On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:12:12PM +, Network Operations wrote:
Anyone seeing any issues with level3? We can connect to every other
IP in our Class C. When tracerouting to individual IP's,
(x.x.x.50/51/52/53) we get a drop at
ge-4-16.car2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.59.146.53] for 50,
@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Issues with level3?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:12:12PM +, Network Operations wrote:
Anyone seeing any issues with level3? We can connect to every other
IP in our Class C. When tracerouting to individual IP's,
(x.x.x.50/51/52/53) we get a drop at
ge-4-16.car2
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than slash
twenty four :-)
--
Bruce H. McIntosh
On 01/15/2013 11:12 AM, Network Operations wrote:
Anyone seeing any issues with level3? We can connect to every other IP in our
Class C. When tracerouting to individual IP's, (x.x.x.50/51/52/53) we get a
drop at ge-4-16.car2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.59.146.53] for 50, but 51 is
fine, drop
I tend to enjoy being rebellious... Lol
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
Original message
From: Bruce H McIntosh b...@ufl.edu
Date: 01/15/2013 9:32 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Issues with level3?
On Tue, 2013-01-15
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than slash
twenty four :-)
You realize that class-c address space was only found within 192/8
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:52 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than slash
twenty four
- Original Message -
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than
slash
twenty four :-)
You realize that class-c
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than slash
twenty four :-)
Not to mention that it's classier.
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI -
Randy beat me.. :/
Class C
192. 0. 0. 0 = 1100...
223.255.255.255 = 1101...
110n...
On 1/15/13 10:04 AM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:
- Original Message -
On
On 1/15/13 10:04 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
- Original Message -
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than
slash
twenty four
: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:38 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: networkoperati...@etsms.com
Subject: Re: Issues with level3?
On 01/15/2013 11:12 AM, Network Operations wrote:
Anyone seeing any issues with level3? We can connect to every other IP in
our Class C. When tracerouting to individual IP's
joel jaeggli wrote:
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than slash
twenty four :-)
You realize that class-c address space was
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:52:24 -0500, Joe Maimon said:
I only ever say class-c sized. And only when trying to communicate with
the slash-whats.
Your mistake there is trying to communicate with people who have been in
networking long enough to understand class-c, but *still* haven't educated
--- original message --
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
---
I'm having trouble rectifying the top part of your email:
b...@ufl.edu wrote:
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than slash
twenty four :-)
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:52:24 -0500, Joe Maimon said:
I only ever say class-c sized. And only when trying to communicate with
the slash-whats.
Your mistake there is trying to communicate with people who have been in
networking long enough to understand
It might be associated with some backbone problems that internap
reported starting this morning. I got the all is fixed email about an
hour ago.
CL
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Rogers [mailto:phi...@phiber.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Could be the AboveNet fiber they are likely using between the facilities.
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lowe [mailto:cl...@intelius.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:50 PM
To: Christopher Rogers; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Issues with level3 in Seattle
It might
...@switchtower.org
- Original Message -
From: Robin Rodriguez rrodrig...@ifbyphone.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:10:32 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Issues with Level3 in chicago?
What kind of issues? I just checked two 10G connections from 350 Canal
What kind of issues? I just checked two 10G connections from 350 Canal
and 1905 Lunt and don't seen anything of concern. Most of my traffic
stays on Level3, so I only briefly checked that I could route off Level3
from the connections. Seems fine here
Robin
Nicholas R. Cappelletti wrote:
We
...@switchtower.org
---
Nick Cappelletti
n...@switchtower.org
- Original Message -
From: Robin Rodriguez rrodrig...@ifbyphone.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:10:32 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Issues with Level3 in chicago?
What kind of issues? I just
: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:11 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Issues with Level3 in chicago?
What kind of issues? I just checked two 10G connections from 350 Canal
and 1905 Lunt and don't seen anything of concern. Most of my traffic
stays on Level3, so I only briefly checked that I could
Major convulsions visible to Sprint customers when crossing into Level3 and
lots of flaps showing in route-views.oregon-ix.net for our prefixes. Calgon,
take me away ...
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Nicholas R. Cappelletti
n...@switchtower.org wrote:
We just experienced some
23 matches
Mail list logo
