Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings

2017-12-08 Thread Alexander Azimov
Job, thank you for the intro. :) Dear Mike, the radar project is operating its own BGP collector system which improves when we have more sessions and loses data, when BGP sessions are going down. While it's overall amount is constantly growing (it reached 400 a month ago), there are sessions that

Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings

2017-12-06 Thread Alexander Lyamin
Yep. We're the ones to blame. There is known bug. Give us couple more days. Would normally take few hours to fix, but we have Peering Forum on hands. P.S. There is CONTACT US button on page to report bugs, way more reliable way to submit bugs and additional thanks to Job for pointing me

Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings

2017-12-06 Thread Job Snijders
On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 at 15:42, Mike Hammett wrote: > I haven't brought it up with them, no. I didn't think it was a mass issue > until last night. I wanted to check with other users before I went to them. > Maybe I should have done the opposite. Yes, you should’ve. The Qrator

Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings

2017-12-06 Thread Mike Hammett
- Original Message - From: "Yang Yu" <yang.yu.l...@gmail.com> To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 1:11:48 AM Subject: Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings Ha

Re: Qrator Radar - Peerings

2017-12-05 Thread Yang Yu
Have you received a response from qrator? My guess is that they dropped a BGP collector session that was advertising garbage (modifying AS path to make non-connected ASNs appear connected). >most ASNs left permanently on at 2017-03-11 21:00:00 were never connected

Qrator Radar - Peerings

2017-12-05 Thread Mike Hammett
Does anyone use this site much? Has something happened to reduce their visibility? I've noticed multiple networks that had massive drops in peerings on or around March 11, 2017. AS5650 went from 66 to 12. AS53828 went from 436 to 19. PCH's AS3856 looking glass still reports adjacencies to