On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Richard Bennett rich...@bennett.com wrote:
The FCC is structured in such a way that the chairman calls all the shots on
policy matters. In this instance, the former chairman, Kevin Martin, was
responsible for the Comcast order but the current chairman, Julius
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Paul WALL pauldotw...@gmail.com wrote:
It should probably be noted, for purpose of establishing bias, that
Richard is a Washington lobbyist, hired to represent Comcast on
regulatory matters. What he views as overstepping legal bounds,
others may view as
One of the things I like about e-mail lists is learning things about
myself that I never knew before, especially regarding my occupation. For
the last 9 months or so I've been working part-time with a Washington
think tank in an analyst capacity, not as a lobbyist, and not on the
Comcast
On 4/12/10 2:42 PM, Richard Bennett wrote:
... the guy who wrote the first IEEE 802 standard for
Ethernet over twisted pair ...
I'm certain that's who you are. Hell, what I do for CORE means I'm a
ICANN lobbyist when I'm not writing code, and I'd prefer to be the guy
who wrote XPG/1 and XPG/4.2
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Richard Bennett rich...@bennett.com wrote:
One of the things I like about e-mail lists is learning things about myself
that I never knew before, especially regarding my occupation. For the last 9
months or so I've been working part-time with a Washington think
On Apr 12, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Paul WALL wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Richard Bennett rich...@bennett.com wrote:
One of the things I like about e-mail lists is learning things about myself
that I never knew before, especially regarding my occupation. For the last 9
months or so I've
You're speculating that ITIF gets funding from Comcast, and therefore
guessing I'm singing Comcast's song. But you don't know whether Comcast
actually is an ITIF sponsor, just as you don't know whether Google,
Intel, and Microsoft are ITIF sponsors. And then you're speculating
again
On Apr 12, 2010, at 1:05 PM, Richard Bennett wrote:
You're speculating that ITIF gets funding from Comcast, and therefore
If only the ITIF released information about their funding sources.
So, does Comcast contribute funds or otherwise sponsor ITIF?
Does Google, Intel, or Microsoft?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Richard Bennett rich...@bennett.comwrote:
One of the things I like about e-mail lists is learning things about myself
that I never knew before, especially regarding my occupation. For the last 9
months or so I've been working part-time with a Washington think
Thanks for pointing that out.
RB
On 4/12/2010 2:06 PM, Stonix Farstone wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Richard Bennett
[1]rich...@bennett.com wrote:
One of the things I like about e-mail lists is learning things about
myself that I never knew before, especially
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
I would characterize the US as a first rate military and economic
power, but a third rate place to live.
What are the net emigration rates by country?
What are the net medical tourism rates by country?
What are the net disaster charity rates by
Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
I would characterize the US as a first rate military and economic
power, but a third rate place to live.
What are the net emigration rates by country?
What are the net medical tourism rates by country?
What are the net
On 4/10/2010 09:19, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
Please, let's keep this off the NANOG list! I am already on a
politically oriented forum.
Got it. It is OK to make accusations, but not OK to challenge them.
My apologies.
--
Yawn.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
wrote:
On 4/10/2010 09:19, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
Please, let's keep this off the NANOG list! I am already on a
politically
On Apr 9, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
I believe you are doing a disservice to the FCC by making these inflammatory
statements.
And here I thought I was defending them for being different better than the
last group.
The point is, joe asked about the FCC that made a ruling. The
The FCC is structured in such a way that the chairman calls all the
shots on policy matters. In this instance, the former chairman, Kevin
Martin, was responsible for the Comcast order but the current chairman,
Julius Genachowski, had to defend it in court. Some wags insist that the
defense was
. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: FCC dealt major blow in net neutrality ruling favoring Comcast
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast
Seems on-topic, even though policy related.
known that the District Court is dominated by anti-regulatory
judges.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Holstein [mailto:michael.holst...@csuohio.edu]
Sent: Tue 4/6/2010 7:40 PM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: FCC dealt major blow in net neutrality ruling
On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
One thing which would significantly help this argument for or against Network
Neutrality is defining exactly what it is.
The FCC has a definition of sorts, in terms of its six principles. Page three
of
: Tue 4/6/2010 7:40 PM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: FCC dealt major blow in net neutrality ruling favoring Comcast
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast
Seems on-topic, even though
On Apr 9, 2010, at 6:51 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Apr 9, 2010, at 5:22 PM, joe mcguckin wrote:
Let me see if I understand this correctly.
People are defending the FCC?
The same FCC that ruled that any data service over 200Kbits was broadband,
not Information Service and thus
On 4/9/2010 16:22, joe mcguckin wrote:
Let me see if I understand this correctly.
People are defending the FCC?
After looking at who they elect, why does that surprise?
The same FCC that ruled that any data service over 200Kbits was broadband,
not Information Service and thus came under
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 11:30:16 -0400
Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast
Seems on-topic, even though policy related.
It seems to me that Net Neutrality has been
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 08:21, Mark Smith
na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org wrote:
snip
So, there's the problem. According to the above, I'm both for, and
against, Network Neutrality.
One thing which would significantly help this argument for or against
Network
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.com wrote:
They are now using the phrase Open
Internetworking to describe their stance on the issue.
How very sensible of ISOC.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/90747-fcc-dealt-major-blow-in-net-neutrality-ruling-favoring-comcast
Seems on-topic, even though policy related.
Between that and the ACTA foolishness .. seems to be a good time to get
into the VPN business.
/rant
Michael Holstein
26 matches
Mail list logo
