On 8/2/22 8:46 PM, Chris Adams via NANOG wrote:
> Once upon a time, Bryan Fields said:
>> The list is configured to wrap anyone posting from a domain with a with a
>> DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy (dmarc_moderation_action). If you don't have
>> this set on your domain, the list will not wrap
Once upon a time, Bryan Fields said:
> The list is configured to wrap anyone posting from a domain with a with a
> DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy (dmarc_moderation_action). If you don't have
> this set on your domain, the list will not wrap your message (which is the
> correct behavior as it
On 8/2/22 1:16 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as
> if one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly
> rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
>
> Not sure who manages it anymore these
It appears that Jared Mauch said:
>Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as
>if one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our
>messages are possibly rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
I checked with Jared and he seems to misunderstand
> On Aug 2, 2022, at 4:31 PM, John Levine via NANOG wrote:
>
> It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG said:
>>
>> On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote:
>>> It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter
>>> being Jared's situation)
>
> I don't
It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG said:
>
>On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote:
>> It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter
>> being Jared's situation)
I don't understand Jared's concern. His DMARC policy, like mine, is p=none
which tells
On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote:
On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 11:24 -0700, Michael Thomas via NANOG wrote:
On 8/2/22 11:18 AM, Chris Adams via NANOG wrote:
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
Once upon a time, Jared Mauch said:
Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC
On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 11:24 -0700, Michael Thomas via NANOG wrote:
> On 8/2/22 11:18 AM, Chris Adams via NANOG wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> > > Once upon a time, Jared Mauch said:
> > > > Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s
> > > > problematic as if
On 8/2/22 11:18 AM, Chris Adams via NANOG wrote:
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
Once upon a time, Jared Mauch said:
Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as if
one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly
rejected, and
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> Once upon a time, Jared Mauch said:
> > Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic
> > as if one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are
> > possibly rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
Once upon a time, Jared Mauch said:
> Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as
> if one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly
> rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
The list is doing the DMARC handling (From
Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as if
one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly
rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
Not sure who manages it anymore these days.
- Jared
12 matches
Mail list logo
