RE: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-05 Thread Brian Turnbow via NANOG

>You wouldn't download a boat ;)

Wouldn't that be a boatload?

Sorry it's Monday morning and I could resist...




Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Terrence de Kat
Yes. Much like cars.


-- 
Regards,
   Terrence de Kat, PhD/MTh/BPsy
     Darkness Reigns (Holding) B.V.

Please quote relevant replies.

From: Mel Beckman 
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2023 02:41
To: Terrence de Kat
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

> Sure you would. Water companies have reservoirs, and often people put boats 
> in the water, move them from dock to dock, take them out of the water, and 
> occasionally they get stolen. It’s not the water companies fault.
>
> -mel via cell
>
>> On Jun 3, 2023, at 3:08 PM, Terrence de Kat  
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> You wouldn't download a boat ;)
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Regards,
>>    Terrence de Kat, PhD/MTh/BPsy
>>      Darkness Reigns (Holding) B.V.
>>
>> Please quote relevant replies.
>>
>> From: Mel Beckman 
>> Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2023 00:06
>> To: William Herrin
>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?
>>
>>> William, 
>>>
>>> But still, boats :) 
>>>
>>> -mel 
>>>
>>> > On Jun 3, 2023, at 2:58 PM, William Herrin  wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:03 PM Michael Thomas  wrote: 
>>> >> Am I missing something? 
>>> > 
>>> > That it's old news from 2019? Cox and RIAA are in the appeals process 
>>> > from the 2019 verdict. 
>>> > 
>>> > -- 
>>> > William Herrin 
>>> > b...@herrin.us 
>>> > https://bill.herrin.us/ 


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Mel Beckman
Sure you would. Water companies have reservoirs, and often people put boats in 
the water, move them from dock to dock, take them out of the water, and 
occasionally they get stolen. It’s not the water companies fault.

-mel via cell

On Jun 3, 2023, at 3:08 PM, Terrence de Kat  
wrote:



You wouldn't download a boat ;)

--
Regards,
   Terrence de Kat, PhD/MTh/BPsy
 Darkness Reigns (Holding) B.V.

Please quote relevant replies.

From: Mel Beckman 
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2023 00:06
To: William Herrin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?


William,

But still, boats :)

-mel

> On Jun 3, 2023, at 2:58 PM, William Herrin  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:03 PM Michael Thomas  wrote:
>> Am I missing something?
>
> That it's old news from 2019? Cox and RIAA are in the appeals process
> from the 2019 verdict.
>
> --
> William Herrin
> b...@herrin.us
> https://bill.herrin.us/


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Michael Thomas



On 6/3/23 4:24 PM, William Herrin wrote:

On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 4:09 PM Michael Thomas  wrote:

How can the RIAA even know? I mean, are they putting up honey pots or
something?

IIRC, they went after folks sharing the files via bit torrent rather
than folks who only downloaded them.

Oh yeah. This oh-so-two decades ago. I can't believe this sort of thing 
is still going on. What a pointless waste of money.


Mike



Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 4:09 PM Michael Thomas  wrote:
> How can the RIAA even know? I mean, are they putting up honey pots or
> something?

IIRC, they went after folks sharing the files via bit torrent rather
than folks who only downloaded them.


-- 
William Herrin
b...@herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Michael Thomas



On 6/3/23 4:01 PM, William Herrin wrote:

On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:51 PM Mel Beckman  wrote:

It’s like blaming water companies for people stealing boats :)

It's been a while and the article is light on the facts of the case,
but IIRC what happened was: RIAA made some DMCA complaints to Cox. Cox
decided that since they were the network rather than the host, they
couldn't "remove" the offending material, wouldn't cut the user's
access and, because they have such respect for customer privacy,
wouldn't tell the RIAA who the customers were unless RIAA subpoenaed
them under a John Doe suit.

The court decided that Cox's behavior was sufficient to waive the
DMCA's liability shield for Internet providers and off they went to
trial.


How can the RIAA even know? I mean, are they putting up honey pots or 
something?


Mike



Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:51 PM Mel Beckman  wrote:
> It’s like blaming water companies for people stealing boats :)

It's been a while and the article is light on the facts of the case,
but IIRC what happened was: RIAA made some DMCA complaints to Cox. Cox
decided that since they were the network rather than the host, they
couldn't "remove" the offending material, wouldn't cut the user's
access and, because they have such respect for customer privacy,
wouldn't tell the RIAA who the customers were unless RIAA subpoenaed
them under a John Doe suit.

The court decided that Cox's behavior was sufficient to waive the
DMCA's liability shield for Internet providers and off they went to
trial.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin
b...@herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Terrence de Kat
You wouldn't download a boat ;)


-- 
Regards,
   Terrence de Kat, PhD/MTh/BPsy
     Darkness Reigns (Holding) B.V.

Please quote relevant replies.

From: Mel Beckman 
Sent: Sunday, 4 June 2023 00:06
To: William Herrin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

> William, 
>
> But still, boats :) 
>
> -mel 
>
> > On Jun 3, 2023, at 2:58 PM, William Herrin  wrote: 
> > 
> > On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:03 PM Michael Thomas  wrote: 
> >> Am I missing something? 
> > 
> > That it's old news from 2019? Cox and RIAA are in the appeals process 
> > from the 2019 verdict. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > William Herrin 
> > b...@herrin.us 
> > https://bill.herrin.us/ 


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Mel Beckman
William,

But still, boats :)

 -mel

> On Jun 3, 2023, at 2:58 PM, William Herrin  wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:03 PM Michael Thomas  wrote:
>> Am I missing something?
> 
> That it's old news from 2019? Cox and RIAA are in the appeals process
> from the 2019 verdict.
> 
> -- 
> William Herrin
> b...@herrin.us
> https://bill.herrin.us/


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread William Herrin
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 2:03 PM Michael Thomas  wrote:
> Am I missing something?

That it's old news from 2019? Cox and RIAA are in the appeals process
from the 2019 verdict.

-- 
William Herrin
b...@herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/


Re: Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Mel Beckman
It’s like blaming water companies for people stealing boats :)

 -mel beckman

> On Jun 3, 2023, at 2:06 PM, Michael Thomas  wrote:
> 
> 
> Apparently the RIAA is back suing ISP's (Cox in this case) for users pirating 
> music. It was pretty bogus back then, but with the uptake of TLS for almost 
> everything and DoH to conceal DNS requests what exactly is an ISP supposed to 
> do these days? Throw in a VPN and the pirates completely cut out the ISP.
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> 
> https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/02/2043209/music-pirates-are-not-terrorists-record-labels-argue-in-court
> 
> Mike
> 


Are we back to the 2000's again?

2023-06-03 Thread Michael Thomas



Apparently the RIAA is back suing ISP's (Cox in this case) for users 
pirating music. It was pretty bogus back then, but with the uptake of 
TLS for almost everything and DoH to conceal DNS requests what exactly 
is an ISP supposed to do these days? Throw in a VPN and the pirates 
completely cut out the ISP.


Am I missing something?


https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/06/02/2043209/music-pirates-are-not-terrorists-record-labels-argue-in-court

Mike