Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 09:51:36AM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: > Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are > adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some > fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We > found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU > switches) are sagging quite bad. A perpetual problem with Cisco all the way back to their 2501 routers. Sometimes they seem to come out with a better design, only to revert back to the worst design the next generation of gear. > Is there a 'standard' distance between front and back rails > that devices usually adhere to? I've got about 5 different "standard" depths in my datacenter. The most common I have is 29.5" because that is the depth of a whole bunch of fixed (ie. not adjustable) shelves I have are. I've seen 32" and 36" in use for newer setups, as the eqiupment keeps getting deeper, and deeper. Most equipment today will adjust for different depths quite readily, and stick out past the back rails (so those 1050mm or 1200mm deep cabinets really don't give you lots of empty space when the gear inside requires all that depth, then power cables take up the rest). So, ultimately the depth doesn't matter much as the rails will adjust to what you have within reason now-a-days. Gone are the days where equipment (ie. Sun, DEC) only fit in that one rack that Sun paired with that specific Sun line. And when you bought different Sun gear, you needed to buy a different rack to hold that.
RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 2:38 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: > Fascinating. I’ve never had an ASR-1001 come with two sets of ears, and I > also note that the text of the instruction manual doesn’t reference the > rear set at all. I’ve never seen rear ears on any Cisco gear of my own, > nor on anything the local ILEC has installed either. I think the diagram > is in error here. > > However, the “optional” step 1 is a pretty solid hint (i.e. pretty much a > clue-by-four upside the head, here!) that you really should use a shelf. > As in you REALLY SHOULD USE A SHELF of some kind. > Hah! Your mention of clue-by-fours while we are talking about drooping routers reminds me of one of my more useful tools. I have a bunch of bits of 2x4 which I've cut to around 1.75", 3.5", 7". These are really really helpful when trying to mount a piece of equipment under something which is either not screwed in, or is drooping at the back. You can use these as spacers when replacing a bit of gear which is supporting other bits of gear, or, with a small shim/flat screwdriver as a way to jack up a devices which is drooping at the back (and so slide in another device). There are much more elegant solutions (like a machinist jack), but a few off-cuts of 2x4 are cheap, light, and non-marring. This thread feels somewhat like "old NANOG" - people discussing actual issues that they run into, and then sharing tips and tricks to help with those issues. I miss this… W > > It doesn’t even have to be a full shelf – any rail kit that relies on an > “L”-shaped profile instead of interlocking sliding bits should support an > ASR-1001 just fine, e.g. Tripp-Lite’s 4POSTRAILKIT1U. RackSolutions’ > Universal > Fixed Server Rack Rails <https://www.rack-solutions.ca/rack-rails.html> > shows an example of a slightly different design that some prefer – it all > works about the same way. > > > > The other thing I’ve done is used a shallow cantilever shelf to support > the rear end of equipment that only comes with ears, if it’s deep enough – > something like StarTech’s CABSHELFV1U; the trick is finding a shelf that > simultaneously doesn’t have the structural fold at the rear in the way AND > doesn’t interfere with the device immediately below. You’d think there’re > only 2 geometries of product to worry about, but there are actually more > b/c there’s no standard – so test-fit first, or examine photos really > carefully. This is usually more of a hack than a permanent, supportable > solution, but sometimes it can work very well and very cheaply. > > > > Or, just make sure you’re installing the ASR immediately above something > that does have proper 4-post mounting rails. This is probably the single > most common way to safely & securely mount “eared” devices in a 4-post rack > that I’ve seen – that Dell PowerEdge server in the rack suddenly starts > doing double-duty as a shelf! (Or the UPS, or the KVM, or the ethernet > switch, or…) > > > > -Adam > > > > *Adam Thompson* > > Consultant, Infrastructure Services > > > > 100 - 135 Innovation Drive > > Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 > > (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) > > https://www.merlin.mb.ca > > Chat with me on Teams > <https://teams.microsoft.com/l/chat/0/0?users=athomp...@merlin.mb.ca> > > > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf > Of *Chuck Church > *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2023 10:36 AM > *To:* 'Mark Stevens' ; nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question > > > > Hey all, sorry I did mean to say ASR1001 (an X model to be exact). The 4 > post mounting they show in a hardware mounting doc uses front and back > ears, which I’ve never done: > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr1000/install/guide/ > asr1routers/asr-1000-series-hig/asr-hig-1001.html#task_1205646 > see figure 16 slightly down from there. > > I do see some generic rails from TrippLite that probably would work, as > well as shelves. I was hoping a standard depth that most vendors honored > for 4 post existed, but it doesn’t seem likely. We’ll have a variety of > PaloAlto, Cisco, Checkpoint, and others co-habiting. > > > > Chuck > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf > Of *Mark Stevens > *Sent:* Thursday, April 27, 2023 11:17 AM > *To:* nanog@nanog.org > *Subject:* Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question > > > > Lucky you with a 19" data rack. All I have are 23" telco racks but I will > say, the 23" extension ears from Cisco are serious and my router chassis' > don't sag. > > Mark > > On 4/27/2023 10:04 AM, Chris Marget wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM C
RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
Fascinating. I’ve never had an ASR-1001 come with two sets of ears, and I also note that the text of the instruction manual doesn’t reference the rear set at all. I’ve never seen rear ears on any Cisco gear of my own, nor on anything the local ILEC has installed either. I think the diagram is in error here. However, the “optional” step 1 is a pretty solid hint (i.e. pretty much a clue-by-four upside the head, here!) that you really should use a shelf. As in you REALLY SHOULD USE A SHELF of some kind. It doesn’t even have to be a full shelf – any rail kit that relies on an “L”-shaped profile instead of interlocking sliding bits should support an ASR-1001 just fine, e.g. Tripp-Lite’s 4POSTRAILKIT1U. RackSolutions’ Universal Fixed Server Rack Rails<https://www.rack-solutions.ca/rack-rails.html> shows an example of a slightly different design that some prefer – it all works about the same way. The other thing I’ve done is used a shallow cantilever shelf to support the rear end of equipment that only comes with ears, if it’s deep enough – something like StarTech’s CABSHELFV1U; the trick is finding a shelf that simultaneously doesn’t have the structural fold at the rear in the way AND doesn’t interfere with the device immediately below. You’d think there’re only 2 geometries of product to worry about, but there are actually more b/c there’s no standard – so test-fit first, or examine photos really carefully. This is usually more of a hack than a permanent, supportable solution, but sometimes it can work very well and very cheaply. Or, just make sure you’re installing the ASR immediately above something that does have proper 4-post mounting rails. This is probably the single most common way to safely & securely mount “eared” devices in a 4-post rack that I’ve seen – that Dell PowerEdge server in the rack suddenly starts doing double-duty as a shelf! (Or the UPS, or the KVM, or the ethernet switch, or…) -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services [cid:image002.png@01D9790D.8F568C90] 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) https://www.merlin.mb.ca<https://www.merlin.mb.ca/> [cid:image003.png@01D9790B.395F2C40]Chat with me on Teams<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/chat/0/0?users=athomp...@merlin.mb.ca> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Chuck Church Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 10:36 AM To: 'Mark Stevens' ; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question Hey all, sorry I did mean to say ASR1001 (an X model to be exact). The 4 post mounting they show in a hardware mounting doc uses front and back ears, which I’ve never done: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr1000/install/guide/asr1routers/asr-1000-series-hig/asr-hig-1001.html#task_1205646 see figure 16 slightly down from there. I do see some generic rails from TrippLite that probably would work, as well as shelves. I was hoping a standard depth that most vendors honored for 4 post existed, but it doesn’t seem likely. We’ll have a variety of PaloAlto, Cisco, Checkpoint, and others co-habiting. Chuck From: NANOG mailto:nanog-bounces+chuckchurch=gmail@nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Mark Stevens Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 11:17 AM To: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question Lucky you with a 19" data rack. All I have are 23" telco racks but I will say, the 23" extension ears from Cisco are serious and my router chassis' don't sag. Mark On 4/27/2023 10:04 AM, Chris Marget wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com>> wrote: for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and back ‘ears’ you use to hit both front and back posts. Front *and* back ears? I'm not sure what an ASA 1001 is (ASR?) but my experience with these boxes is that they have a single pair of ears which can be mounted front OR back. The heavier / deeper 1RU devices do tend to sag alarmingly. Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? If you're thinking of setting the front/back distance to accommodate a specific device, table 2 might be of some interest: https://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/Documents/rail-rack-matrix.pdf
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
> It's super annoying, and somewhat terrifying to be banging on a rack > containing a bunch of spinning rust, but all too often it's necessary we just moved a rack's content from the westin to komo plaza [0] and only had one questionable drive. terrifying is the right word. randy [0] - we may be the first rat off the sad westin ship
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 2:21 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > "small mounting shelf" > > we use mounting shelves for all sorts of recalcitrant devices > Yah, and for recalcitrant screws [0] , one of these: https://amzn.to/41Z0YQq . It's super annoying, and somewhat terrifying to be banging on a rack containing a bunch of spinning rust, but all too often it's necessary… W [0]: You know, the ones that someone decided to put in with an electric drill with the clutch set to "drill", or the ones where someone put a 10/32 screw into an M6 hole, or… > randy >
