RE: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-26 Thread Jason Sherron
Not a personal experience or recommend but I've seen Pinnacle used for this 
purpose.

TFA http://www.pinnsoft.com/services/operations-management.html

Infrastructure Manager allows you to track every element of your communications 
infrastructure, from the outside and inside cable plant to the port assignment 
and availability of every network provisioning device.
Just as important, Infrastructure Manager ensures that all records are 
immediately updated whether they are modified from inside or outside the 
service order and incident management process. By maintaining a single, central 
repository of all documentation, you'll be able to:

Establish a centralized framework for documenting your entire infrastructure
Eliminate data corruption and reduce the resources required to synchronize 
disparate records
Provide a unified real-time perspective on the status of all communication 
records
Facilitate proactive availability management for all ports and cable plant 
components
Enable cost-effective capacity management
Rationalize audits of your communications infrastructure
Automate updates and prevent corruption



-Original Message-
From: vijay gill [mailto:vg...@vijaygill.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 10:22 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things like 
riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store, CLR/DLR, 
x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work orders, 
modeling, drawdown levels, etc.



On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:

 What software solution do people use for inventory management for 
 things like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology 
 store, CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
 Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work 
 orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.

 /vijay







Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-25 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message -
 From: Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com


 On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:21 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com
 wrote:
  Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
  What software solution do people use for inventory management for
  things
  like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology
  store,
  CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
  Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
  orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.
 
 isn't it odd/lame that in many cases the answer to this is 'build your
 own' ?

In fact, I don't think it's all that odd.  Ontology recapitulates phylology,
as they say, and *all* carriers are sui generis these days, excepting
possibly what's left of the RBOCs.

So it's probably not all that surprising that there's no template to fit
them into; the software has to be bolted on around the systems, rather than
otherwise.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth  Baylink   j...@baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think   RFC 2100
Ashworth  Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA   #natog  +1 727 647 1274



Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-25 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 5/21/13, Siegel, David david.sie...@level3.com wrote:
 Off the shelf stuff?  There are lots of options, but it seems like the
 general opinion of the IT groups I've worked with is that it's just as much
 work to customize and integrate them as it is to write from scratch so we
 tend to get further way from COTS all the time.

Unless the requirement is quite trivial,  or the usage quite small..
I would question 'write everything from scratch' -- now  custom code
for integrations makes sense;   it doesn't make sense for every
company to become a software company though and custom code all the
bits of their systems,  instead of  customizing and reusing proven
code.

A solution implemented with mature OTS components doing all the heavy
lifting  may be more robust, if good choices were made.   Customizing
and integrating OTS components may be hard;  once you do, you worry
only about maintaining customizations and integrations.   Chances are
you get vendor support and well-tested software. :)

That is, if the integrations/customizations made are supported ones,
available through configuration of the software.

With totally custom coded software, the org bears an ongoing burden of
software reliability testing,  for all the custom components.When
one finds custom software cheaper   than an OTS solution...  one
should probably  ask...was   ongoing testing,  support,
updates/security patches, and maintenance included?

In other words... did the IT group just count the Initial cost to
implement, or did they actually figure out a TCO,including
changes to the custom software later required to solve scalability
issues?

The answer in some cases may be to figure out what products might fit
the need/requirement in the most general sense, and find a consulting
group  adept with whichever products,  rather than a local IT group.
:)


I am sure there are plenty of inventory management and accounting type
products out in the world, able to be adapted  for the unique
requirements of inventorying different kinds of things.

Chop up the problem sufficiently  into bite-sized pieces,  and  I
believe  there  are  bound to be existing OTS options more useful than
a spreadsheet.

--
-JH



RE: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-21 Thread Siegel, David
Off the shelf stuff?  There are lots of options, but it seems like the general 
opinion of the IT groups I've worked with is that it's just as much work to 
customize and integrate them as it is to write from scratch so we tend to get 
further way from COTS all the time.

You should take a look at Metasolv (now part of Oracle, I believe).  We used it 
in one of our PL regions for some regional products for over a decade and I 
was always impressed by how quickly they could roll out new workflows and 
products in it since much of the customization work could be done by a business 
process architect rather than having to be coded by a developer.

We've also used Granite, which is from Telcordia, but I don't have enough 
direct or indirect experience to have an opinion on whether or not it's any 
good.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: vijay gill [mailto:vg...@vijaygill.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:22 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things like 
riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store, CLR/DLR, 
x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work orders, 
modeling, drawdown levels, etc.



On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:

 What software solution do people use for inventory management for 
 things like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology 
 store, CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
 Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work 
 orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.

 /vijay







Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-21 Thread Warren Bailey
Beware of Metasolv license costs..

Beware of Metasolv in general.



On 5/21/13 10:28 AM, Siegel, David david.sie...@level3.com wrote:

Off the shelf stuff?  There are lots of options, but it seems like the
general opinion of the IT groups I've worked with is that it's just as
much work to customize and integrate them as it is to write from scratch
so we tend to get further way from COTS all the time.

You should take a look at Metasolv (now part of Oracle, I believe).  We
used it in one of our PL regions for some regional products for over a
decade and I was always impressed by how quickly they could roll out new
workflows and products in it since much of the customization work could
be done by a business process architect rather than having to be coded by
a developer.

We've also used Granite, which is from Telcordia, but I don't have enough
direct or indirect experience to have an opinion on whether or not it's
any good.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: vijay gill [mailto:vg...@vijaygill.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 11:22 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.



On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:

 What software solution do people use for inventory management for
 things like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology
 store, CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
 Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
 orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.

 /vijay









Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-20 Thread Justin M. Streiner

On Sun, 19 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:21 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:

Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.


isn't it odd/lame that in many cases the answer to this is 'build your own' ?


