On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:52 PM William Herrin wrote:
> YOUR use of PON makes reasonably good sense.
>
>
Features such as battery backup and ISDN is made for the explicit purpose
of office buildings, not residential use. The flexibility that we enjoy
will also work for office buildings. I do
I'd say that any carrier grade GPON gear is way overkill for a LAN and
you're going to have to run single mode fiber to use the consumer grade
ONTs which is a big extra expense as few structured wiring companies do
single mode. Second, Dasan Zhone is one of the vendors I'd absolutely
avoid and
gt;
> ----------
> *From: *"Alfie Pates"
> *To: *nanog@nanog.org
> *Sent: *Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:34:29 PM
> *Subject: *Re: Enterprise GPON / Zhone Questions
>
> The discussion was regarding an in-building LAN - residential access
> networks/
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:09 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:51 PM William Herrin wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:47 PM Baldur Norddahl
>> wrote:
>> > Compared to the traditional approach, you will only have one centralized
>> > GPON switch to manage. All the small
Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Alfie Pates"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 3:34:29 PM
Subject: Re: Enterprise GPON / Zhone Questions
The discussion was regarding an in-building LAN - resident
The discussion was regarding an in-building LAN - residential access
networks/WANs are a wholly different beast and GPON is fantastically
suitable for that particular problem.
There is, however, a reason that a lot of new mixed-use (business &&
residential) WAN fibre deployments end up building a
On 12/12/18 10:51 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> The AV lab gets screwed. You're running the coax they need through the
> noisy electrical riser because you didn't build dedicated comms risers
> and closets. Naturally nobody checked with them so you don't yet
> realize they can't do what they need to
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:51 PM William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:47 PM Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
> > Compared to the traditional approach, you will only have one centralized
> > GPON switch to manage. All the small ONT switches are managed through
> > this. Complaints about the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:47 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Compared to the traditional approach, you will only have one centralized
> GPON switch to manage. All the small ONT switches are managed through
> this. Complaints about the interface is vendor specific. Because there is only
> one
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:16 AM Aled Morris
wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 06:48, Baldur Norddahl
> wrote:
> > It is possible one should not choose this system over a traditional
> approach, but the people screaming "rip it out" are out of line IMHO. It
> would be a huge expense to rewire a
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 06:48, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> It is possible one should not choose this system over a traditional approach,
> but the people screaming "rip it out" are out of line IMHO. It would be a
> huge expense to rewire a building with copper and they already got a working
>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:16 AM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> I don't really have any advice to offer here (sorry), but I am curious how
> setting up a GPON LAN would save money vs just getting cheaper
> switches...and also what a GPON LAN even looks like. Does every office or
> classroom have an ONT?
>
I don't really have any advice to offer here (sorry), but I am curious how
setting up a GPON LAN would save money vs just getting cheaper
switches...and also what a GPON LAN even looks like. Does every office or
classroom have an ONT?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 10:53 AM Nick Bogle wrote:
> Hello
Hello fellow NANOG members :)
Let me start with a little bit of background, my day job is a Network
Engineer for a local university where we have primarily a Cisco environment
from phones to switching to routing, etc. Before my time, we hired a
contractor to design a GPON LAN system for a new
14 matches
Mail list logo
