Colton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>
> To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>, "Luke Guillory"
> <lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Mond
>>> you will see that they are on both sides east & west.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 30
3-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> > supp...@snappytelecom.net
> >
> > --
> >
> > *From: *"Colton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>
> > *To: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
>
<(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Colton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> *Cc: *"Mike H
: "Luke Guillory" <lguill...@reservetele.com>
> To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>, "Colton Conor"
> <colton.co...@gmail.com>
> Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:13:10 PM
> Subjec
lp-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email:
> supp...@snappytelecom.net
>
> --
>
> *From: *"Colton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> *Cc:
snappytelecom.net>
> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>, "Luke Guillory"
> <lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 4:14:19 PM
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> Th
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+lguillory=reservetele@nanog.org] On
> Behalf Of Colton Conor
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:32 PM
> To: Mike Hammett
> Cc: nanog list
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
>
> I guess
-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+lguillory=reservetele@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of Colton Conor
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:32 PM
To: Mike Hammett
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
I guess that makes sense. The plus or minus some is the question. FS is
claiming
: Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Thanks for the answers. From the sounds of it, no one knows the real difference
between the expansion port, 1310 port, and 1550 port. For real world
applications, I would assume t
Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> Cc: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>, "Luke Guillory" <
> lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14:19 PM
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optic
Monday, June 19, 2017 3:14 PM
To: Faisal Imtiaz
Cc: Mike Hammett; Luke Guillory; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Thanks for the answers. From the sounds of it, no one knows the real difference
between the expansion port, 1310 port, and 1550 port. For real world
applicati
Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>
To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
Cc: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>, "Luke Guillory"
<lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:
om>
> *To: *"Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
> *Cc: *"Luke Guillory" <lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list" <
> nanog@nanog.org>, "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> *Sent: *Monday, June 19, 2017 3:30:37 PM
>
uot;Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:39:00 PM
> Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
>
> And how would he pass his current 40g through that mux? Unless I'm
> misreading
Pics came in on my side, that's when I figured you were saying 1 40g plus 10s.
-Original Message-
From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:50 PM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Colton Conor; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
I
olton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>, "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:47:29 PM
> Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> Gotcha, figured I misread it. Sorry it's Monday.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> F
Gotcha, figured I misread it. Sorry it's Monday.
-Original Message-
From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:45 PM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Colton Conor; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Let me try to explain better
-
From: "Luke Guillory" <lguill...@reservetele.com>
To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:39:00 PM
Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
And how would he pass his cur
; To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> Cc: "Colton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com>, "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:39:00 PM
> Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> And how would he pass his current 4
Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:27 PM
To: Luke Guillory
Cc: Colton Conor; nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Bench test of the system, with the muxes...
sorry for the large pictures :)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 S
quot; <na...@ics-il.net>
> Cc: "Luke Guillory" <lguill...@reservetele.com>, "nanog list"
> <nanog@nanog.org>,
> "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:30:37 PM
> Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux usin
uot;Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>, "Colton Conor" <
> colton.co...@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> *Sent: *Monday, June 19, 2017 2:13:10 PM
> *Subject: *RE: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
>
>
> Faisa
: "Luke Guillory" <lguill...@reservetele.com>
To: "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net>, "Colton Conor"
<colton.co...@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:13:10 PM
Subject: RE: DWDM Mux/De
Of Faisal Imtiaz
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Colton Conor
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
Answers in-line below.
If you look at the CWDM Muxes (8 or 9 channel) you will notice a common
configuration of
Upgrade Port (expansion port) + 1450 or 1470
Subject: Re: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
The guys at fibrestore will point you in the right direction on all this if you
ask them these questions. They are actually very helpful and will assign you a
specialist to assist.
Original message
From: Colton Conor <colton
t; To: "nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 2:26:55 PM
> Subject: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
> We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+
> Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is
> a
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:26:55 -0500, Colton Conor wrote
[snip]
> Maybe I should just ditch the 40G QSFP+ optics and use all 10G optics,
> but the switches I am using have 48 10G SFP+ ports and 6 QSFP+ ports
> built in. I know there are 40G breakout cables, but the whole point of
> 40G is to
GMT+12:00)
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: DWDM Mux/Demux using 40G Optics
We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+
Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is
a QSFP+ Transceiver with a LC duplex head. We only have one pair of sing
We are building a 40G metro ring using 40-Gigabit Ethernet QSFP+
Transceivers. Specifically, we are using Juniper JNP-QSFP-40G-LR4. This is
a QSFP+ Transceiver with a LC duplex head. We only have one pair of single
mode dark fibers around the ring. Our distance between nodes around the
ring are
30 matches
Mail list logo
