Re: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

2017-08-28 Thread Johann
large networks have a security team > that > > monitors that email address regularly and will cooperate with you to > > address the problem. > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf

Re: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

2017-08-24 Thread Troy Mursch
Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ronald F. > Guilmette > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:50 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these > schmucks? > > > Sorry for

Re: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

2017-08-14 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
1. They aren’t the internet police either or so quite a few of them think 2. Hanlon’s razor --srs > On 15-Aug-2017, at 2:17 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > Why are domain registrars allowing some of those domains, which are clearly > advertising highly illegal

Re: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

2017-08-14 Thread Baldur Norddahl
Den 14. aug. 2017 21.51 skrev "Ronald F. Guilmette" : Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought to my attention that my inclusion, in my prior posting, of various unsavory FQDNs resolving to various IPv4 addresses on AS29073 has triggered some people's spam filters.

RE: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

2017-08-14 Thread Siegel, David
-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 1:50 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks? Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought

AS29073, 196.16.0.0/14, Level3: Why does anyone peer with these schmucks?

2017-08-14 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
Sorry for the re-post, but it has been brought to my attention that my inclusion, in my prior posting, of various unsavory FQDNs resolving to various IPv4 addresses on AS29073 has triggered some people's spam filters. (Can't imagine why. :-) So I am re-posting this message now, with just a link