Tim Durack wrote:
I was under the impression Cogent no longer did the multi-hop BGP thing,
but then I got a copy of their NA user guide, and saw the peer-a/peer-b
configuration. Not a fan.
Anyone know if this is still required for Cogent IP transit service?
(on/off list is fine.)
A/B
I was under the impression Cogent no longer did the multi-hop BGP thing,
but then I got a copy of their NA user guide, and saw the peer-a/peer-b
configuration. Not a fan.
Anyone know if this is still required for Cogent IP transit service?
(on/off list is fine.)
--
Tim:
-- Create Wireless Coverage's with www.towercoverage.com - 900Mhz - LTE - 3G -
3.65 - TV Whitespace
-Original Message-
From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:20 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Cogent multi-hop BGP
I was under the impression
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Tim Durack wrote:
I was under the impression Cogent no longer did the multi-hop BGP thing,
but then I got a copy of their NA user guide, and saw the peer-a/peer-b
configuration. Not a fan.
Anyone know if this is still required for Cogent IP transit service?
(on/off list is
On Aug 28, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression Cogent no longer did the multi-hop BGP thing,
but then I got a copy of their NA user guide, and saw the peer-a/peer-b
configuration. Not a fan.
Anyone know if this is still required for Cogent IP
As an update to interested parties: I have been informed that Cogent no
longer do the A/B peer config. This is a documentation bug apparently.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Tim Durack tdur...@gmail.com wrote:
I was under the impression Cogent no longer did the multi-hop BGP thing,
but
6 matches
Mail list logo
