On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Chris Woodfield rek...@semihuman.com wrote:
I think this is the point where I get a shovel, a bullwhip and head over to
the horse graveyard that is CAM optimization...
The classic problem with any sort of FIB optimization is that you
can't optimize every figure
My concern is trying to find a router (within our budget) that has room for
growth in the IPv6 routing space. When compared to the live table sizes that
the CIDR report and routeviews show, some can't handle current routing
tables, let alone years of growth. BGP tweaks may keep us going
On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:01 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
My concern is trying to find a router (within our budget) that has room for
growth in the IPv6 routing space. When compared to the live table sizes
that the CIDR report and routeviews show, some can't handle current routing
tables, let
Chris,
With address exhaustion and deaggregation, the table is only going to
get bigger so choosing anything now that can only handle anything
south of 1M routes is not a wise investment.
Several posters have recommended ASR1002 and MX80. I use both of these
platforms in my environment and have
Enger
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size
considerations
Chris,
With address exhaustion and deaggregation, the table is only going to
get bigger so choosing anything now that can only handle anything
south of 1M routes is not a wise investment
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size
considerations
On 09/03/11 12:08, Julien Goodwin wrote:
On 09/03/11 11:57, Chris Enger wrote:
I did look at a Juniper J6350, and the documentation states it can handle
400k routes with 1GB of memory, or 1 million with 2GB
have you looked into juniper networks?
- Reply message -
From: Chris Enger chr...@ci.hillsboro.or.us
Date: Tue, Mar 8, 2011 5:15 pm
Subject: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size considerations
To: 'nanog@nanog.org' nanog@nanog.org
Greetings,
I am researching
On 09/03/11 11:57, Chris Enger wrote:
I did look at a Juniper J6350, and the documentation states it can handle
400k routes with 1GB of memory, or 1 million with 2GB. However it doesn’t
spell out how that is divvyed up between the two based on a profile setting
or some other mechanism.
On 09/03/11 12:08, Julien Goodwin wrote:
On 09/03/11 11:57, Chris Enger wrote:
I did look at a Juniper J6350, and the documentation states it can handle
400k routes with 1GB of memory, or 1 million with 2GB. However it doesn’t
spell out how that is divvyed up between the two based on a
[mailto:na...@studio442.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 5:09 PM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Cc: Chris Enger
Subject: Re: Internet Edge Router replacement - IPv6 route table size
considerations
On 09/03/11 12:08, Julien Goodwin wrote:
On 09/03/11 11:57, Chris Enger wrote:
I did look at a Juniper
10 matches
Mail list logo
