> On Nov 10, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> because a /23 of ipv6 is very large :)
That’s a good reason not to use a /23, but not a good reason not to use IPv6.
>
> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
>
> #fios
>
No it’s not
On 11/12/14 11:49 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice
tunnel for that...
yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency
upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese an
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice
>>> tunnel for that...
>> yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency
>> upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese and mouse parts to be in the
>> middle o
>> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice
>> tunnel for that...
> yea.. because when the sh*t hits the fan I REALLY need a dependency
> upon a wonky tunnel server made of cheese and mouse parts to be in the
> middle of my work process?
wait a sec! there's cheese? where?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:27 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
>
>> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
>
> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for
> that...
yea.. because when
> I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel
> for that...
there is no such thing as a nice tunnel
just last week i was able to get a /23 from $ISP as part of my transit
purchase with them for one location, but you still have to explain and
justify your use to $ISP (who in-turn has to explain/justify to ARIN). if
you can't do that, it really is "just cuz i want it". like someone else
said previo
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel
for that...
Indeed. I've h
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:36:17 -0500, Christopher Morrow said:
> also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
I hear the chaps at Hurricane Electric can help you with a nice tunnel for
that...
pgpXkkUAc8thG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 01:00:54 AM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> why thought? Justification is really about having a use
> for the ips, right? and if you have 500
> servers/network-devices ... then you have justification
> for a /23 ... it seems to me.
Unless Equinix have an actual product
because a /23 of ipv6 is very large :)
also, it's hard to use ipv6 when your last miile provider doesn't offer it...
#fios
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
>
>
> -Bill
>
>
>> On Nov 10, 20
Why use IPv4 for OOB? Seems a little late in the day for that.
-Bill
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 15:02, "Christopher Morrow"
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. wrote:
>> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
>> justification
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Paul S. wrote:
> I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
> justification these days, sadly.
why thought? Justification is really about having a use for the ips,
right? and if you have 500 servers/network-devices ... then you have
justif
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:20:44AM -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> > Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
> > certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> Without explain
On 10 November 2014 15:20, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> > Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due
> to
> > certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> Without explaining the "rest
On 2014-11-10 15:20, Joe Greco wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
>> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
>> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
>
> Without explaining the "restraints," this
> Hey,
>
> VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
> Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
> certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
Without explaining the "restraints," this kinda boils down to "'cuz we
want it," which s
I'd be doubtful if anyone will feel like offering a /23 with OOB as
justification these days, sadly.
Good luck nonetheless.
On 11/10/2014 午後 11:00, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already a
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
/Ruairi
On 10 November 2014 14:38, Alistair Mackenzie wrote:
> Couldn't you put a router or VPN
Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving
you and use RFC1918 addressing space?
OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23.
On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggli
Dear List,
I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to
find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about
5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had
hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single
p
21 matches
Mail list logo
