, 2011 3:57 AM
To: Michael Dillon
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2011 10:37:51 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
It's bad
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2011 10:37:51 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
It's bad that home gateways need replacing
It's not neccessarily bad. There are a lot of older devices
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:59:35AM -0500, Jeff Hartley wrote:
It will certainly be entertaining to see what behaviors the various
CPEs default to on the public-facing side. In the NetGear WNDR3700's
case after upgrading its firmware, options were included for:
Disabled (default)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 15:52, Dorn Hetzel d...@hetzel.org wrote:
p.s. with apologies to any honest marketers. All 2 of you..
What's the difference between a used car salesman and a network equipment
salesman?
The used care salesman knows when he's lying to you :)
The required
In message AANLkTikXoLx1fsimoKx=hntovubwdadnktmwcb-84...@mail.gmail.com, Jeff
Hartley writes:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-me=
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
It will certainly be entertaining to see what behaviors the various
CPEs default to on the public-facing side. In the NetGear WNDR3700's
case after upgrading its firmware, options were included for:
Disabled (default)
In message aanlktiktypauvasesnr0reotakfi_ff5xy5jm-j-w...@mail.gmail.com, Jeff
Hartley writes:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
It will certainly be entertaining to see what behaviors the various
CPEs default to on the public-facing side. =A0In the NetGear
From: Geert Bosch [mailto:bo...@adacore.com]
Basically, it should not have to cost anything extra to set up
new users for IPv6. The same hardware that handles IPv4 today
can be programmed to do IPv6.
That is not the case for a significant number of home gateways
and other consumer
In message 000901cbcb22$3cf978a0$b6ec69e0$@org, Lee Howard writes:
-Original Message-
From: Geert Bosch [mailto:bo...@adacore.com]
Honestly, I can't quite see the big deal for home users. I'm using
an Apple Airport Extreme, and setting it up with a IPv6 tunnel from
$150?
It's bad that home gateways need replacing
It's not neccessarily bad. There are a lot of older devices out there
and technology has progressed a couple of generations since then. That
spells market opportunity for manufacturers of IPv6 gateways,
particularly at the higher end of the market where
In message 8b082d10-a0ea-4012-8656-e60dd7ec7...@adacore.com, Geert Bosch write
s:
On Feb 12, 2011, at 21:03, Lee Howard wrote:
Honestly, I can't quite see the big deal for home users. I'm using
an Apple Airport Extreme, and setting it up with a IPv6 tunnel from
=20
$150? That's a
On Feb 13, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 000901cbcb22$3cf978a0$b6ec69e0$@org, Lee Howard writes:
-Original Message-
From: Geert Bosch [mailto:bo...@adacore.com]
Honestly, I can't quite see the big deal for home users. I'm using
an Apple Airport Extreme,
-Original Message-
From: Geert Bosch [mailto:bo...@adacore.com]
Honestly, I can't quite see the big deal for home users. I'm using
an Apple Airport Extreme, and setting it up with a IPv6 tunnel from
$150? That's a high-powered device compared to most home gateways.
HE was quite
On Feb 12, 2011, at 21:03, Lee Howard wrote:
Honestly, I can't quite see the big deal for home users. I'm using
an Apple Airport Extreme, and setting it up with a IPv6 tunnel from
$150? That's a high-powered device compared to most home gateways.
Sure, but the same thing is possible with a
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
They missed an important point.
Who Will Be
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
Hmm, I recognize a lot of that article. If
- Original Message -
From: Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 9:43:56 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com
They missed an important point.
Who Will Be Impacted: For more consumers, there will be negligible
impact. The ISPs will be handling much of this,” said Leo Vegoda,
a
researcher with ICANN. (via TechNewsWorld). Some technology users
may experience some glitches, such as people
On 2/11/2011 3:31 PM, George Bonser wrote:
IPv6 is foundational to the next-generation Internet, enabling a
range of new services and improved user experiences.
Apparently they see IPv6 as some next-generation Internet thing.
It isn't.
Reread what they wrote. IPv6 is foundational to the
- Original Message -
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 10:31:42 AM
Subject: RE: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
They missed an important point.
Who
On 02/11/2011 10:46 AM, J.D. Falk wrote:
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
Hmm, I
p.s. with apologies to any honest marketers. All 2 of you..
What's the difference between a used car salesman and a network equipment
salesman?
The used care salesman knows when he's lying to you :)
In message 4d55abce.7030...@brightok.net, Jack Bates writes:
On 2/11/2011 3:31 PM, George Bonser wrote:
IPv6 is foundational to the next-generation Internet, enabling a
range of new services and improved user experiences.
Apparently they see IPv6 as some next-generation Internet thing.
On 2/11/2011 6:56 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
They have had a #@!@ decade to add IPv6 support. They shouldn't need
anymore time. Part of the reason we are in this mess is their delay
in delivering products.
Nah. The network side of things probably won't be too bad. Corporate
world will have
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 17:52 -0500, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
p.s. with apologies to any honest marketers. All 2 of you..
What's the difference between a used car salesman and a network equipment
salesman?
The used care salesman knows when he's lying to you :)
And the used car saleman probably
On Feb 11, 2011, at 15:43, Fred Baker wrote:
Anyone that uses a residential router (Linksys, D-Link, Netgear, etc) is
likely to need to upgrade that, most likely by buying a new one. Set-top
boxes are generally IPv4; anyone with a TV is likely to need to upgrade at
least the software.
28 matches
Mail list logo
