On 15/07/11 12:24 AM, Alex Ryu wrote:
> That issue can be resolved by changing email addresses for multiple
> language support by using announce...@example.com,
> anounce...@example.com ?
Yeah, that's how I'd get around it. I think the Document Foundation
had some other issues, like wanting addre
That issue can be resolved by changing email addresses for multiple
language support by using announce...@example.com,
anounce...@example.com ?
Alex
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
> On 13/07/11 11:37 PM, Richard Kulawiec wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:13:10PM +0200,
On 13/07/11 11:37 PM, Richard Kulawiec wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
>> I might have missed some discussion; but why are we moving
>> away from mailman, and what software is in the new system?
>
> Seconded. Mailman is presently the gold standard for mai
Unconfigured bulk_mailer = lots of unsolicited bulk mail
Oh well
--srs
Sent from my iPad
On 13-Jul-2011, at 19:43, James Cloos wrote:
>> "JA" == Jay Ashworth writes:
>
> JA> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Ben Carleton"
>
>>> * The mailing list is stripping out all Received: h
> "JA" == Jay Ashworth writes:
JA> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ben Carleton"
>> * The mailing list is stripping out all Received: headers from prior
>> to the message hitting the listserver
JA> You're the third person to report that, but *I* am seeing incoming
JA> Received heade
Good response Jimmy. I think that peoples tact more than anything is
what is embarrassing about these threads. The complaint is legitimate.
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 07/12/2011 09:05 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
T
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
> I might have missed some discussion; but why are we moving
> away from mailman, and what software is in the new system?
Seconded. Mailman is presently the gold standard for mailing list
management [1], and while a lift-and-drop of
- Original Message -
>
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
> >
> > I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience
> > with the IETF mailing list. It has had ongoing issues with
> > out-of-sequence delivery. Based on the Received headers, it's
> > seems prett
On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
>
> I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience
> with the IETF mailing list. It has had ongoing issues with
> out-of-sequence delivery. Based on the Received headers, it's
> seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal
- Original Message -
>
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
>
> > Looks like parts of the received like are still there, though
> > butchered and mashed in (most likely in a non-RFC compliant
> > manner) with the one added by 'bulk_maler v1.13' (great name for
> > the mail
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
> The tolerance of some of you out there is amazing. You must be PS3 users
> crying because your free game network is down. Maybe we can get a
PS3net users had a right to cry.. because their 'free' game network
is not really free,
and they bought
On 2011/07/12 16:20, Grant Taylor wrote:
Also, subscriptions that were set to no mail delivery are now
delivering mail. Is this expected?
I saw duplicate messages from an account that I had disabled (while
testing NANOG volumes to a portable messaging device and forwarding to
this account) and
On 7/12/11 10:37 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
You seem to be new here.
Since you asked, no, been around alot longer then I care to remember.
bulk_mailer was something used back in the day to workaround
limitations in sendmail for those people operating majordomo (and
those using smail etc). it
On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> Looks like parts of the received like are still there, though butchered and
> mashed in (most likely in a non-RFC compliant manner) with the one added by
> 'bulk_maler v1.13' (great name for the mailer, btw, sets off my spammy sense
> someth
job as one the trainers for the
so called "experts" on this.
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bonomi [mailto:bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 8:14 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
Cc: na...@nanog.org.r-bonomi.com
I
e one that started the
thread called "NANOG List Update - Moving Forward" from Michael K Smith, for
example), you will see that the headers are being stripped...
--bc
-Original Message-
From: "Jay Ashworth"
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:13pm
To: "NANOG"
On 7/12/11 10:13 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Carleton"
* The mailing list is stripping out all Received: headers from prior
to the message hitting the listserver
You're the third person to report that, but *I* am seeing incoming Received
headers in my mes
bonomi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 8:14 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
Cc: na...@nanog.org.r-bonomi.com
In-Reply-To: <1be304a1-0da0-4558-83ad-0e4f08f81...@twincreeks.net>
> Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
> From: Steve Fe
- Original Message -
> From: "Gerry Boudreaux"
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 00:19 , Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> > Mailman is shut down on s0.nanog.org and mail is being routed directly to
> > mail.amsl.com where it is being processed by our new list (etc.) system.
