On 2018-07-09 17:24, Fredrik Korsbäck wrote:
> On 2018-07-06 21:18, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been casually observing the connectivity to Bitcanal / AS3266 /
>> AS197426 since the thread started.
>>
>> After GTT shared that bitcanal had been disconnected, bitcanal was only
>>
> Adjustments have been made and we are no longer accepting these.
Indeed - I no longer see these routes from you. Thanks :)
We saw these announcements from GigaPix and ESPANIX route servers.
Adjustments have been made and we are no longer accepting these.
--
Rob Mosher
Senior Network and Software Engineer
Hurricane Electric / AS6939
On 7/9/2018 11:43 AM, Phil Lavin wrote:
The only routes i can see now for
> The only routes i can see now for 3266/197426 is two /24 v4 and one /29 v6
> that jumps on over to portugal through 1299
> (telia) -> 174 (cogent) -> 29003 (refertelecom / iptelecom).
6939 (HE) are still advertising the routes to their customers. That suggests
that 197426 is still active on
On 2018-07-06 21:18, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been casually observing the connectivity to Bitcanal / AS3266 /
> AS197426 since the thread started.
>
> After GTT shared that bitcanal had been disconnected, bitcanal was only
> visible behind Cogent. But the Cogent path now also
Hi,
I've been casually observing the connectivity to Bitcanal / AS3266 /
AS197426 since the thread started.
After GTT shared that bitcanal had been disconnected, bitcanal was only
visible behind Cogent. But the Cogent path now also seems to have been
disconnected. After Cogent they popped up
: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:57 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity
providers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 20:23, Job Snijders wrote:
> I'm very happy FranceIX apply filters - however Bitcanal is known to
> submit fabricated/falsifi
GTT takes all AUP violations extremely seriously. Any offending parties mentioned in this thread
have been dealt with accordingly, and GTT now considers the matter resolved from its side.
On 6/25/2018 9:49 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Sometimes I see stuff that just makes me shake my head
Hi Job, all,
On the France-IX route servers, we are applying filters based on IRR
DBs. I double checked the list https://pastebin.com/raw/Jw1my9Bb and
these prefixes should be filtered if bitcanal starts announcing them.
Currently, bitcanal/AS197426 is not announcing any prefix on our route
telligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Job Snijders"
> To: "Mike Hammett"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:30:05 PM
On 26/Jun/18 20:31, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Authoritative list of shame with supporting evidence? (Yes, I assume there
> isn't one and that one would have to be created.)
>
> Many network operators aren't going to know who's supposed to be on that list
> and who isn't.
I tend to agree - I
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 09:57:14PM +0200, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 20:23, Job Snijders wrote:
> > I'm very happy FranceIX apply filters - however Bitcanal is known to
> > submit fabricated/falsified IRR information to databases like RADB
> > and RIPE. I've reported
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018, at 20:23, Job Snijders wrote:
> I'm very happy FranceIX apply filters - however Bitcanal is known to
> submit fabricated/falsified IRR information to databases like RADB and
> RIPE. I've reported this multiple times over the years to IRR database
> operators.
>
> In
--- Original Message -
>
> From: "Job Snijders"
> To: "Simon Muyal"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:23:55 PM
> Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity
> providers
>
> Dear Simon,
>
-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Job Snijders"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2018 1:30:05 PM
Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity
providers
On Tu
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 12:28, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Any solution to that? Yell at the IRRs more?
Or more generally, everyone involved should consider to stop selling
services to well-known BGP hijackers.
Kind regards,
Job
une 26, 2018 1:23:55 PM
Subject: Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity
providers
Dear Simon,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:13:26PM -0600, Simon Muyal wrote:
> On the France-IX route servers, we are applying filters based on IRR
> DBs. I double checked the lis
Dear Simon,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:13:26PM -0600, Simon Muyal wrote:
> On the France-IX route servers, we are applying filters based on IRR
> DBs. I double checked the list https://pastebin.com/raw/Jw1my9Bb and
> these prefixes should be filtered if bitcanal starts announcing them.
>
(I've updated the email subject to make it more accurate)
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:18:19PM -0400, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> Unless of course they are not actually on an IXP listed.
Of course.
> Bitcanal is not a member of TorIX and as far as I recall, never has
> been. The IP they list in
19 matches
Mail list logo
