David Conrad wrote:
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as
opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they
indicated they'd do prior to IANA
FWIW - I don't believe the two arguments are in opposition/conflict ... But
totally agree with your end result of /56s and /48s, with add'l bits held
in reserve ...
/TJ
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
[ I normally don't say this, but please reply to the
Doug Barton wrote:
[ I normally don't say this, but please reply to the list only, thanks.
]
I've been a member of the let's not assume the IPv6 space is
infinite school from day 1, even though I feel like I have a pretty
solid grasp of the math. Others have alluded to some of the reasons
Tony Hain wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
In the following I'm assuming that you're familiar with the fact that
staying on the 4-byte boundaries makes sense because it makes reverse
DNS delegation easier. It also makes the math easier.
I assume you meant 4-bit. ;)
Grrr, I hate when I do that.
On 7/10/2009, at 6:10 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
Tony Hain wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
In the following I'm assuming that you're familiar with the fact
that
staying on the 4-byte boundaries makes sense because it makes
reverse
DNS delegation easier. It also makes the math easier.
I assume
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as
opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they
indicated they'd do prior to IANA allocating the /12s, you
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:17 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Nathan Ward wrote:
My understanding is that the RIRs are doing sparse allocation, as
opposed to reserving a few bits. I could be wrong.
Last I heard, with the exception of APNIC and contrary to what they
indicated
[ I normally don't say this, but please reply to the list only, thanks. ]
I've been a member of the let's not assume the IPv6 space is
infinite school from day 1, even though I feel like I have a pretty
solid grasp of the math. Others have alluded to some of the reasons
why I have concerns about
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
As a practical matter we're stuck with /64 as the smallest possible
network we can reliably assign. A /60 contains 16 /64s, which
personally I think is more than enough for a residential customer,
even taking a long view
9 matches
Mail list logo
