Colton,
Arris has plans to release a remote PHY+MAC box but I don't think they have
released anything but their plans. John Chapman said last year at SCTE
that Cisco was going down the remote PHY only path because they think that
will be the most cost effective way for large MSOs to deploy MHAv2.
Scott,
I was able to find the Huawie solution:
http://www.huawei.com/ucmf/groups/public/documents/webasset/hw_415387.pdf
Looks like its 32x4 capable today, and software upgradeable to DOCSIS 3.1
which is nice. Appears to also have a 10G uplink port on it. Seems like the
best solution tech spec wis
Colton,
Huawai has one, but I can't find the product page on their site off hand.
Here's one from Sumavision:
http://en.sumavision.com/product.asp?pageID=28&ID=712
Harmonic's small form factor CMTS is remote PHY+MAC (at least the strand
mounted version is) but keep in mind that they've been prim
Yes, I looked at CASA, but their small unit is the C1G, which is an 8x8 max
DOCSIS 3.0 unit. Plus they want a high price point, almost quadruple what a
16X4 Pico Digital or Harmonic's unit cost. Not seeing the value or specs
there to justify it.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Steven Shalita wrot
Scott,
Have any idea which exact vendors and model numbers are within this price
range? So far I have just found mini CMTS systems like the Pico and
Harmonic's. Both of these are a 16x4 configuration, but no mention of
remote MAC+PHY nor DOSIS 3.1. Then their is Huawei's solution, but still I
thin
Richard,
Thanks for the information on these. Do you mind me asking what is a
ballpark for these devices? From what I have read/heard, the Huawei D-CMTS
was a 16x4 unit software upgradeable to 32x4 I thought. Is the one you have
software upgradeable to 32x4? Are these DOCSIS 3.1 capable.
Better y
I'm in the middle of pulling some Cisco 7246VXR-UBR's (antiques) and
replacing them with the Huawei D-CMTS devices. From what I understand of
your needs, the Huawei devices will do what you are looking for. We are
running 8x4, but can upgrade the licenses to 24x4 if we need the bandwidth,
althoug
ity along the Arris line, skip the C4 and go straight to
> the E6000.
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Corbe
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:18 AM
> To: Colton Conor
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject
If you need density along the Arris line, skip the C4 and go straight to the
E6000.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Corbe
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:18 AM
To: Colton Conor
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Cable Operator List
Hey
he CMTS.
> > >
> > > Graham Johnston
> > > Network Planner
> > > Westman Communications Group
> > > 204.717.2829
> > > johnst...@westmancom.com
> > > think green; don't print this email.
> > >
> > >
> > >
Colton,
D3.1 gear is just coming online right now. If you're going to go with the
smaller PHY+MAC approach I'd just make sure the company has plans to update
their boxes to 3.1 in a decent (your judgement) amount of time. Don't
expect any 3.0 box to be software upgradeable to 3.1, the hardware i
think green; don't print this email.
From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 9:44 AM
To: Graham Johnston
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Cable Operator List
Graham,
What is DSG? Yes, I am really looking for a CMTS to perform layer 2 just as our
DSLAMs and GP
Is a remote MAC+PHY the same thing as a Distributed Converged Cable Access
Platform (D-CCAP) solution like Huawei is pushing? Is DOCSIS 3.1 even out,
or am I looking for something that does not exist yet?
Are these remote MAC+PHY devices in the under 10K price range that these
smaller all in one C
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> Yes, we are in the USA. So based on everyones recommendations, I am going
> to stay far away from EURODOCSIS. I was told be a vendor that Arris and
> other USA FCC certified cable modems could easily be flashed to EURODOCIS
> mode, so I did no
Yes, we are in the USA. So based on everyones recommendations, I am going
to stay far away from EURODOCSIS. I was told be a vendor that Arris and
other USA FCC certified cable modems could easily be flashed to EURODOCIS
mode, so I did not think the CPE side was that big of a deal (is that even
true
Nick,
Absolutely, if your plant is in Europe or one of the other areas (lots of
Africa and the middle East is like that) that adopted EuroDOCSIS I'd agree
wholeheartedly. I didn't see Colton say where they're located, but all
North America is the US flavor so that's what I assume on NANOG.
That
Scott Helms wrote:
> That very small upside for an extreme downside.Trying to hire someone
> to work on your system with Euro channelization, not to mention buying
> amplifiers and passives is a huge PITA.
... if your plant is in the US.
> I have customers in Europe who
> decided to do US DOCSIS
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:26:14 +, Nick Hilliard said:
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> > I can create a catv or similar list easily. good name
> > suggestions welcome.
