With the latest IOS you MUST use loopback addresses or the Tunnel will not
form, regardless of the class settings especially if using a L3 router
temination device(s).
SRR
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Jeff Saxe wrote:
> From: Jeff Saxe
> Subject: RE: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and lo
freed...@uk.clara.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 1:35 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback Ips
>
> >> interface WAN1 (actually a gigether)
> >> ip unnumbered loopback0 (or no ip addr?)
> >>
>
&g
It is L2TPv3 I think that Sprint is using for there "MPLS" offer and
Sprint Link Frame Service.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Saxe [mailto:js...@briworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 7:29 AM
To:; James Smallacombe
Subject: RE: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and lo
On 11/11/2010 12:50 PM, James Smallacombe wrote:
Point-to-point (non-multi-access) interfaces only
Yeah, it's evil. I don't see a cisco equiv to state it's point to point
(you can tell ISIS it is, but not define the interface as such).
However, I'm not sure of the limitations or associated
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Dave Temkin wrote:
From a VZ IP circuit that I have:
interface Loopback0
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255 (actual assigned mask is 255.255.255.252)
interface Serial0/0/0
bandwidth 1536
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0/0
Works great for me acr
>> We will need to set up a L2TPV3 tunnel to their old location (single
>> homed, no BGP on that side). Upon initial reading of Cisco docs to do
>> this, we will need a routable IP on a loopback interface for starters.
Also, like any other tunnel, beware of MTU issues, these are so
routinely for
_
From: David Freedman [david.freed...@uk.clara.net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:22 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Ciscos, BGP, L2TPV3 pseudowires and loopback IPs
e.
>
> We will need to set up a L2TPV3 tunnel to their old location (single
> homed, no BGP on that sid
>> interface WAN1 (actually a gigether)
>> ip unnumbered loopback0 (or no ip addr?)
>>
>That's not correct.
Actually, was fixating on the fact that he has ethernet WAN and last I
checked IOS doesn't have unnumbered-to-ethernet capability (well not true,
recently they introduced unnumbered SV
David Freedman wrote:
e.
We will need to set up a L2TPV3 tunnel to their old location (single
homed, no BGP on that side). Upon initial reading of Cisco docs to do
this, we will need a routable IP on a loopback interface for starters.
I'm pretty sure this is just a recommendation base
e.
>
> We will need to set up a L2TPV3 tunnel to their old location (single
> homed, no BGP on that side). Upon initial reading of Cisco docs to do
> this, we will need a routable IP on a loopback interface for starters.
I'm pretty sure this is just a recommendation based on good practise
(route
A simpler question(s) than it sounds:
Customer just brought up their first BGP session at a new location. It is
up fine with a full routing table, the second provider hookup is a few
weeks away.
The provider allocated a /24 (x.x.1.0/24) for the network and a /30 for
the PTP connection (x.x
11 matches
Mail list logo
