Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-21 Thread Andrey Slastenov
CMM - Cisco Multicast Manager www.cisco.com/go/cmm 2010/7/21 James Hess mysi...@gmail.com On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote: Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol. Looks like

RE: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-21 Thread Brandon Kim
I was wondering what was going on. Kinda tired of seeing my own emails over and over Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:22:14 -0700 From: se...@rollernet.us To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Multicast Network Monitoring On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon Kim wrote: Interesting question, I'd

Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Robert Sager
Curious if anyone has any experience with tools specifically for monitoring multicast. Finds where the trees are, paths they are on, tracks all senders/receivers per group, handles PIM-SM, RPs, MSDP, MDT Tunnels over MPLS VPN, etc. Such as Cisco Multicast Manager, EMC Ionix Multicast Manager, CA

RE: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Brandon Kim
Interesting question, I'd like to know more about this myself. I'm so used to monitoring SNMP-based devices, never really thought about multi-casts and being able to see the pattern/tree Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:59:13 -0400 Subject: Multicast Network Monitoring From: rjsa

Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Athanasios Douitsis
it too has been abandoned. Best Regards, Athanasios Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:59:13 -0400 Subject: Multicast Network Monitoring From: rjsa...@gmail.com To: nanog@nanog.org Curious if anyone has any experience with tools specifically for monitoring multicast. Finds where the trees

RE: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Brandon Kim
on a tool called Muvi http://muvi.man.poznan.pl/You may want to take a look, although I fear it too has been abandoned. Best Regards,Athanasios Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:59:13 -0400 Subject: Multicast Network Monitoring From: rjsa...@gmail.com To: nanog@nanog.org Curious if anyone

Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread John Kristoff
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:59:13 -0400 Robert Sager rjsa...@gmail.com wrote: Curious if anyone has any experience with tools specifically for monitoring multicast. Finds where the trees are, paths they are on, tracks all senders/receivers per group, handles PIM-SM, RPs, MSDP, MDT Tunnels over

Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon Kim wrote: Interesting question, I'd like to know more about this myself. I'm so used to monitoring SNMP-based devices, never really thought about multi-casts and being able to see the pattern/tree Is it just me, or is anyone else receiving multiple

RE: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Jay Mitchell
9 Copies here. The headers seem to show a bit of bouncing around inside cisco.com -Original Message- From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us] Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2010 12:22 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Multicast Network Monitoring On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon

Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Marshall Eubanks
...@rollernet.us] Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2010 12:22 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Multicast Network Monitoring On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon Kim wrote: Interesting question, I'd like to know more about this myself. I'm so used to monitoring SNMP-based devices, never really thought about multi

Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread Antonio Querubin
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote: Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol. Looks like their mmrpf (multicast mail reply path forwarding) is broken ;) Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net

Re: Multicast Network Monitoring

2010-07-20 Thread James Hess
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net wrote: On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote: Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol. Looks like their mmrpf (multicast mail reply path forwarding) is broken ;) Or.. perhaps someone over