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
> "small mounting shelf" we use mounting shelves for all sorts of recalcitrant devices randy
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
A bunch of devices (eg Juniper MX240) come with a "small mounting shelf" — see Figure1, Figure 2 at https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/hardware/mx240/topics/topic-map/mx240-installing-the-router.html#id-installing-the-mx240-router-mounting-hardware-for-a-rack-or-cabinet Their theory is that these get mounted on the "back" of the front rail, and it supports the weight of the chassis. I generally just put these on the font of the rear rail, and rest the back of the router on that. Seems to work well - the chassis is narrow enough to slide if the cabinet is very shallow, and the shelf is usually wide enough to deal with deeper cabinets... The other option is "Universal Rails" (AKA "those funny sort of L bracket half shelf thingies") — e.g: https://www.cablesandkits.com/racks-cabinets/rack-mount-shelves-and-rails/rackmount-rails/ck-rckmntrls/pro-18146 W On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:03 AM, Mel Beckman wrote: > We use shelves rather than hanging all the weight of racked gear on the > ears. That rarely works well, but a 4-post shelf for every half-dozen or so > devices works wonderfully. These shelves are usually quite adjustable. > > -mel beckman > > On Apr 27, 2023, at 6:54 AM, Chuck Church wrote: > > > > Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are > adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some > fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. > We found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU > switches) are sagging quite bad. We’re used to the new server type rails > that extend to support most reasonable distances front rails to back for 4 > post mounting. However, for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but > rather front and back ‘ears’ you use to hit both front and back posts. > These would appear to not have any adjustability, the front to back post > distance would seem to need to match the ears, I assume they don’t adjust > placement on the router much. Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front > and back rails that devices usually adhere to? Googling didn’t find an > answer readily. These are 19” wide cabinets by the way. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chuck > >
RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
Hey all, sorry I did mean to say ASR1001 (an X model to be exact). The 4 post mounting they show in a hardware mounting doc uses front and back ears, which I’ve never done: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr1000/install/guide/asr1routers/asr-1000-series-hig/asr-hig-1001.html#task_1205646 see figure 16 slightly down from there. I do see some generic rails from TrippLite that probably would work, as well as shelves. I was hoping a standard depth that most vendors honored for 4 post existed, but it doesn’t seem likely. We’ll have a variety of PaloAlto, Cisco, Checkpoint, and others co-habiting. Chuck From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Stevens Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 11:17 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question Lucky you with a 19" data rack. All I have are 23" telco racks but I will say, the 23" extension ears from Cisco are serious and my router chassis' don't sag. Mark On 4/27/2023 10:04 AM, Chris Marget wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com> > wrote: for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and back ‘ears’ you use to hit both front and back posts. Front *and* back ears? I'm not sure what an ASA 1001 is (ASR?) but my experience with these boxes is that they have a single pair of ears which can be mounted front OR back. The heavier / deeper 1RU devices do tend to sag alarmingly. Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? If you're thinking of setting the front/back distance to accommodate a specific device, table 2 might be of some interest: https://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/Documents/rail-rack-matrix.pdf
RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
We have used these with great luck. Might be able to find some 1U rails instead of the standard 2U. https://www.amazon.com/APC-SU032A-4-Post-Rackmount-Rails/dp/B7L3MX Thanks Travis From: NANOG On Behalf Of Chuck Church Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 8:52 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU switches) are sagging quite bad. We're used to the new server type rails that extend to support most reasonable distances front rails to back for 4 post mounting. However, for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren't rails, but rather front and back 'ears' you use to hit both front and back posts. These would appear to not have any adjustability, the front to back post distance would seem to need to match the ears, I assume they don't adjust placement on the router much. Is there a 'standard' distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? Googling didn't find an answer readily. These are 19" wide cabinets by the way. Thanks, Chuck
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
