[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from
RIPE to start
testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and build a
dual stack network so that when the time comes, just switch
on IPv6 BGP
neighbors and update the DNS.
But at almost 10.000
We have also started offering residential Internet to those
living on campus, which has been very popular (no suprise.)
You've started your own ISP. ISP's get a /32 from ARIN.
Case closed.
In fact, you are better off treating your non-ISP networks
as a customer of your ISP and assigning a
On 2008-11-19, at 09:25, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have also started offering residential Internet to those living
on campus, which has been very popular (no suprise.)
You've started your own ISP. ISP's get a /32 from ARIN.
Case closed.
In fact, you are better off
Joe Abley wrote:
But surely he's not an end-user. He's an ISP, which means he's
(potentially) an LIR.
My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from RIPE to start
testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and build a
dual stack network so that when the time
On 19 nov 2008, at 9:27, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from RIPE to
start testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and
build a dual stack network so that when the time comes, just switch
on IPv6 BGP neighbors and update the
My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from
RIPE to start
testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and build a
dual stack network so that when the time comes, just switch
on IPv6 BGP
neighbors and update the DNS.
But at almost 10.000 EUR per year it's
On 14 nov 2008, at 14:55, Fred Baker wrote:
Before we get too deeply exercised, let Margaret and I huddle on it.
The issue you raised can be trivially solved by adding the checksum
offset to a different 16 bits in the address, such as bits 96..127.
Being checksum-equivalent is important so
On 19/11/2008 4:27, Eugeniu Patrascu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
My gripe was that I wanted to get an IPv6 allocation from RIPE to start
testing how IPv6 would fit in the company that I work for and build a
dual stack network so that when the time comes, just switch on IPv6 BGP
neighbors
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
residential subscribers could be issued with a /56
instead of the normal /48 assignment. This was done
so that ISPs
On 11/18/2008 at 11:03 AM, Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
residential subscribers could be issued with a /56
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Crist Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 11/18/2008 at 11:03 AM, Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not long ago, ARIN changed
Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
residential subscribers could be issued with a /56
instead of the normal /48 assignment. This was done
so that ISPs with large numbers of subscriber sites
would not exhaust their /32 (or larger) allocations
too soon. Since these ISPs are allowed
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not long ago, ARIN changed the IPv6 policy so that
residential subscribers could be issued with a /56
instead of the normal /48 assignment. This was done
so that ISPs with large numbers of subscriber sites
would not exhaust their /32 (or larger)
Before we get too deeply exercised, let Margaret and I huddle on it.
The issue you raised can be trivially solved by adding the checksum
offset to a different 16 bits in the address, such as bits 96..127. In
fact, the only reason to care which bits it is added to is to handle
multi-DMZ
14 matches
Mail list logo
