t: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:47
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: Looking for Yahoo eMail contact
Today the situation cleared on it’s own as it appears. (at least I haven’t been
notified of any human action)
Thanks to all those replying on and off list.
Regards,
Marc
ards, Marc
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:47
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: Looking for Yahoo eMail contact
Today the situation cleared on it’s own as it appears. (at least I haven’t been
notified of any human action)
Thanks to all thos
Wait I thought that was NTF, (No Trouble Found), as it magically cleared
up. Amazing what was/is done to avoid reporting issues/problems to the PUC
or the like.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 1/12/2016 03:47, Marc Storck wrote:
>
>> Today the
On 1/12/16, 7:04 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Larry Sheldon"
wrote:
>I told her it meant "All Fouled Up", where upon she picked up another
>stack, also mine, marked "NFG".
At $DAYJOB we often ship audio/video equipment via air counter to
Yes this one intrigued me as well, especially as one of the suggestions
provided:
https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/review-practices-senders-sln3435.html
Which states:
If your messages are being blocked, look closely at any SMTP error codes our
mail servers are returning and make sure
Today the situation cleared on it’s own as it appears. (at least I haven’t been
notified of any human action)
Thanks to all those replying on and off list.
Regards,
Marc
> On 11 Jan 2016, at 13:25, Marc Storck wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m looking for a Yahoo email
On 1/12/2016 03:47, Marc Storck wrote:
Today the situation cleared on it’s own as it appears. (at least I
haven’t been notified of any human action)
Ancient wire-line telephone and telegraph (aka "data" in the latter
days) technology, trouble ticket code "CCWT" ("Came Clear While Testing").
On 1/12/2016 15:15, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Wait I thought that was NTF, (No Trouble Found), as it magically cleared
up. Amazing what was/is done to avoid reporting issues/problems to the
PUC or the like.
"NTF" is valid only if the reported condition was not observed by the
reporter at all.
On 1/12/2016 19:04, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 1/12/2016 15:15, Jonathan Smith wrote:
Wait I thought that was NTF, (No Trouble Found), as it magically cleared
up. Amazing what was/is done to avoid reporting issues/problems to the
PUC or the like.
"NTF" is valid only if the reported condition
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:25:17 +, Marc Storck said:
> I'm looking for a Yahoo email administrator who could contact me offlist.
> Error: "421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from x.x.x.x permanently deferred"
If you find one, tell them to go look up the difference between 4xx and 5xx
return codes.
Hello,
I’m looking for a Yahoo email administrator who could contact me offlist.
I have a customer with a clean record that is getting thsi error:
Error: "421 4.7.1 [TS03] All messages from x.x.x.x permanently deferred" when
sending email to Yahoo
The customer is a local non-profit and sends
http://postmaster.yahoo.com, click on "Contact Us" at the top since your
question isn't one of the giant ones in the middle of the page.
Elizabeth Zwicky
On Monday, January 11, 2016 4:28 AM, Marc Storck
wrote:
Hello,
I’m looking for a Yahoo email administrator
Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG writes:
> "permanently deferred"
Does not compute :)
Bjørn
13 matches
Mail list logo