On May 16, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
You want to stream a movie? No problem;
the video player opens up a second data
port back to a server next to the streaming
box; its only purpose is to accept a socket,
and send all bits received on it to /dev/null.
Ah! So somebody nudged me and pointed out that this is a reference to a
satirical story and a standard part of the American curriculum.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:11 AM, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
You shouldn't of stopped them I was eagerly waiting to find out how rtt
was going to be
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com
You want to stream a movie? No problem;
the video player opens up a second data
port back to a server next to the streaming
box; its only purpose is to accept a socket,
and send all bits received on it to /dev/null.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:26:02PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
You want to stream a movie? No problem;
the video player opens up a second data
port back to a server next to the streaming
box; its only purpose is to accept a socket,
and send all bits received on it to /dev/null.
You can
I agree symmetry alone is a bad metric and efforts to build a service, or
artifically game traffic in order to create symmetry will likely have
negative consequences all around.
I can¹t speak for all situations, but I believe relative ³balance was
designed to be one of several criteria which
On May 16, 2014, at 9:28 AM, McElearney, Kevin
kevin_mcelear...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
will likely have
negative consequences all around.
Actually, pretty focusedly more negative for the middlemen trying to charge for
those packets' transit of their networks.
-george william herbert
You mean consume electricity in cpu cycles on the end devices and all the
network middleboxes in between all over the world/Internet for dud data?
For what? Just to stop a debate instead of resolving it thought
intellectual brainstorming? For one thing it will slow down the TCP
connections as
I agree with Rahul, seems like pointless cycles along the entire path.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Rahul Sawarkar srahul...@gmail.comwrote:
You mean consume electricity in cpu cycles on the end devices and all the
network middleboxes in between all over the world/Internet for dud
Wow nanog, dissecting the architecture of a sarcastic proposal.
Maybe the joke would have been clearer if Matt had used the phrase a
modest proposal ..
On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Rahul, seems like pointless cycles along the entire path.
On
Subject: Re: A simple proposal
Wow nanog, dissecting the architecture of a sarcastic proposal.
Maybe the joke would have been clearer if Matt had used the phrase a
modest proposal ..
On Saturday, May 17, 2014, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Rahul, seems like pointless cycles
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:26 AM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
You want to stream a movie? No problem;
the video player opens up a second data
port back to a server next to the streaming
box; its only purpose is to accept a socket,
and send all bits received on it to
There's been a whole lot of chatter recently
about whether or not it's sensible to require
balanced peering ratios when selling heavily
unbalanced services to customers.
There's a very simple solution, it seems.
Just have every website, every streaming
service, every bit of consumable internet
12 matches
Mail list logo