I remember looking several years ago at a commercial fiber plant 
management application called Mapcom.  It looked pretty good, but it was 
pricey, and no one wanted to spend the money on it.  So... fast-forward to 
2013 and we're still using spreadsheets :(


I haven't looked lately to see what's out there, but I'd imagine there 
*has* to be something.


I can understand why many telcos ended up building their own systems, 
because many of them use(d) different or home-grown provisioning/billing/plant 
management/trouble ticketing systems, and different back-end systems in 
general, making a one-size-fits-all solution tough to do.


jms



Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-20 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:

 I haven't looked lately to see what's out there, but I'd imagine there *has*
 to be something.

I bet this is a market/cost thing... there are ~100 people who want
this? it's going to take a few million in SWE resources to build, and
probably recovery of that expense is going to be difficult :(

 I can understand why many telcos ended up building their own systems,
 because many of them use(d) different or home-grown
 provisioning/billing/plant management/trouble ticketing systems, and
 different back-end systems in general, making a one-size-fits-all solution
 tough to do.

this MOSTLY gets to the ins/outs formats, right? 'billing system at
$TELCO requires CSV output' (or something) and telco folk don't always
like to think about 'standards'.



Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-20 Thread Justin M. Streiner

On Mon, 20 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:


I haven't looked lately to see what's out there, but I'd imagine there *has*
to be something.


I bet this is a market/cost thing... there are ~100 people who want
this? it's going to take a few million in SWE resources to build, and
probably recovery of that expense is going to be difficult :(


True, and would explain why the systems I've seen tend to be very 
expensive.


I have taken a look at netdot from UOregon, and it looks like it has lots 
of nice features and an active development community.  The main thing 
there is I need to really sit down and see how painful modifying the 
default DB schema will be to capture some of the fiber plant data I need, 
and preventing that all from getting blown away by the next cycle of 
software upgrades.  Tying it into some other back-end systems we already 
have is another challenge that I really haven't had time to dig into yet.



I can understand why many telcos ended up building their own systems,
because many of them use(d) different or home-grown
provisioning/billing/plant management/trouble ticketing systems, and
different back-end systems in general, making a one-size-fits-all solution
tough to do.


this MOSTLY gets to the ins/outs formats, right? 'billing system at
$TELCO requires CSV output' (or something) and telco folk don't always
like to think about 'standards'.


That, and there can belots of general compatibility issues.  Something 
like:


The provisioning system is running on an old VAX mainframe, and $PROGRAM 
expects CSV with CR-LF, rather than just CR, but the billing system is 
built on a DB2 database on an IBM mainframe and doesn't know how to 
output the data in an acceptable format.  A lot of it is probably 
centered around software engineering/DBA tasks, often requiring people 
with lots of institutional/legacy knowledge to get the appropriate pieces 
talking together correctly.  In some cases, those people are no longer 
around, and consultants with the right skills (and often a pretty hefty 
hourly rate) need to be brought in.


I would imagine that's why some of the telcos that went on acquision 
binges during the dot-com boom (coughcoughworldcom ;) ) never fully 
integrated the back-end systems of those acquired telcos into their own, 
even though it does/did make like more painful for their customers and 
their own ops people.  Example: Oh wait... that's an MFS circuit.  I 
need to get into a different system to look at that...


jms



Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-20 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 5/20/13, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
 I remember looking several years ago at a commercial fiber plant
 management application called Mapcom.  It looked pretty good, but it was
 pricey, and no one wanted to spend the money on it.  So... fast-forward to
 2013 and we're still using spreadsheets :(
[snip]

See, this is a problem   standard  spreadsheet programs are such a
great competitor.

How can you possibly justify the time and expense of developing
software, if spreadsheet programs always wins against your product,
because of its low price,   so that there is no net income  that is
feasible to be made  in that venture?

Maybe the answer is,  someone did make the program...  it's just
Excel,  and developing more detailed custom software could be a good
idea if it provides greater utility than the applicable cost of
development --  once you have it though,   maybe  you don't want to
sell it because it provides a competitive edge,  and noone would be
willing to pay enough  for product and support anyways  :)

--
-JH



Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-19 Thread vijay gill
Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.



On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:

 What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
 like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
 CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
 Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
 orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.

 /vijay






Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2013-05-19 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:21 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:
 Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
 What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
 like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
 CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
 Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work
 orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.

isn't it odd/lame that in many cases the answer to this is 'build your own' ?



Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2008-04-05 Thread Greg VILLAIN


On Apr 4, 2008, at 11:16 PM, vijay gill wrote:
What software solution do people use for inventory management for  
things like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical  
topology store, CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work  
orders, modeling, drawdown levels, etc.


/vijay


Seen loads of the running, (Granite's Xpercom which I have used a lot  
in the POS industry and which is a pain, Telcordia which back then was  
known to be even worse...), none of them was worth a dime...
Then I saw that brilliant combination which was Comptel + Visionael,  
it did mass provisioning and inventory systems for a whole national  
DSL unbundling architecture in France. Takes some time and patience to  
mix/tune them together, but once done ...


Greg VILLAIN
Independant Network  Telco Architecture Consultant
+33 6 87 48 66 14





Re: Inventory and workflow management systems

2008-04-04 Thread Andre Gironda

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:16 PM, vijay gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
 like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology store,
 CLR/DLR, x-connect, contracts, port inventory, etc.
 Any experiences in integrating workflow into those packages for work orders,
 modeling, drawdown levels, etc.

http://workflow.tikiwiki.org/tiki-index.php
http://www.openwfe.org

I also suggest Zimbra with aggregate portal sites (Liferay is good),
Ajax proxies, and/or RESTful web services.

Cheers,
Andre