Paul Ferguson expunged (fergdawgs...@gmail.com):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR
):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR these days. :-)
They said it costs ~US$90k, and that ATT
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Gregory Hicks ghi...@hicks-net.net wrote:
The press release at
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html states that the
pricing for the CRS-3 STARTS AT $90K...
Is that the cost for a nameplate you can stick on an empty rack with
dark glass so you
Cisco and linerate...if it would be a Juniper I could say OK, on a Cisco, first
see then believe.
Also, seeing CRS-1's, is the '3' in CRS-3 the multiplier or magnitude of
problems to be expected compared to its 'little' buggy sister.. ? :)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Snyder
JUNIPER Networks did a press note about the new T-1600 components:
http://www.juniper.net/us/en/company/press-center/press-releases/2010/pr_2010_02_04-08_30.html
And now CISCO with the new components for the CRS-1 ... to increase it
to new CRS-3.
Both companies looks like want to reach 4 Tbps
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Bob Snyder wrote:
Linecards are interesting. We get a 100Gb card, we get a linerate
14-port 10Gb card, but apparently there's still only a single port
OC-768 40Gb card.
There has been claims that volume for OC-768 is low so no major effort has
been seen to reduce OC-768
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every motion picture ever created in less than four minutes
If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing
If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
Brian
The article about this in the tech section on CNN
already has comments in it like Oh, well Cisco
owns Linksys and I have a Linksys router so will
my ISP be updating me to the CRS-3 so I can
download at those speeds? LOL
It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run.
On Mar 9, 2010 1:53 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1
On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run.
Maybe Peter Lothberg is testing one in his basement? :)
-b
Yes, it says that right in the press release.
J
--
Joel Esler
joel.es...@me.com
http://www.joelesler.net
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010, at 03:09PM, Brandon Galbraith
brandon.galbra...@gmail.com wrote:
It was mentioned that Att is already testing this with a 100gbps fiber run.
On Mar 9, 2010
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement
already? :-)
She said it was great for drying her clothes.
If she gets the CRS-3, will she be able to dry her clothes even faster?
On 3/9/2010 11:54 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
The article about this in the tech section
What happened to CRS-2? :)
--Original Message--
From: Robert Enger - NANOG
To: David Hubbard
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CRS-3
Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement
already? :-)
She said it was great for drying her
LOL! Wow that is a pretty sad comment..
But back to the CRS-3, just wow!!!
Subject: RE: CRS-3
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:54:16 -0500
From: dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfe...@mac.com]
So who is going to be the first to deploy
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Brandon Kim wrote:
LOL! Wow that is a pretty sad comment..
But back to the CRS-3, just wow!!!
Wow what?
Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per slot
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:51:28 -0500
Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
Is that about 11 giggitybits per second?
-
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote
If nothing else you gotta love the Cisco Marketing machine!
Indeed Cisco marketing machine.
Nothing new to CRS-1, just new linecards and route-processor.
It would be like giving the CAT6500 a new name back when the
SUP720/DCEF
Subject: Re: CRS-3
Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS1 in her basement
already? :-)
She said it was great for drying her clothes.
If she gets the CRS-3, will she be able to dry her clothes even faster?
On 3/9/2010 11:54 AM, David
Wow what?
Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per
slot,
and pre-release equipment is in use in some networks already.
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?
Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco.
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber,
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 20:22 +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to CRS-2? :)
It exploded and was destroyed during construction. Parts of it were
also recycled to build the next CRS. |8^)
--
/*=[ Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net ]=+
| Packet Plumber,
Renaming the 6500? Nice one, let's call it 7600 then :-)
Arjan
-Original Message-
From: bas [mailto:kilo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tue 3/9/2010 9:33 PM
To: Brian Feeny
Cc: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: Re: CRS-3
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote
If nothing
Yes, and their stock price dipped today after the news release actually hit.
So remember people, buy on rumor, sell on news.
Brian
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Express Web Systems wrote:
Wow what?
Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
If you look
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every motion picture ever created in less than
On 3/9/2010 4:39 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every
On 9. mars 2010, at 22.39, Tim Durack wrote:
This intelligence also includes carrier-grade IPv6 (CGv6)
Can't wait to find out what this is.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/white_paper_c11-558744-00_ns1017_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html
--
Joachim
It's teh future of the tubes! Didn't you get the memo?
Nah, actually it is just hardware assisted SP-wide NAT... See:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/white_paper_c11-558744-00_ns1017_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html
Cisco believes that this is the
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?
Because in some organisations, the only vendor that matters is Cisco.
Then why bother hyping at all?
Anyone who
It only supported IPv5. :)
Scott
[1]deles...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to CRS-2? :)
--Original Message--
From: Robert Enger - NANOG
To: David Hubbard
Cc: [2]na...@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CRS-3
Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:02:01PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?
Because in some organisations, the
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 20:22 +, deles...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to CRS-2? :)
It exploded and was destroyed during construction. Parts of it were
also recycled to build the next CRS. |8^)
/me sits back patiently
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind they
are?
Because in some organisations, the only
No one ever got fired for buying Cisco?
(This isn't true btw -- I know of people that did get fired for buying Cisco.
Just saying...)
J
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype
It's called doing the wall street dance. Their stock price jumped 3%
yesterday in anticipation of the big announcement. Hype is hype, and
people still remember the magic of the dotcom bubble. ZOMG! They increased
the size of the tubez! BUY! BUY!
[full disclosure: I own stock in Cisco]
Tom
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 18:45 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any errors.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 17:31, Jake Khuon kh...@neebu.net wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:02 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Express Web Systems
mailingli...@expresswebsystems.com wrote:
Wow what?
Is there anything in the CRS-3 that competitors are not shipping _today_?
If you look at some startups, they are doing 4-5 times as many Gbps per
slot,
and pre-release equipment
-Original Message-
From: Tim Durack
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:39 PM
To: Brian Feeny
Subject: Re: CRS-3
This intelligence also includes carrier-grade IPv6 (CGv6)
Can't wait to find out what this is.
accelerating the delivery of compelling new experiences
Sounds like
Spend the GDP of a small nation on a single box!
-Original Message-
From: Brian Feeny [mailto:bfe...@mac.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:51 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org list
Subject: CRS-3
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Matthew Petach wrote:
/me sits back patiently and waits for CRS-5, then...[1]
CRS-3 is ~3 times as fast as CRS-1, so I guess the next iteration will be
CRS-12 and then CRS-36, CRS-108 (perhaps CRS-100 just to make it easy).
:P
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Brian Feeny bfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every motion picture ever created in less than
I fail to see how using linksys's range of products is going to be comparable
to enterprise grade cisco gear. Well, your average consumer wouldn't be
involved with a CRS or for that matter, anything that remotely resembles a CRS.
Not sure why you'd pull the consumer market into this marketing
On 3/9/2010 9:19 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Brian Feenybfe...@mac.com wrote:
So who is going to be the first to deploy these?
http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2010/prod_030910.html
- Download the entire Library of Congress in just over 1 second
- Stream every
the
marketspeak.
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
Or perhaps more interestingly, given the way things seem to be going, how
many (tens of?) millions of RIB entries it'll allow?
Just curious
-
From: Patrick W. Gilmore [mailto:patr...@ianai.net]
Sent: Tue 3/9/2010 11:02 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: CRS-3
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 15:29 -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The only wow here is wow, why did cisco hype how far behind
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost?
Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR these days. :-)
They said it costs ~US$90k, and that ATT was in trails.
Somehow, I'm skeptical (not of the trials
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, David Conrad wrote:
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost? Or
how much power it would consume? Or how much heat it would generate?
Power is fairly easy, you need somewhere in the order of 14kW per rack (at
least you need to provision
Subject: Re: CRS-3
From: David Conrad d...@virtualized.org
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:06:39 -0800
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Anyone have any idea how much a fully configured CRS-3 would cost?
Admittedly, my information on these topics comes from NPR these
days
47 matches
Mail list logo
