton will, essentially, replace
the bar code once RFID tags become cheap enough. It'll be like an
uber-barcode with a bunch more information.
For keeping track of how much, cheap
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:39:59AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 07:33:53PM -0400, Stefan Fouant wrote:
Is there an acronym for RTFM when there are a volume of manuals that need
to be read?
FOAD, perhaps?
Well, there's ADD: Attention Deficit Disorder.
Then there's
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:47:18PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 6/22/2011 14:33, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
I agree, the whole use of the terms 'need' and 'want' in this conversation
are
ridiculous. It's the Internet. The entire thing isn't a 'need'. It's
not like life
support or
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:04:25PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Aw, Jeezus.
No. Just, no.
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/06/17/202245/
Yeah. Maybe ICANN needs its own special TLD: .idiots?
--
Mike Andrews, W5EGO
mi...@mikea.ath.cx
Tired old sysadmin
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:21:35AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:41 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Nice try, but the human right you just made a case for is the right to rid
yourself of criminals and despots.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:34:59AM -1000, Paul Graydon wrote:
On 05/20/2011 08:53 AM, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:46:45PM +, Eu-Ming Lee wrote:
To do this, you only need 2 numbers: the nth digit of pi and the number of
digits.
Simply convert your message into a
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:53:47AM -0500, Chad Dailey wrote:
+1. I'd go to six months, having been the night shift bitch. Flipping
shifts around damn near killed me.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Mark Green ktm200...@hotmail.com wrote:
Suggestion; once on the 'night shift' stay put
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 02:41:18PM +, Mike Walter wrote:
I find it amusing that the article says - The deal will combine two
unprofitable companies
So I guess the thinking is that two negatives make a positive?
They may lose on every subscriber, but now they'll make it up in
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:34:13AM -0400, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:27 58AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
That's a good question. Maybe they can't qualify under Arin rules.
Another question will be: how is Arin going to handle it?
Im pretty sure that the RSA says that
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:08:39AM -0800, JC Dill wrote:
On 22/02/11 10:38 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
The other CERT: Community Emergency Response Team.
https://www.citizencorps.gov/cert/about.shtm
+1 for CERT. I also think that taking a CERT class is a great way to
re-evaluate your own
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:14:04AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
From: Jeff Wheeler
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 8:13 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an
IPv6naysayer...)
I suspect Google, Microsoft, and others have already
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 05:01:12PM -0500, Joly MacFie wrote:
Any confirmation of internet blocking?
http://bikyamasr.com/wordpress/?p=26849
As massive street demonstrations are met with widespread violence in
Algeria, the country is reporting that many Facebook accounts have been
deleted
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
And Maybe even 1 or more people that view this list. Why don't they just
talk to there own staff about the issues? Maybe one of the IT guess saw
the issues talked
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:20:54PM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:53 22PM, mikea wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:26:58PM -0800, Mark Keymer wrote:
What I don't understand is I can only guess they must have a IT team.
And Maybe even 1 or more people that view
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:59:15PM -0600, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/27/2011 6:25 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Anyone for peering cake?
Yeah, Google, HE, Cogent, Sprint, Qwest, and Level3 all need peering
cakes (as I'm pretty sure there is no participant in that list which is
connected
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 04:33:30PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Valdis Kletnieks valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Why the hostility, Valdis?
As I said several times - it's not hard to be 98% or 99% sure you can make
all your commitments. However, since
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:52:56PM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Friday, January 07, 2011 09:25:59 am David Sparro wrote:
I find that the security Layers advocates tend not to look at the
differing value of each of those layers.
Different layers very much have different values, and, yes,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 06:36:25AM -0500, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
TR Shaw ts...@oitc.com writes:
There is a federal directive that has been in place for a number of
years that requires IPV6 support for all new IT contracts/systems
and also a directive to all federal agencies to
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 09:33:46PM -0600, Graham Wooden wrote:
Hi there,
I encountered an interesting issue today and I found it so bizarre ? so I
thought I would share it.
I brought online a spare server to help offload some of the recent VMs that
I have been deploying. Around the same
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 06:41:09PM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Contrary to popular belief the average person tend to severely dislike
all forms of road construction or having their yard repeatedly torn up.
I know it's all happy fun times to say let's have 10 water/electrical
providers and
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:13:21PM -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
You may find that simply fewer content providers decide it's worth it to play
in that space, under those conditions, which results in fewer choices for the
consumer, and something closer to a monopoly on the available content
to
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:51:24PM -0800, Michael J Wise wrote:
On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:39:02PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said:
Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had
someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor?
Oh, times
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:00:56PM -0500, Stefan Fouant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: mikea [mailto:mi...@mikea.ath.cx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:28 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.
Someone is confusing
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:59:07AM -0800, andrew.wallace wrote:
I was reading about this- yeah really anonymous.
http://praetorianprefect.com/archives/2010/12/anonymous-releases-very-unanonymous-press-release/
Also:
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/11/anonymous-isnt-loic.html
All we
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:26:30PM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
front lines of this cyberwar?
Warfare isn't the correct metaphor.
Espionage/covert action is the correct metaphor.
Low intensity conflict may be more correct.
--
Mike
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 06:29:54PM -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Old skool.
Twitter is much faster:
http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/home/government-disaster-advisors-twitter-ha
cked-used-to-send-tsunami-warning/408447
But morse code is still
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 10:49:47AM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:45 AM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
We do remember, don't we, that the domain that started this discussion
were shut down by Verisign, the registry, not a registrar?
interesting that in
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:17:37PM -1000, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ricky Beam wrote:
I think they are now a violation of the NEC. And they were delisted by UL
years ago. They pose a hazard as they will not react fast enough to
prevent a fatal shock. (and the only one's
49 matches
Mail list logo