Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-30 Thread gordon b slater
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 11:48 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: Take a vacuum cleaner with extensions. Make a set of end connectors A series of tubes anyone? I'd also show them the rrd/MRTG graph at the perimeter. Be clear to them about the units. Never miss the chance to ask for more budget

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-30 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.04.29 17:31, Robert Enger - NANOG wrote: 1) The capacity that a campus has into I2 or NLR is different than the BW the campus purchases from their commercial provider(s). 2) The commercial BW test sites are not optimized for speed. They do not have unlimited capacity network

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-30 Thread Jeff
On 4/30/10 3:15 AM, Steve Bertrand wrote: Your observation is disturbingly bleak... do you have a recommendation? ...perhaps a site with good bandwidth and a cluster of iperf(1) boxes available? :) There are better tools than a simple iperf server: http://psps.perfsonar.net/toolkit/

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-30 Thread Jeff Kell
On 4/30/2010 8:49 AM, Jeff wrote: There are better tools than a simple iperf server: http://psps.perfsonar.net/toolkit/ There is also http://netalyzr.icsi.berkeley.edu/ which is an excellent connectivity check, although your mileage may vary with higher-speed bandwidth testing from it. Jeff

Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Murphy, William
I work for an Edu with multi-gigabit Internet connectivity and I get questions from users saying Why am I only getting 14Mb when I run this speed test? I have got to believe that the various Internet speed tests (Speakeasy or dslreports) are rate limited to prevent someone from shutting them

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Robert Glover
Adjust your TCP window size. -Original Message- From: Murphy, William william.mur...@uth.tmc.edu Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:53:01 To: nanog@nanog.orgnanog@nanog.org Subject: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest I work for an Edu with multi-gigabit Internet connectivity and I get questions from

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Bret Clark
window size. -Original Message- From: Murphy, William william.mur...@uth.tmc.edu Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:53:01 To: nanog@nanog.orgnanog@nanog.org Subject: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest I work for an Edu with multi-gigabit Internet connectivity and I get questions from users saying Why

RE: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Blake Pfankuch
AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest All the new OS's (IE Windows7) automatically adjust TCP window size. Personally I've never found those website speed test to be that accurate on fast connections (over 15Mbps full duplex). The only way to really confirm

RE: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Scott Berkman
and expect accuracy? -Scott -Original Message- From: Bret Clark [mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:05 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest All the new OS's (IE Windows7) automatically adjust TCP window size

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Murphy, William william.mur...@uth.tmc.edu wrote: I work for an Edu with multi-gigabit Internet connectivity and I get questions from users saying Why am I only getting 14Mb when I run this speed test?  I have got to believe that the various Internet speed tests

Re: Edu versus Speakeasy Speedtest

2010-04-29 Thread Robert Enger - NANOG
1) The capacity that a campus has into I2 or NLR is different than the BW the campus purchases from their commercial provider(s). 2) The commercial BW test sites are not optimized for speed. They do not have unlimited capacity network connections. And, they have not tuned their network