On Feb 5, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Birnbaum dav...@pins.net
wrote:
We have noticed a lot of issues with Asterisk 1.2 and some 1.4
rollouts.
FreePBX had some truck-sized holes in it.
Most/all of the big issues that existed in previous
Heya,
Has anyone done any research or have any anecdotal numbers related to
how common it is to have a SIP gateway sitting out on the Internet with no ACL
or authentication? Recently we have noticed a couple of instances where we get
abuse complaints from companies who claim that one
On 2/5/10 9:33 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Heya,
Has anyone done any research or have any anecdotal numbers related to
how common it is to have a SIP gateway sitting out on the Internet with no
ACL or authentication? Recently we have noticed a couple of instances where
we get abuse
If you are using Asterisk (and many derived PBXs), and your installation is old
enough, and your default context will complete a call...then you may find you
are giving free calling out. This was fixed at some point in the Asterisk
default configuration files.
We have noticed a lot of issues
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone done any research or have any anecdotal numbers related
to how common it is to have a SIP gateway sitting out on the Internet
with no ACL or authentication? Recently we have noticed a couple of
instances where we get abuse complaints from
On 05/02/2010 17:33, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone done any research or have any anecdotal numbers related to how common
it is to have a SIP gateway sitting out on the Internet with no ACL or authentication?
Recently we have noticed a couple of instances where we get abuse complaints
On 05/02/2010 17:33, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone done any research or have any anecdotal numbers related
to how common it is to have a SIP gateway sitting out on the Internet with
no ACL or authentication? Recently we have noticed a couple of instances
where we get abuse complaints
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:45:13PM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote:
We have noticed a lot of issues with Asterisk 1.2 and some 1.4 rollouts.
FreePBX had some truck-sized holes in it.
FreePBX 2.6.0 defaults to refusing anonymous SIP calls. If you enable
inbound anonymous calls, it includes only
I should have prefaced that with older installations as well. As far as we
can see, most of the newer packages have fixed the known truck-sized holes in
their default configurations, but given the lack of any formal framework for
testing this stuff, even the big switches have been found to
, February 05, 2010 1:22 PM
To: Brandon Ewing
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways?
I should have prefaced that with older installations as well. As far as we
can see, most of the newer packages have fixed the known truck-sized holes in
their default configurations
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:45 AM, David Birnbaum dav...@pins.net wrote:
We have noticed a lot of issues with Asterisk 1.2 and some 1.4 rollouts.
FreePBX had some truck-sized holes in it.
Most/all of the big issues that existed in previous version of
Asterisk/FreePBX have been resolved in later
11 matches
Mail list logo
