Re: mailops https breakage

2017-06-21 Thread John Levine
In article you write: >> Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so. > >90 days Well, yes. That's why highly skilled and experienced administrators such as yourself set up the automatic renewal scripts at the same time they install the initial

Re: mailops https breakage

2017-06-21 Thread Edwin Pers
Both. Either. Take your pick Ed Pers From: Seth Mattinen Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 8:06 PM Subject: Re: mailops https breakage To: nanog@nanog.org On 6/20/17 16:57, Keith Medcalf wrote: > How else would one maintain government control over free encryption certificates? So Let's Encrypt is

Re: mailops https breakage

2017-06-20 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 6/20/17 16:57, Keith Medcalf wrote: How else would one maintain government control over free encryption certificates? So Let's Encrypt is run by the Illuminati now? Or is it Freemasons? It's hard to keep track.

Re: mailops https breakage

2017-06-20 Thread Randy Bush
> How else would one maintain government control over free encryption > certificates? black helicopters

RE: mailops https breakage

2017-06-20 Thread Keith Medcalf
in Pers > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: mailops https breakage > > > Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so. > > 90 days

Re: mailops https breakage

2017-06-20 Thread Randy Bush
> Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so. 90 days

RE: mailops https breakage

2017-06-19 Thread Edwin Pers
about Ed Pers -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lyndon Nerenberg Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 6:27 PM To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: mailops https breakage > On Aug 27, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Matt Palmer <mpal...@hezmat

mailops https breakage

2017-06-11 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> On Aug 27, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Matt Palmer wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 01:25:42AM -, John Levine wrote: >> In article >> you >> write: >>> I was working within the limits of what I had