>
> "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation
> and naming things".
They're only hard because all *othe
Hi,
On 2 February 2016 at 15:47, Colton Conor wrote:
> I would honestly perfer something that was hardened for outdoor use. Think
> garden style apartments. What is the best for something like that?
It depends where you are going to be deploying these things, northern
New York state? Arizona
Nick,
That very small upside for an extreme downside. Trying to hire someone to
work on your system with Euro channelization, not to mention buying
amplifiers and passives is a huge PITA. I have customers in Europe who
decided to do US DOCSIS and they universally wish they had used the local
"fl
on, as well as others. Many of the C-DOCSIS CMTSs seem either
>> only
>> > support, or are more often meant to support layer 2 operations where
>>the
>> > routing happens upstream from the CMTS.
>> >
>> > Graham Johnston
>> > Network Planner
&
Scott Helms wrote:
> My 2 cents, buy CMTS/CCAP gear that's upgradeable to D3.1, ie CBR8, E6000,
> or the big Casa unit, for the time being shoot for 24 channel downstream
> bonding groups (24 * ~37mbps - overhead) which yields about 740 mbps
> usable.
the good thing about eurodocsis is that it giv
In-line below.
-Daniel
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the wealth of information. What kind of speeds are you offering?
> How many customers are you putting on one of these boxes? What modems are you
> using?
We’re using Arris modems because we
> > johnst...@westmancom.com
> > think green; don't print this email.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:00 AM
> > To: Danie
The biggest reason to not do EuroDOCSIS is logistics and dealing with
various TAC organizations versus a pretty small increase in per channel
performance (but not per hertz). I'd pretty strongly recommend against it,
just because you're going to run into issues ranging from buying modems, to
deali
Daniel,
Thanks for the wealth of information. What kind of speeds are you offering?
How many customers are you putting on one of these boxes? What modems are
you using?
I would honestly perfer something that was hardened for outdoor use. Think
garden style apartments. What is the best for somethi
; Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:00 AM
> To: Daniel Corbe
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Cable Operator List
>
> Well, maybe NANOG's not a bad place for this post then! I would like to
> know more about the data-only side of CMTS systems, and who the main
> vendors are.
&g
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:26:14PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> > I can create a catv or similar list easily. good name
> > suggestions welcome.
>
> "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation
> and naming things".
https://xkcd.com/910/
> do
Jared Mauch wrote:
> I can create a catv or similar list easily. good name
> suggestions welcome.
"There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation
and naming things".
docsis-nsp?
Nick
Hey Colton,
We’re using small 16 channel CMTS systems for residential MDUs and colocating
them directly on premise inside of wiring closets and then connecting them by
metro ethernet. We’ve had great successes so far with this model.
There’s lots of CMTS vendors.
There’s tons of used Motorol
717.2829
johnst...@westmancom.com
think green; don't print this email.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:00 AM
To: Daniel Corbe
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Cable Operator List
Well, maybe NANOG's not a bad
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 08:53:36AM -0500, Benjamin Hatton wrote:
> The Cable TV List (http://cabletvlist.com/) doesn't get much traffic, but
> it does have some quality people on it that can answer most CATV
> questions. It is heavily weighted on the TV side, so most things are
> related to transp
Those that are SCTE members have access to the SCTE mailing list. Like the
comments about the CableTV list, it is often focused on plant/transport/RF more
than Docsis but there are good DOCSIS knowledgeable people on the list too that
answer questions.
Graham Johnston
Network Planner
Westman C
Well, maybe NANOG's not a bad place for this post then! I would like to
know more about the data-only side of CMTS systems, and who the main
vendors are.
We have MDU properties where there is either old inside CAT3 phone wire, or
coaxial cable. We have looked and are very familiar with the multipl
day, February 2, 2016 8:53:36 AM
Subject: Re: Cable Operator List
The Cable TV List (http://cabletvlist.com/) doesn't get much traffic, but
it does have some quality people on it that can answer most CATV
questions. It is heavily weighted on the TV side, so most things are
related to trans
The Cable TV List (http://cabletvlist.com/) doesn't get much traffic, but
it does have some quality people on it that can answer most CATV
questions. It is heavily weighted on the TV side, so most things are
related to transport gear, IRDs, and distribution equipment. I am unaware
of any DOCSIS s
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated for cable/MSO type
> operators?
>
I'm curious about this too.
I’m not a cable operator (in that I haven’t successfully registered for a cable
franchise yet) but I do operate a docsis network
37 matches
Mail list logo