Lucky you with a 19" data rack. All I have are 23" telco racks but I will say, the 23" extension ears from Cisco are serious and my router chassis' don't sag. Mark On 4/27/2023 10:04 AM, Chris Marget wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church wrote: for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and back ‘ears’ you use to hit both front and back posts. Front *and* back ears? I'm not sure what an ASA 1001 is (ASR?) but my experience with these boxes is that they have a single pair of ears which can be mounted front OR back. The heavier / deeper 1RU devices do tend to sag alarmingly. Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? If you're thinking of setting the front/back distance to accommodate a specific device, table 2 might be of some interest: https://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/Documents/rail-rack-matrix.pdf
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
On 2023-04-27 16:05, Dobbins, Roland via NANOG wrote: > There isn’t a standard for rack depth, AFAIK, but one typically sees > anywhere from 27in/69cm – 50in/127cm, in my experience. 42in/106.7cm > & 48in/122cm are quite common depth dimensions. You are talking about the depth of the entire *cabinet*, right? I.e, how much floor space it occupies. Because the OP asked about the distance between the front and rear mounting *posts*, not the full cabinet depth. (127 cm between the posts would require the cabinet to be 150-160 cm deep at least, and I have never seen racks that deep. Last time I checked, the deepest racks from e.g. Rittal were 120 cm.) /Bellman signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
On 27 Apr 2023, at 20:51, Chuck Church mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com>> wrote: Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? There isn’t a standard for rack depth, AFAIK, but one typically sees anywhere from 27in/69cm – 50in/127cm, in my experience. 42in/106.7cm & 48in/122cm are quite common depth dimensions. Others here may have more specific information.
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church wrote: > for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and back ‘ears’ > you use to hit both front and back posts. > Front *and* back ears? I'm not sure what an ASA 1001 is (ASR?) but my experience with these boxes is that they have a single pair of ears which can be mounted front OR back. The heavier / deeper 1RU devices do tend to sag alarmingly. > Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices > usually adhere to? > If you're thinking of setting the front/back distance to accommodate a specific device, table 2 might be of some interest: https://i.dell.com/sites/doccontent/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/Documents/rail-rack-matrix.pdf
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
We use shelves rather than hanging all the weight of racked gear on the ears. That rarely works well, but a 4-post shelf for every half-dozen or so devices works wonderfully. These shelves are usually quite adjustable. -mel beckman On Apr 27, 2023, at 6:54 AM, Chuck Church wrote: Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU switches) are sagging quite bad. We’re used to the new server type rails that extend to support most reasonable distances front rails to back for 4 post mounting. However, for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and back ‘ears’ you use to hit both front and back posts. These would appear to not have any adjustability, the front to back post distance would seem to need to match the ears, I assume they don’t adjust placement on the router much. Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? Googling didn’t find an answer readily. These are 19” wide cabinets by the way. Thanks, Chuck
Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
I have not seen a standard on cabinets. I have gear in a wide variety of racks. Some of are real shallow. Some are deep. I use these to generically solve the sagging issue. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00XXDJASY?ref=nb_sb_ss_w_as-reorder-t1_k1_1_11==EFCM0EZP8BMA==navpoint+ra NavePoint Universal 1U Rack Mount 4-Post Shelf Rail for Dell Compaq IBM HP APC - 33.5 Inches deep amazon.com Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net — https://j2sw.com (AS399332) https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog > On Apr 27, 2023, at 9:51 AM, Chuck Church wrote: > > Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are > adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some > fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We > found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU > switches) are sagging quite bad. We’re used to the new server type rails > that extend to support most reasonable distances front rails to back for 4 > post mounting. However, for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather > front and back ‘ears’ you use to hit both front and back posts. These would > appear to not have any adjustability, the front to back post distance would > seem to need to match the ears, I assume they don’t adjust placement on the > router much. Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails > that devices usually adhere to? Googling didn’t find an answer readily. > These are 19” wide cabinets by the way. > > Thanks, > > Chuck
Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question
Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU switches) are sagging quite bad. We're used to the new server type rails that extend to support most reasonable distances front rails to back for 4 post mounting. However, for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren't rails, but rather front and back 'ears' you use to hit both front and back posts. These would appear to not have any adjustability, the front to back post distance would seem to need to match the ears, I assume they don't adjust placement on the router much. Is there a 'standard' distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? Googling didn't find an answer readily. These are 19" wide cabinets by the way. Thanks, Chuck
