-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the
*.ip6-servers.arpa
nor the *.in-addr-servers.arpa allow axfr. Which leads to the following
questions:
1. Was that a conscious decision, and if so why?
Speaking for the
On 2011-02-16, at 21:15, David Conrad wrote:
Congrats to all on getting this done! It's been a long time in coming. Good
to see it finally finished.
You're very welcome :-) however, the work is not quiet yet done. Next steps are:
week of 2011-02-21: IN-ADDR.ARPA zone dropped from B, C,
On Feb 17, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
At the end of this process every subdomain of ARPA will be fully
DNSSEC-signed.
Cool.
Query rates on the new servers (those operated by the RIRs and ICANN) are
currently low, but are expected to increase as the IN-ADDR.ARPA zone is
dropped
Hi,
It'll be interesting to see what the corresponding drop in traffic in the
root servers will be...
We expect it to be around 2000qps (or ~8% of the total traffic) for
k.root-servers.net. PTR query rates are very steady and do not follow the
general diurnal cycle.
Regards,
Wolfgang
On 02/17/2011 07:11, Wolfgang Nagele wrote:
Hi,
Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the *.ip6-servers.arpa
nor the *.in-addr-servers.arpa allow axfr. Which leads to the following
questions:
1. Was that a conscious decision, and if so why?
Speaking for the operator of
this relevant to the NANOG operator
community.
FYI,
/John
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARINi...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Date: February 16, 2011 3:53:38 PM EST
To:arin-annou...@arin.netmailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
Today ARIN
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
John,
Congratulations to you and ICANN for this significant step, at all the
various layers and meanings of significant. :)
Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the
*.ip6-servers.arpa nor the *.in-addr-servers.arpa
On 02/16/2011 13:44, John Curran wrote:
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
John,
Congratulations to you and ICANN for this significant step, at all the various
layers and meanings of significant. :)
Relevant to another post today, I've noticed that neither the
On 2011-02-16, at 17:33, Doug Barton wrote:
This leads to 2 additional questions:
1. Is the zone available from those 2 locations the same as what's
available on the authoritative servers, or is there a lag time between
updates on the auth and the xfr servers?
The two servers mentioned
- Original Message -
From: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca
To: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Cc: John Curran jcur...@arin.net, NANOG na...@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 12:05:16 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
On 2011-02-16, at 17:33
On 02/16/2011 15:13, Franck Martin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joe Ableyjab...@hopcount.ca
To: Doug Bartondo...@dougbarton.us
Cc: John Curranjcur...@arin.net, NANOGna...@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 12:05:16 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone
message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Date: February 16, 2011 3:53:38 PM EST
To: arin-annou...@arin.netmailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
Today ARIN and ICANN are jointly working on the transition of the technical
12 matches
Mail list logo
