Re: mailops https breakage

[John Levine]

In article  you write:
>> Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so.
>
>90 days

Well, yes.  That's why highly skilled and experienced administrators
such as yourself set up the automatic renewal scripts at the same time
they install the initial cert, right?

I use the acme.sh shell script.  It ain't hard.

R's,
John

Re: mailops https breakage

[Edwin Pers]

Both. Either. Take your pick

Ed Pers



From: Seth Mattinen
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: mailops https breakage
To: nanog@nanog.org


On 6/20/17 16:57, Keith Medcalf wrote: > How else would one maintain government 
control over free encryption certificates? So Let's Encrypt is run by the 
Illuminati now? Or is it Freemasons? It's hard to keep track.

Re: mailops https breakage

[Seth Mattinen]

On 6/20/17 16:57, Keith Medcalf wrote:

How else would one maintain government control over free encryption 
certificates?


So Let's Encrypt is run by the Illuminati now? Or is it Freemasons? It's 
hard to keep track.

Re: mailops https breakage

[Randy Bush]

> How else would one maintain government control over free encryption
> certificates?

black helicopters

RE: mailops https breakage

[Keith Medcalf]

How else would one maintain government control over free encryption 
certificates?

--
˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 June, 2017 17:34
> To: Edwin Pers
> Cc: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: mailops https breakage
>
> > Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so.
>
> 90 days

Re: mailops https breakage

[Randy Bush]

> Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so.

90 days

RE: mailops https breakage

[Edwin Pers]

Fun fact about letsencrypt certs, they expire after a month or so. 
Looks like the site admin never noticed/cared to update it (since 2016), even 
though there's a nice little helper program to auto-update them that you can 
throw in a cronjob (or scheduled task, if you're into IIS) and forget about

Ed Pers

-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Lyndon Nerenberg
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 6:27 PM
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: mailops https breakage


> On Aug 27, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Matt Palmer <mpal...@hezmatt.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 01:25:42AM -, John Levine wrote:
>> In article 
>> <caltoqtqkfeadxnr1+4yzydoyuwebg_+qyaq7ubhxtmv0jcn...@mail.gmail.com> you 
>> write:
>>> I was working within the limits of what I had available.
>> 
>> Here's the subscription page for mailop.  It's got about as odd a mix 
>> of people as nanog, ranging from people with single user linux 
>> machines to people who run some of the largest mail systems in the 
>> world, including Gmail:
>> 
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> 
> I know they're mailops, and not tlsops, but surely presenting a cert 
> that didn't expire six months ago isn't beyond the site admin's capabilities?

I tried again, ten months later. Still broken :-(

Is there a replacement site I'm missing out on?

mailops https breakage

[Lyndon Nerenberg]

> On Aug 27, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Matt Palmer  wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 01:25:42AM -, John Levine wrote:
>> In article 
>>  you 
>> write:
>>> I was working within the limits of what I had available.
>> 
>> Here's the subscription page for mailop.  It's got about as odd
>> a mix of people as nanog, ranging from people with single user linux
>> machines to people who run some of the largest mail systems in
>> the world, including Gmail:
>> 
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> 
> I know they're mailops, and not tlsops, but surely presenting a cert that
> didn't expire six months ago isn't beyond the site admin's capabilities?

I tried again, ten months later. Still broken :-(

Is there a replacement site I'm missing out on?