>
> Will the list archi
- Original Message -
> From: "Ben Carleton"
> * The mailing list is stripping out all Received: headers from prior
> to the message hitting the listserver
You're the third person to report that, but *I* am seeing incoming Received
headers in my messages here -- yours, for example, has th
Cc: na...@nanog.org.r-bonomi.com
In-Reply-To: <1be304a1-0da0-4558-83ad-0e4f08f81...@twincreeks.net>
> Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
> From: Steve Feldman
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:00:51 -0700
>
> We're aware of the spam problem and have ou
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to
>>> stay in
>> Hooray for testing in production.
>
> we are not dealing with stupid or inexperienced people here. i assume
> they tested.
>
> but, like our beloved vendors, th
>> Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to
>> stay in
> Hooray for testing in production.
we are not dealing with stupid or inexperienced people here. i assume
they tested.
but, like our beloved vendors, they also have a hard time reproducing
the real network in the lab
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
wrote:
> Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to stay in
Hooray for testing in production.
-cjp
On Jul 12, 2011, at 00:19 , Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Mailman is shut down on s0.nanog.org and mail is being routed directly to
> mail.amsl.com where it is being processed by our new list (etc.) system.
Will the list archives migrate? What about future list archives?
Thanks
G
al Message-
From: "Steve Feldman"
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:00am
To: deles...@gmail.com
Cc: "NANOG list"
Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
We're aware of the spam problem and have our top people working on it.
Reports of other lingering issues f
On 07/12/11 03:21, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers.
Also, subscriptions that were set to no mail delivery are now delivering
mail. Is this expected?
Grant. . . .
- Original Message -
> The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the
> headers.
Also, a statement would be nice as to what header definitely *will* be in place
that we can filter on. At the moment, I'm assuming 'List-ID', but I'm not sure
if that header or its conten
On 2011-07-12 07:19, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
I miss proper List-Id headers for identifying and filtering
the list easily.
I might have missed some discussion; but why are we moving
away from mailman, and what software is in the
On 2011-07-12 07:19, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
I miss proper List-Id headers for identifying and filtering
the list easily.
I might have missed some discussion; but why are we moving
away from mailman, and what software is in the
We're aware of the spam problem and have our top people working on it.
Reports of other lingering issues from the change would be appreciated, though.
Thanks,
Steve
On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:03 AM, jim deleskie wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Pitcock
> wrote:
>> On Tu
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
>
> > If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
>
> The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers.
I'll offer an evenhanded comment in that it's frustrating that the
headers used have changed, since
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers.
Also, the headers now no longer include the origin of mess
Hi
Also seeing a gross amount of spam from list
and my "digest" setting has been lost apparently.
Sigh
C
Just want to re-confirm. I've got only 4 in my spam. Is it google spam who
is not putting it in SPAM folder?
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST)
> Tim Franklin wrote:
>
> > > Thankfully, the current test
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers.
This took a very long time to get delivered (2h20 minutes)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>> Thankfully, the current test has been a success.
>
> Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other anti-spam?
>
> I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to nanog@nanog.org :(
>
> Regards,
> Tim.
>
Same h
deleskie [mailto:deles...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 July 2011 13:03
To: neno...@systeminplace.net
Cc: t...@pelican.org; NANOG list
Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
+1
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST) Tim Franklin
>
+1
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Pitcock
wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST)
> Tim Franklin wrote:
>
>> > Thankfully, the current test has been a success.
>>
>> Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other
>> anti-spam?
>>
>> I've got a sudden influ
> If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
we haz spam!
randy
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST)
Tim Franklin wrote:
> > Thankfully, the current test has been a success.
>
> Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other
> anti-spam?
>
> I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to
> nanog@nanog.org :(
>
Ditto. G
> Thankfully, the current test has been a success.
Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other anti-spam?
I've got a sudden influx this morning of spam addressed to nanog@nanog.org :(
Regards,
Tim.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
If you have any questions or concerns please let me know.
The new posts do not have list (un)subscribe information in the headers.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
Hello All:
Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to stay in
the present setup through tomorrow morning at approximately 11:00 AM PDT
(GMT -7). Below is a brief description of the present state and the
changes that will be made tomorrow.
Present State
Mai
44 matches
Mail list logo
