Mattew,
We run high volume SSL but not nearly the 12Gbps you are talking about
so that hasn't been an issue for us. Thanks for the information. Looks like
the Citrix ANG rep owes me another lunch to explain himself. :)
I'm gonna do some research on NGINX...
-Hammer-
I was a normal
I've worked with everything over the years. BigIP, CSS, CSM, ACE (blows),
NetScaler, say when. I've been thru a few RFPs and bake offs and also
evaluated open source options.
1. If you are looking for simple round robin load balancing with decent load
capabilities then there are several open
Recommend: F5 and Citrix Netscaler. If you are looking to combine your L7 FW
into your LB then you might lean towards NetScaler. If you are looking at
seperating those duties you can look at F5. IRules (F5) are the bomb.
Except that under (Mozilla) load, Netscaler fell apart. F5, at the
We're using both an F5 BigIP as well as Nginx (open source software) in a
production environment.
They both have their merits, but when we recently came under some advanced
DDoSes (slowloris, slow POST, and more), we couldn't process certain types
of layer 7 insepction/modification because it was
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Welch, Bryan bryan.we...@arrisi.com wrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
software against commercially available off the shelf hardware such as F5,
which is what we currently use. We use the load
We've use Linux LVS for many many years with success.
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Welch, Bryan bryan.we...@arrisi.comwrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
software against commercially available
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:03 -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Welch, Bryan bryan.we...@arrisi.com wrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
software against commercially available off the shelf hardware such as
On 05/17/2011 08:23 AM, Tom Hill wrote:
I've worked with open source and commercial solutions, and while the
open source systems were almost always far more flexible, and cheaper
up front, they certainly required more work to get going.. Once setup
and running though both types of solutions had
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0700, Welch, Bryan wrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
software against commercially available off the shelf hardware such as F5,
which is what we currently use. We use the load balancers for
In message BANLkTimxkNx5=__jxd9056fao19v1zo...@mail.gmail.com, Michael Loftis
writes:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Welch, Bryan bryan.we...@arrisi.com wrot=
e:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing sof=
tware against commercially
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
[snip]
Better still would be for them to return records but until one
is ready to do that the negative responses need to be correct.
Hm... better would be for load balancers operate transparently at Layer 3 and
not tamper
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:57 AM, LaDerrick H. na...@lacutt.com wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:15:45PM -0700, Welch, Bryan wrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
software against commercially available off the shelf hardware such as F5,
In response to your query on dnssec in the browser, I use this.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/dnssec-validator/
--Original Message--
From: Jimmy Hess
To: Mark Andrews
Cc: Welch, Bryan
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Experience with Open Source load balancers?
Sent: May
I'll pile on here too - there's very little of Mozilla's web infrastructure
that isn't behind Zeus.
+1 for Zeus. Use it in our production network with great success.
Magnitudes cheaper than a solution from F5, and doesn't hide the inner
workings of the product if you want to do some things
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing software
against commercially available off the shelf hardware such as F5, which is what
we currently use. We use the load balancers for traditional load balancing,
full proxy for http/ssl traffic, ssl
S/W vs H/W is really a question rooted in performance and feature
needs vs cost... weigh your options carefully.
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Welch, Bryan bryan.we...@arrisi.com wrote:
Greetings all.
I've been tasked with comparing the use of open source load balancing
software against
We used Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound) on a couple of FreeBSD servers
some years ago.
Configuration is simple and the software has lots of good and interesting
features.
The only problem was that always our traffic had a spike, serving pages
through it became a nightmare.
Eventually we ended
17 matches
Mail list logo
