Mike, you might want to reference this thread -
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-July/thread.html#87147 -
as another data point. LLNW was sending data at levels ~ 10x greater
than my policed DSL user's subscription rates. It seems to me that
either the client or the server TCP
016 18:29:38 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
Mike,
I have the right contact there and I'll flag this thread that way in
case they havent already seen it.
Best,
Martin Hannigan
AS 20940 // AS 32787
On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote:
&
;, NANOG <
> nanog@nanog.org <javascript:;>>
> Sent: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:28:17 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
>
>
> I have seen traffic from Microsoft in Europe to single hosts on our
> campus that seemed to be unusually (high bps) and
2016 16:28:17 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
I have seen traffic from Microsoft in Europe to single hosts on our campus
that seemed to be unusually (high bps) and long.
I don’t recall if the few multiple hosts I noticed this on over time were
only on our campus wifi.
If not perhaps the
ke Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:19:35 PM
> Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
>
> I will forward to the requisite group for a look. Have yo
..@ics-il.net>
> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:19:35 PM
> Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
>
>
> Mike,
>
> I will forward to the requisite group for a look. Have you brought this to
> our attention previously? I
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:19:35 PM
Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
Mike,
I will forward to the requisite group for a look. Have you brought this to our
attention previously? I don't see anything. If you did, please forward me the
ticket numbers or message(s) (peering@ is best) so we
Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
> To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:08:55 AM
&g
more platforms.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:08:
:: I have made this into a Google Form to make it easier to
:: track compared to randomly formatted responses on multiple
:: mailing lists, Facebook Groups, etc.
Yeah, because...
but I don't do email like that
why is it hard to read?
it's really hard to read email this way.
because it's
nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 9:32:58 AM
Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
It appears all complaints are from SP doing wireless. I am going to go with
a yes and put forth a these that these guys have a common factor somewhere.
It could be equipment from a some popular vendor of w
It appears all complaints are from SP doing wireless. I am going to go with
a yes and put forth a these that these guys have a common factor somewhere.
It could be equipment from a some popular vendor of wireless or maybe some
common method to throttle that is popular in the wireless community.
I
WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:34:48 PM
Subject: CDN Overload?
I participate on a few other mailing lists focused on eyeball networks. For a
couple ye
;baldur.nordd...@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:02:30 AM
Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
How come we have never seen this problem? We have a ton of DSL and many
of those are slow, but no customer complaints about overloaded lines
from CDN networks.
Could it be
How come we have never seen this problem? We have a ton of DSL and many
of those are slow, but no customer complaints about overloaded lines
from CDN networks.
Could it be that the way you throttle the bandwidth is defect? It is
easy to blame the other guy but could it be that you are doing
* Jon Lewis:
> This is kind of a funny problem though, because CDNs get paid to
> deliver data, and they get compared/graded according to who can
> deliver the bits the fastest...and here you are complaining that
> they're delivering the bits too fast (or at least faster than you'd
> like them
Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:34:48 PM
Subject: CDN Overload?
I participate on a few other mailing lists focused on
@cbcast.com>
Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 2:44:24 AM
Subject: Re: CDN Overload?
On 20 Sep 2016 9:14 am, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>
> Now lets move the Windows 10 updates. A 'buried in the st
On 20 Sep 2016 9:14 am, "George Skorup" wrote:
>
> Now lets move the Windows 10 updates. A 'buried in the sticks' customer
on Canopy 900 FSK. 1.5Mbps/384k. Multiple streams from Microsoft and LLNW
at the same time. LLNW alone had maybe 10 streams going and was sending at
over
g.org>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:34:48 PM
Subject: CDN Overload?
I participate on a few other mailing lists focused on eyeball networks. For a
couple years I've been hearing complaints from this CDN or that CDN was
behaving badly. It's been severely ramping up the past few mo
Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 12:34:48 PM
Subject: CDN Overload?
I participate on a few other
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Mike Hammett wrote:
The principal complaint is that upstream of whatever is doing the rate
limiting for a given customer there is significantly more capacity being
utilized than the customer has purchased. This could happen briefly as
TCP adjusts to the capacity
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> These situations effectively shut out all other Internet traffic to that
> customer or even portion of the network for low capacity NLOS areas
I think the growing gap between those with high speed links and so-called
I participate on a few other mailing lists focused on eyeball networks. For a
couple years I've been hearing complaints from this CDN or that CDN was
behaving badly. It's been severely ramping up the past few months. There have
been some wild allegations, but I would like to develop a bit more
24 matches
Mail list logo