Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of LF OD
Sent: Saturday, 6 May 2017 4:56 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Question about experiences with BGP remote-AS
We have a number of small routers in co-lo sites that peer with B2B
partners. As more of our partners move to cloud
On Fri, May 5, 2017, at 18:55, LF OD wrote:
> of our existing ASNs and peerings. As it turns out, there are many
> routers that can do VRFs but you cannot put a unique ASN on each VRF so
> replicating the old environment isn't quite that straightforward. The BGP
> remote-as looks to be a possible
Neighbor x.x.x.x local-as {whateverasn} no-prepend replace-as
On Friday, May 5, 2017, LF OD wrote:
> We have a number of small routers in co-lo sites that peer with B2B
> partners. As more of our partners move to cloud, we are considering a
> consolidation effort and putting all of our peering
We have a number of small routers in co-lo sites that peer with B2B partners.
As more of our partners move to cloud, we are considering a consolidation
effort and putting all of our peering routers in a cloud exchange site on a
single HA pair of routers. Now, each existing B2B peering router us
4 matches
Mail list logo
