Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?

2010-01-02 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
If our friend here is checking for spamhaus.rg he's out of luck. I am sure he'll have better luck checking for spamhaus.ORG instead --srs On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 6:41 PM, John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com wrote: On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) Raymond Dijkxhoorn

EDNS (Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?)

2010-01-01 Thread Paul Vixie
Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com writes: Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving 'XXX.YYY.ZZZ/A' (in 'YYY.ZZZ'?): disabling EDNS Do you have a firewall in front of this server that limits DNS packets to 512 bytes? statistically speaking, yes, most people have that.

Re: EDNS (Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?)

2010-01-01 Thread bmanning
On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 09:44:13PM +, Paul Vixie wrote: Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com writes: Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving 'XXX.YYY.ZZZ/A' (in 'YYY.ZZZ'?): disabling EDNS Do you have a firewall in front of this server that limits DNS packets to

Re: EDNS (Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?)

2010-01-01 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams
On 1/1/10 4:44 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: ... it's going to be another game of chicken -- will the people who build and/or deploy such crapware lose their jobs, or will ICANN back down from DNSSEC? Either (a) a large cohort of entries is added to the root before [pick predicate condition of

Re: EDNS (Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?)

2010-01-01 Thread Paul Vixie
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 22:16:31 + From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com It would help if the BIND EDNS0 negotiation would not fall back to the 512 byte limit - perhaps you could talk with the ISC developers about that. i don't agree that your proposed change would help

Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?

2009-12-31 Thread Xaver Aerni
Hello, Are this Blacklistservers since x-mas down. We receive in the last days many errors from this servers... Exemple enclosed Anonymsed. Greeting Xaver Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving 'XXX.cn-kr.blackholes.us/A' (in 'cn-kr.blackholes.us'?): disabling EDNS

Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?

2009-12-31 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! Are this Blacklistservers since x-mas down. We receive in the last days many errors from this servers... Exemple enclosed Anonymsed. Greeting Xaver Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving 'XXX.cn-kr.blackholes.us/A' (in 'cn-kr.blackholes.us'?): disabling

Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?

2009-12-31 Thread John Peach
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) Raymond Dijkxhoorn raym...@prolocation.net wrote: Hi! Are this Blacklistservers since x-mas down. We receive in the last days many errors from this servers... Exemple enclosed Anonymsed. Greeting Xaver Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2

Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?

2009-12-31 Thread Jason Bertoch
Xaver Aerni wrote: Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving 'XXX.YYY.ZZZ/A' (in 'YYY.ZZZ'?): disabling EDNS Do you have a firewall in front of this server that limits DNS packets to 512 bytes?