large networks have a security team
> that
> > monitors that email address regularly and will cooperate with you to
> > address the problem.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf
Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ronald F.
> Guilmette
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:50 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these
> schmucks?
>
>
> Sorry for
1. They aren’t the internet police either or so quite a few of them think
2. Hanlon’s razor
--srs
> On 15-Aug-2017, at 2:17 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
> Why are domain registrars allowing some of those domains, which are clearly
> advertising highly illegal
Den 14. aug. 2017 21.51 skrev "Ronald F. Guilmette" :
Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought to my attention that
my inclusion, in my prior posting, of various unsavory FQDNs resolving
to various IPv4 addresses on AS29073 has triggered some people's
spam filters.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:50 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these
schmucks?
Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought
Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought to my attention that
my inclusion, in my prior posting, of various unsavory FQDNs resolving
to various IPv4 addresses on AS29073 has triggered some people's
spam filters. (Can't imagine why. :-) So I am re-posting this message
now, with just a link
6 matches
Mail list logo